Development trend of urban design in “digital age”: Pan-dimensionality and individual-ubiquity

Abstract

The wave of “digital age” featuring digital information is coming. Digital technology is profoundly changing the societal development direction and evolution paths. It also has significant bearing on production modes, social interactions and lifestyles. With regard to urban design, a system of knowledge about the creation and adaptation of material space forms that integrate humanities, art, technology and materials, digital technology has provided it with a brand-new and revolutionary scientific impetus for its evolution. The result of this evolution is “digital urban design paradigm based on human-computer interaction”, i.e., the urban development is moving toward “pan-dimensionality” and “individual ubiquity”. The future of urban design will construct a new approach to urban research and engineering, which is more complex, capable of accommodating and compatible with multiple goals of “instrumental rationality” and “value rationality”. Such a new approach shall be led by the probabilistic theory of “gray scale thinking”, reflecting quaternary synergetic view of “scientific rationality, ecological rationality, cultural rationality and technical rationality” to realize the cognitive progress of “engineering for the benefit of mankind”.

References

  1. 1.

    Elia G, Margherita A, Passiante G. Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 150: 119791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Diwekar U, Amekudzi-Kennedy A, Bakshi B, Baumgartner R, Boumans R, Burger P, Cabezas H, Egler M, Farley J, Fath B, Gleason T, Huang Y, Karunanithi A, Khanna V, Mangan A, Mayer A L, Mukherjee R, Mullally G, Rico-Ramirez V, Shonnard D, Svanström M, Theis T. A perspective on the role of uncertainty in sustainability science and engineering. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 164: 105140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pan Y. Heading toward Artificial Intelligence 2.0. Engineering (Beijing), 2016, 2(4): 409–413

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mylopoulos J. Information modeling in the time of the revolution. Information Systems, 1998, 23(3–4): 127–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dufva T, Dufva M. Grasping the future of the digital society. Futures, 2019, 107: 17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Balogun A L, Marks D, Sharma R, Shekhar H, Balmes C, Maheng D, Arshad A, Salehi P. Assessing the potentials of digitalization as a tool for climate change adaptation and sustainable development in urban centres. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 53: 101888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Teubner R A, Stockhinger J. Literature review: Understanding information systems strategy in the digital age. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2020, 29(4): 101642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wang J, Cao S J, Yu C W. Development trend and challenges of sustainable urban design in the digital age. Indoor and Built Environment, 2021, 30(1): 3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Abousaeidi M, Hakimian P. Developing a checklist for assessing urban design qualities of residential complexes in new peripheral parts of Iranian cities: A case study of Kerman, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 60: 102251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wang J. Four generations of urban design development paradigms from the perspective of rational planning. City Planning, 2018, 42(1): 9–73

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Louail T, Lenormand M, Cantu Ros O G, Picornell M, Herranz R, Frias-Martinez E, Ramasco J J, Barthelemy M. From mobile phone data to the spatial structure of cities. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4(1): 5276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ren C, Cao S J. Implementation and visualization of artificial intelligent ventilation control system using fast prediction models and limited monitoring data. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 52: 101860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yang J, Shi Y, Yu C, Cao S J. Challenges of using mobile phone signalling data to estimate urban population density: Towards smart cities and sustainable urban development. Indoor and Built Environment, 2020, 29(2): 147–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Barkley J E, Lepp A. The effects of smartphone facilitated social media use, treadmill walking, and schoolwork on boredom in college students: Results of a within subjects, controlled experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021, 114: 106555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wang C, Qin F, Samuel R D J. Cloud assisted big data information retrieval system for critical data supervision in disaster regions. Computer Communications, 2020, 151: 548–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Büchel K, Ehrlich M. Cities and the structure of social interactions: Evidence from mobile phone data. Journal of Urban Economics, 2020, 119: 103276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Roth S. Digital transformation of social theory. A research update. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 146: 88–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Borzan A I, Băldean D L. The development of a new interface for intelligent control of energy supply in dynamic environment with process digitization. Procedia Manufacturing, 2020, 46: 914–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Doukari O, Greenwood D. Automatic generation of building information models from digitized plans. Automation in Construction, 2020, 113: 103129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Abdul-Rahman M, Chan E H W, Wong M S, Irekponor V E, Abdul-Rahman M O. A framework to simplify pre-processing location-based social media big data for sustainable urban planning and management. Cities (London, England), 2020, 109: 102986

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kousiouris G, Akbar A, Sancho J, Ta-shma P, Psychas A, Kyriazis D, Varvarigou T. An integrated information lifecycle management framework for exploiting social network data to identify dynamic large crowd concentration events in smart cities applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2018, 78: 516–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gong V X, Daamen W, Bozzon A, Hoogendoorn S P. Crowd characterization for crowd management using social media data in city events. Travel Behaviour & Society, 2020, 20: 192–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kong L, Liu Z, Wu J. A systematic review of big data-based urban sustainability research: State-of-the-science and future directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 273: 123142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sanchez-Sepulveda M, Fonseca D, Franquesa J, Redondo E. Virtual interactive innovations applied for digital urban transformations. Mixed approach. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2019, 91: 371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Khan S, Nazir S, García-Magariño I, Hussain A. Deep learning-based urban big data fusion in smart cities: Towards traffic monitoring and flow-preserving fusion. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2021, 89: 106906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mark R, Anya G. Ethics of using smart city ai and big data: The case of four large european cities. ORBIT Journal, 2019, 2(2): 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kandt J, Batty M. Smart cities, big data and urban policy: Towards urban analytics for the long run. Cities (London, England), 2020, 109: 102992

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Abd Elrahman A S, Asaad M. Urban design & urban planning: A critical analysis to the theoretical relationship gap. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2021, 12(1): 1163–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Charef R, Emmitt S. Uses of building information modelling for overcoming barriers to a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 285: 124854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lom M, Pribyl O. Smart city model based on systems theory. International Journal of Information Management, 2021, 56: 102092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wang J. Vision of China’s future urban construction reform: In the perspective of comprehensive prevention and control for multi disasters. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 64: 102511

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the 13th Five Year National Science and Technology Support Key Project of China (No. 2017YPC0702500)

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianguo Wang.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J. Development trend of urban design in “digital age”: Pan-dimensionality and individual-ubiquity. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15, 569–575 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0735-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • digital age
  • urban design
  • multiple objectives
  • human-computer interaction
  • pan-dimensionality
  • individual-ubiquity