Skip to main content
Log in

Model test and discrete element method simulation of shield tunneling face stability in transparent clay

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stability of the shield tunneling face is an extremely important factor affecting the safety of tunnel construction. In this study, a transparent clay with properties similar to those of Tianjin clay is prepared and a new transparent clay model test apparatus is developed to overcome the “black box” problem in the traditional model test. The stability of the shield tunneling face (failure mode, influence range, support force, and surface settlement) is investigated in transparent clay under active failure. A series of transparent clay model tests is performed to investigate the active failure mode, influence range, and support force of the shield tunneling face under different burial depth conditions, whereas particle flow code three-dimensional numerical simulations are conducted to verify the failure mode of the shield tunneling face and surface settlement along the transverse section under different burial depth conditions. The results show that the engineering characteristics of transparent clay are similar to those of soft clay in Binhai, Tianjin and satisfy visibility requirements. Two types of failure modes are obtained: the overall failure mode (cover/diameter: C/D ⩽ 1.0) and local failure mode (C/D ⩾ 2.0). The influence range of the transverse section is wider than that of the longitudinal section when C/D ⩾ 2.0. Additionally, the normalized thresholds of the relative displacement and support force ratio are 3%–6% and 0.2–0.4, respectively. Owing to the cushioning effect of the clay layer, the surface settlement is significantly reduced as the tunnel burial depth increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Horn N. Horizontal earth pressure on the vertical surfaces of the tunnel tubes. In: Proceedings of the National Conference of the Hungarian Civil Engineering Industry. Budapest, Hungary, 1961 (in German)

  2. Murayama S, Endo M, Hashiba T, Yamamoto K, Sasaki H. Geotechnical aspects for the excavating performance of the shield machines. In: The 21st Annual Lecture in Meeting of Japan Society of Civil Engineers. Tokyo, Japan, 1966

  3. Jancsecz S, Steiner W. Face Support for a Large Mix-Shield in Heterogeneous Ground Conditions. Tunnelling’94. Boston, MA: Springer, 1994, 531–550

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belter B, Heiermann W, Katzenbach R, Maidl B, Quick H, Wittke W. New concepts for realization of infrastructural projects. Bauingenieur, 1999, 74(1): 1–7 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wei G, He F. Calculation of minimal support pressure acting on shield face during pipe jacking in sandy soil. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2007, 3(5): 903–908 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hu W T, Lü X L, Huang M S. Three-dimensional limit equilibrium solution of the support pressure on the shield tunnel face. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2011, 7(5): 853–856 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Broms B B, Bennermark H. Stability of clay at vertical openings. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1967, 96(1): 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis E H, Gunn M J, Mair R J, Seneviratine H N. The stability of shallow tunnels and underground openings in cohesive material. Geotechnique, 1980, 30(4): 397–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leca E, Dormieux L. Upper and lower bound solutions for the face stability of shallow circular tunnels in frictional material. Geotechnique, 1990, 40(4): 581–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lü X L, Wang H R, Huang M S. Limit theoretical study on face stability of shield tunnels. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(1): 57–62 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kirsch A. Experimental investigation of the face stability of shallow tunnels in sand. Acta Geotechnica, 2010, 5(1): 43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen R P, Li J, Chen Y M, Kong L G. Large-scale tests on face stability of shield tunnelling in dry cohesionless soil. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(1): 117–122 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vlachopoulos N, Vazaios I, Madjdabadi B M. Investigation into the influence of excavation of twin-bored tunnels within weak rock masses adjacent to slopes. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2018, 55(11): 1533–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu X L, Zhou Y C, Li F D. Centrifuge model test and numerical simulation of stability of excavation face of shield tunnel in silty sand. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(11): 3324–3328 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. di Prisco C, Flessati L, Frigerio G, Castellanza R, Caruso M, Galli A, Lunardi P. Experimental investigation of the time-dependent response of unreinforced and reinforced tunnel faces in cohesive soils. Acta Geotechnica, 2018, 13(3): 651–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou S W, Zhuang X Y, Zhu H H, Rabczuk T. Phase field modelling of crack propagation, branching and coalescence in rocks. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 96: 174–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou S W, Zhuang X Y, Rabczuk T. Phase field modeling of brittle compressive-shear fractures in rock-like materials: A new driving force and a hybrid formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 355: 729–752

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhuang X Y, Zhou S W, Sheng M, Li G S. On the hydraulic fracturing in naturally-layered porous media using the phase field method. Engineering Geology, 2020, 266: 105306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Manouchehrian A, Marji M F, Mohebbi M. Comparison of indirect boundary element and finite element methods. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2012, 6(4): 385–392

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li Z L, Soga K, Wright P. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the behaviour of cross passage between cast-iron tunnels. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016, 53(6): 930–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen R P, Zhang P, Wu H N, Wang Z T, Zhong Z Q. Prediction of shield tunneling-induced ground settlement using machine learning techniques. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1363–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu C, Pan L F, Wang F, Zhang Z X, Cui J, Liu H, Duan Z, Ji X Y. Three-dimensional discrete element analysis on tunnel face instability in cobbles using ellipsoidal particles. Materials (Basel), 2019, 12(20): 3347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vazaios I, Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs M S. Mechanical analysis and interpretation of excavation damage zone formation around deep tunnels within massive rock masses using hybrid finite-discrete element approach: Case of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) Underground Research Laboratory (URL) test tunnel. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2019, 56(1): 35–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Y M, Zhuang X Y, Lackner R. Stability analysis of shotcrete supported crown of NATM tunnels with discontinuity layout optimization. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2018, 42(11): 1199–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun Z Z, Zhang Y M, Yuan Y, Mang H A. Stability analysis of a fire-loaded shallow tunnel by means of a thermo-hydro-chemomechanical model and discontinuity layout optimization. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2019, 43(16): 2551–2564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yan X, Sun Z Z, Li S C, Liu R T, Zhang Q S, Zhang Y M. Quantitatively assessing the pre-grouting effect on the stability of tunnels excavated in fault zones with discontinuity layout optimization: A case study. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1393–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Cracking particles: A simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2316–2343

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(37–40): 2437–2455

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Mannheimer R J, Oswald C J. Development of transparent porous-media with permeabilities and porosities comparable to soils, aquifers, and petroleum reservoirs. Ground Water, 1993, 31(5): 781–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahmed M, Iskander M. Transparent soil model tests and FE analyses on tunneling induced ground settlement. In: Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering. Virginia: ASCE, 2011, 3381–3390

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gong Q M, Zhou J H, Zhou S H, Ji C. Strength property and feasibility test of transparent soil to model clayey soil. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2016, 44(6): 853–860

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kong G Q, Li H, Yang Q, Meng Y D, Xu X L. Cyclic undrained behavior and liquefaction resistance of transparent sand manufactured by fused quartz. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 108: 13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. De Guzman E M B, Alfaro M C. Laboratory-scale model studies on corduroy-reinforced road embankments on peat foundations using transparent soil. Transportation Geotechnics, 2018, 16: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kong G Q, Li H, Yang G, Cao Z H. Investigation on shear modulus and damping ratio of transparent soils with different pore fluids. Granular Matter, 2018, 20(1): 8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang J X, Liu X T, Liu S L, Zhu Y F, Pan W Q, Zhou J. Physical model test of transparent soil on coupling effect of cut-off wall and pumping wells during foundation pit dewatering. Acta Geotechnica, 2019, 14(1): 141–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Iskander M, Liu J Y. Spatial deformation measurement using transparent soil. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2010, 33(4): 314–321

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen J F, Guo X P, Xue J F, Guo P H. Load behaviour of model strip footings on reinforced transparent soils. Geosynthetics International, 2019, 26(3): 251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun J Z, Liu J Y. Visualization of tunnelling-induced ground movement in transparent sand. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 40: 236–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lü X L, Zhou Y C, Huang M S, Zeng S. Experimental study of the face stability of shield tunnel in sands under seepage condition. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 74: 195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xiang Y Z, Liu H L, Zhang W G, Chu J, Zhou D, Xiao Y. Application of transparent soil model test and DEM simulation in study of tunnel failure mechanism. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 74: 178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gong Q M, Zhao Y, Zhou J H, Zhou S H. Uplift resistance and progressive failure mechanisms of metro shield tunnel in soft clay. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 82: 222–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yuan B X, Sun M, Wang Y X, Zhai L H, Luo Q Z, Zhang X Q. Full 3D displacement measuring system for 3D displacement field of soil around a laterally loaded pile in transparent soil. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2019, 19(5): 04019028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lei H Y, Liu Y N, Zhai S B, Tu C K, Liu M. Visibility and mechanical properties of transparent clay. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S2): 53–56 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang Y P, Li L, Wang S Z. Experimental study on pore fluid for forming transparent soil. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2014, 48(10): 1828–1834 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lei H Y, Ren Q, Lu H B, Li B. Research on consolidation property of double layer soft clay foundation under different relative thickness conditions. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018, 14(3): 705–711 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hong Z S, Onitsuka K. A method of correcting yield stress and compression index of Ariake clays for sample disturbance. Soils and foundations, 1998, 38(2): 211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hong Z S, Liu S Y, Yu X J. On destructuration of structured soils. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(5): 684–687 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sun X H, Miao L C, Lin H S. Arching effect of soil ahead of working face in shield tunnel in sand with various depths. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(10): 2980–2988 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mair R J. Centrifugal Modelling of Tunnel Construction in Soft Clay. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  50. Franza A, Marshall A M, Zhou B, Shirlaw N, Boone S. Greenfield tunnelling in sands: The effects of soil density and relative depth. Geotechnique, 2018, 69(4): 297–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang K G, Liu S Y. Soil Mechanics. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ahmed M, Iskander M. Evaluation of tunnel face stability by transparent soil models. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 27(1): 101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhou S W, Rabczuk T, Zhuang X Y. Phase field modeling of quasistatic and dynamic crack propagation: COMSOL implementation and case studies. Advances in Engineering Software, 2018, 122: 31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhou S W, Zhuang X Y, Rabczuk T. A phase-field modeling approach of fracture propagation in poroelastic media. Engineering Geology, 2018, 240: 189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhou S W, Zhuang X Y, Rabczuk T. Phase-field modeling of fluid-driven dynamic cracking in porous media. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 350: 169–198

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Peck R B. Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Mexico, 1969: 225–290

  57. Knothe S. Observations of surface movements under influence of mining and their theoretical interpretation. In: Proceedings of the European congress on ground movement. Leeds: University of Leeds, 1957, 210–218

    Google Scholar 

  58. Mair R J, Taylor R N. Theme lecture: Bored tunnelling in the urban environment. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. balkema, Hamburg, 1997, 2353–2385

  59. Hung C J, Monsees J, Munfah N, Wisniewski J. Technical Manual for Design and Construction of Road Tunnels. Report to US Department of Transportation prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. FHWA-NHI-09–010. 2009

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study described herein was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC0805402) and the Open Project of the State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (No. SLDRCE17-01). All support received is appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yao Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, H., Zhang, Y., Hu, Y. et al. Model test and discrete element method simulation of shield tunneling face stability in transparent clay. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15, 147–166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0704-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0704-6

Keywords

Navigation