Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of fixed beam without interacting bars

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing the bending capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) elements is one of important topics in structure engineering. The goal of this study is to develop a transferred stress system (TSS) on longitudinal reinforcement bars for increasing the bending capacity of RC frames. The study is divided into two parts, i.e., experimental tests and nonlinear FE analysis. The experiments were carried out to determine the load-deflection curves and crack patterns of the ordinary and TSS fixed frame. The FE models were developed for simulating the fixed frames. The obtained load-deflection results and the observed cracks from the FE analysis and experimental tests are compared to evaluate the validation of the FE nonlinear models. Based on the validated FE models, the stress distribution on the ordinary and TSS bars were evaluated. We found the load carrying capacity and ductility of TSS fixed beam are 29.39% and 23.69% higher compared to those of the ordinary fixed beams. The crack expansion occurs on the ordinary fixed beam, although there are several crack openings at mid-span of the TSS fixed beam. The crack distribution was changed in the TSS fixed frame. The TSS fixed beam is proposed to employ in RC frame instead of ordinary RC beam for improving the performance of RC frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Figeys W, Verstrynge E, Brosens K, Van Schepdael L, Dereymaeker J, Van Gemert D, Schueremans L. Feasibility of a novel system to prestress externally bonded reinforcement. Materials and Structures, 2011, 44(9): 1655–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kotynia R, Cholostiakow S. New proposal for flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using CFRP T-shaped profiles. Polymers, 2015, 7(11): 2461–2477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Papanicolaou C G, Triantafillou T C, Papathanasiou M, Karlos K. Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: Out-of-plane cyclic loading. Materials and Structures, 2007, 41(1): 143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pham T M, Hao H. Review of concrete structures strengthened with FRP against impact loading. Structures, 2016, 7: 59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanarslan H M. Flexural strengthening of RC beams with prefabricated ultra high performance fiber-reinforced concrete laminates. Engineering Structures, 2017, 151: 337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rasheed H A, Abdalla J, Hawileh R, Al-tamimi A K. Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with externally bonded Aluminum Alloy plates. Engineering Structures, 2017, 147: 473–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Esfandiari M J, Rahimi Bondarabadi H, Sheikholarefi N S, Dehghan Manshadi S H. Numerical investigation of parameters influencing debonding of FRP sheets in shear-strengthened beams. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(2): 246–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghasemi M R, Shishegaran A. Role of slanted reinforcement on bending capacity SS beams. Vibroengineering PROCEDIA, 2017, 11: 195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elmessalami N, El Refai A, Abed F. Fiber-reinforced polymers bars for compression reinforcement: A promising alternative to steel bars. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 209: 725–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rabczuk T, Eibl J. Numerical analysis of prestressed concrete beams using a coupled element free Galerkin/finite element approach. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2004, 41(3–4): 1061–1080

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaallal O, Nollet M J, Perraton D. Strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with extern ally bonded fiber-reinforced-plastic plates: Design guidelines for shear and flexure. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1998, 25(4): 692–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ross C A, Jerome D M, Tedesco J W, Hughes M L. Strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with externally bonded composite laminates. Structural Journal, 1999, 96(2): 212–220

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee H Y, Jung W T, Chung E. Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with pre-stressed near surface mounted CFRP systems. Composite Structures, 2017, 163: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shishegaran A, Ghasemi M R, Varaee H. Performance of a novel bent-up bars system not interacting with concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1301–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-xuan H. A geometrically nonlinear three dimensional cohesive crack method for reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(16): 4740–4758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Application of particle methods to static fracture of reinforced concrete structures. International Journal of Fracture, 2006, 137(1–4): 19–49

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Shisehgaran A, Daneshpajoh F, Taghavizade H, Mirvalad S. Developing conductive concrete containing wire rope and steel powder wastes for route deicing. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 232: 117184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM standard A 370. Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  19. BS EN 12390-3. Testing Hardened Concrete. Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens. London: BSI, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  20. BS EN 12390-1. Testing Hardened Concrete. Part 3: Shape, Dimensions and Other Requirements for Specimens and Moulds. London: BSI, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  21. BS EN 12390-2. Testing Hardened Concrete. Part 3: Making and Curing Specimens for Strength Tests. London: BSI, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou S, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Phase-field modeling of fluid-driven dynamic cracking in porous media. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 350: 169–198

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou S, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Phase field modeling of brittle compressive-shear fractures in rock-like materials: A new driving force and a hybrid formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 355: 729–752

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou S, Rabczuk T, Zhuang X. Phase field modeling of quasi-static and dynamic crack propagation: COMSOL implementation and case studies. Advances in Engineering Software, 2018, 122: 31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou S, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A phase-field modeling approach of fracture propagation in poroelastic media. Engineering Geology, 2018, 240: 189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou S, Zhuang X, Zhu H, Rabczuk T. Phase field modelling of crack propagation, branching and coalescence in rocks. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 96: 174–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dassault Systems Simulia Corp. ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual 6.10-EF. 2010

  28. Finite Element Analyses F E A. Abaqus/CAE Version 6.13: Computer Aided Engineering. Dassault Systemes. 2013.

  29. Birtel V, Mark P. Parameterised finite element modelling of RC beam shear failure. In: ABAQUS Users’ Conference. Cambridge, MA, 2006, 95–108

  30. Kwak H G, Hwang J W. FE model to simulate bond-slip behavior in composite concrete beam bridges. Computers & Structures, 2010, 88(17–18): 973–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rabczuk T. Computational methods for fracture in brittle and quasi-brittle solids: State-of-the-art review and future perspectives. ISRN Applied Mathematics, 2013, 2013: 332–369

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Shishegaran A, Amiri A, Jafari M A. Seismic performance of box-plate, box-plate with UNP, box-plate with L-plate and ordinary rigid beam-to-column moment connections. Journal of Vibroengineering, 2018, 20(3): 1470–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hillerborg A, Modéer M, Petersson P E. Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement and Concrete Research, 1976, 6(6): 773–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. European International Concrete Commission. CEB-FIP Model Code 1990. London: Thomas Telford Ltd., 1990

    Google Scholar 

  35. Szarliñski J, Winnicki A, Podleœ K. Constructions of Concrete in Plastic States. Krakow: Krakow University of Technology, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pietruszczak S T, Mroz Z. Finite element analysis of deformation of strain-softening materials. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1981, 17(3): 327–334

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timon Rabczuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shishegaran, A., Karami, B., Rabczuk, T. et al. Performance of fixed beam without interacting bars. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 14, 1180–1195 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0661-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0661-0

Keywords

Navigation