Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing artificial neural network performance for predicting interlayer conditions and layer modulus of multi-layered flexible pavement

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering volume 14, pages 487–500 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of the artificial neural network (ANN) approach for predicting interlayer conditions and layer modulus of a multi-layered flexible pavement structure. To achieve this goal, two ANN based back-calculation models were proposed to predict the interlayer conditions and layer modulus of the pavement structure. The corresponding database built with ANSYS based finite element method computations for four types of a structure subjected to falling weight deflectometer load. In addition, two proposed ANN models were verified by comparing the results of ANN models with the results of PADAL and double multiple regression models. The measured pavement deflection basin data was used for the verifications. The comparing results concluded that there are no significant differences between the results estimated by ANN and double multiple regression models. PADAL modeling results were not accurate due to the inability to reflect the real pavement structure because pavement structure was not completely continuous. The prediction and verification results concluded that the proposed back-calculation model developed with ANN could be used to accurately predict layer modulus and interlayer conditions. In addition, the back-calculation model avoided the back-calculation errors by considering the interlayer condition, which was barely considered by former models reported in the published studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)

References

  1. Chen Y, Lopp G, Roque R. Effects of an asphalt rubber membrane interlayer on pavement reflective cracking performance. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2013, 25(12): 1936–1940

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blankenship P, Iker N, Drbohlav J. Interlayer and design considerations to retard reflective cracking. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004, 1896(1): 177–186

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lv S, Fan X, Xia C, Zheng J, Chen D, You L. Characteristics of moduli decay for the asphalt mixture under different loading conditions. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2018, 8(5): 840

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mehta Y, Roque R. Evaluation of FWD data for determination of layer moduli of pavements. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2003, 15(1): 25–31

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nazzal M, Abu-Farsakh M, Alshibli K, Mohammad L. Evaluating the light falling weight deflectometer device for in situ measurement of elastic modulus of pavement layers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016, 1: 13–22

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu K, Zhang X, Guo D, Wang F, Xie H. The interlaminar shear failure characteristics of asphalt pavement coupled heating cables. Materials and Structures, 2018, 51(3): 67

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu K, Li Y, Wang F, Xie H, Pang H, Bai H. Analytical and model studies on behavior of rigid polyurethane composite aggregate under compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2019, 31(3): 04019007

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim H, Arraigada M, Raab C, Partl M N. Numerical and experimental analysis for the interlayer behavior of double-layered asphalt pavement specimens. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2011, 23(1): 12–20

    Google Scholar 

  9. You L, Yan K, Hu Y, Zollinger D G. Spectral element solution for transversely isotropic elastic multi-layered structures subjected to axisymmetric loading. Computers and Geotechnics, 2016, 1: 67–73

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fardad K, Najafi B, Ardabili S F, Mosavi A, Shamshirband S, Rabczuk T. Biodegradation of medicinal plants waste in an anaerobic digestion reactor for biogas production. Computers Materials and Continua. 2018, 55(3): 318–392

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ai Z Y, Cheng Y C, Zeng W Z. Analytical layer-element solution to axisymmetric consolidation of multilayered soils. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(2): 227–232

    Google Scholar 

  12. Uzan J, Livneh M, Eshed Y. Investigation of adhesion properties between asphaltic-concrete layers. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proc, 1978, 1: 495–521

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kruntcheva M R, Collop A C, Thom N H. Properties of asphalt concrete layer interfaces. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2006, 18(3): 467–471

    Google Scholar 

  14. You L, Yan K, Hu Y, Ma W. Impact of interlayer on the anisotropic multi-layered medium overlaying viscoelastic layer under axisymmetric loading. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2018, 1: 726–743

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. You L, Yan K, Liu N, Shi T, Lv S. Assessing the mechanical responses for anisotropic multi-layered medium under harmonic moving load by Spectral Element Method (SEM). Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2019, 1: 22–37

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoo P, Al-Qadi I L, Elseifi M, Janajreh I. Flexible pavement responses to different loading amplitudes considering layer interface condition and lateral shear forces. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2006, 7(1): 73–86

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kruntcheva M R, Collop A C, Thom N H. Effect of bond condition on flexible pavement performance. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2005, 131(11): 880–888

    Google Scholar 

  18. You L, You Z, Dai Q, Xie X, Washko S, Gao J. Investigation of adhesion and interface bond strength for pavements underlying chip-seal: Effect of asphalt-aggregate combinations and freeze-thaw cycles on chip-seal. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 1: 322–330

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peng Y, He Y. Structural characteristics of cement-stabilized soil bases with 3D finite element method. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2009, 3(4): 428

    Google Scholar 

  20. You L, You Z, Dai Q, Guo S, Wang J, Schultz M. Characteristics of water-foamed asphalt mixture under multiple freeze-thaw cycles: Laboratory evaluation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2018, 30(11): 04018270

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ktari R, Millien A, Fouchal F, Pop I O, Petit C. Pavement interface damage behavior in tension monotonic loading. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 1: 430–442

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zak J, Monismith C L, Coleri E, Harvey J T. Uniaxial shear tester—New test method to determine shear properties of asphalt mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2017, 18(sup1): 87–103

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lv S, Wang S, Liu C, Zheng J, Li Y, Peng X. Synchronous testing method for tension and compression moduli of asphalt mixture under dynamic and static loading states. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2018, 30(10): 04018268

    Google Scholar 

  24. Canestrari F, Santagata E. Temperature effects on the shear behaviour of tack coat emulsions used in flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2005, 6(1): 39–46

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sholar G A, Page G C, Musselman J A, Upshaw P B, Moseley H L. Preliminary investigation of a test method to evaluate bond strength of bituminous tack coats (with discussion). Electronic Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 2004, 1: 771–806

    Google Scholar 

  26. Raab C, Partl M N. Interlayer shear performance: Experience with different pavement structures. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress Held Vienna. Vienna: Foundation Eurasphalt, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mohammad L, Raqib M, Huang B. Influence of asphalt tack coat materials on interface shear strength. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1789, 2002: 56–65

    Google Scholar 

  28. West RC, Zhang J, Moore J. Evaluation of Bond Strength between Pavement Layers. NCAT Report 2005:05-8. 2005

  29. Wheat M. Evalutation Of Bond Strength at Asphalt Interfaces. Kansas: Kansas State University, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  30. Baek J, Al-Qadi I, Xie W, Buttlar W. In situ assessment of interlayer systems to abate reflective cracking in hot-mix asphalt overlays. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008, 2084(1): 104–113

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ozer H, Al-Qadi I L, Wang H, Leng Z. Characterisation of interface bonding between hot-mix asphalt overlay and concrete pavements: modelling and in-situ response to accelerated loading. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2012, 13(2): 181–196

    Google Scholar 

  32. You L, You Z, Yan K. Effect of anisotropic characteristics on the mechanical behavior of asphalt concrete overlay. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(1): 110–122

    Google Scholar 

  33. Goel A, Das A. Nondestructive testing of asphalt pavements for structural condition evaluation: A state of the art. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 2008, 23(2): 121–140

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xue W, Wang L, Wang D, Druta C. Pavement health monitoring system based on an embedded sensing network. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2014, 26(10): 04014072

    Google Scholar 

  35. Garbowski T, Pożarycki A. Multi-level backcalculation algorithm for robust determination of pavement layers parameters. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 2017, 25(5): 674–693

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Levenberg E. Backcalculation with an implanted inertial sensor. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015, 2525(1): 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu P, Wang D, Otto F, Oeser M. Application of semi-analytical finite element method to analyze the bearing capacity of asphalt pavements under moving loads. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2018, 12(2): 215–221

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fwa T, Chandrasegaran S. Regression model for back-calculation of rigid-pavement properties. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2001, 127(4): 353–355

    Google Scholar 

  39. Al Hakim B, Cheung L W, Armitage R J. Use of FWD data for prediction of bonding between pavement layers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1999, 1(1): 49–59

    Google Scholar 

  40. You L, Yan K, Hu Y, Liu J, Ge D. Spectral element method for dynamic response of transversely isotropic asphalt pavement under impact load. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2018, 19(1): 223–238

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sharma S, Das A. Backcalculation of pavement layer moduli from failing weight deflectometer data using an artificial neural network. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2008, 35(1): 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bilodeau J P, Dore G. Estimation of tensile strains at the bottom of asphalt concrete layers under wheel loading using deflection basins from falling weight deflectometer tests. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2012, 39(7): 771–778

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bilodeau J P, Dore G. Direct estimation of vertical strain at the top of the subgrade soil from interpretation of falling weight deflectometer deflection basins. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 41(5): 403–408

    Google Scholar 

  44. Grenier S, Konrad J M. Dynamic interpretation of failing weight deflectometer tests on flexible pavements using the spectral element method: Backcalculation. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2009, 36(6): 957–968

    Google Scholar 

  45. Grenier S, Konrad J M, LeBœuf D. Dynamic simulation of falling weight deflectometer tests on flexible pavements using the spectral element method: Forward calculations. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2009, 36(6): 944–956

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shafabakhsh G H, Ani O J, Talebsafa M. Artificial neural network modeling (ANN) for predicting rutting performance of nanomodified hot-mix asphalt mixtures containing steel slag aggregates. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 1: 136–143

    Google Scholar 

  47. Far M S S, Underwood B S, Ranjithan S R, Kim Y R, Jackson N. Application of artificial neural networks for estimating dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009, 2127(1): 173–186

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lacroix A, Kim Y, Ranjithan S. Backcalculation of dynamic modulus from resilient modulus of asphalt concrete with an artificial neural network. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008, (2057): 107–113

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ismail A. ANN-based empirical modelling of pile behaviour under static compressive loading. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2017, 12(4): 1–15

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials & Continua., 2019, 59(1): 345–359

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tarefder R, White L, Zaman M. Development and application of a rut prediction model for flexible pavement. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1936, 2005: 201–209

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kim S H, Yang J D, Jeong J H. Prediction of subgrade resilient modulus using artificial neural network. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 18(5): 1372–1379

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nazzal M D, Tatari O. Evaluating the use of neural networks and genetic algorithms for prediction of subgrade resilient modulus. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2013, 14(4): 364–373

    Google Scholar 

  54. Park H I, Kweon G C, Lee S R. Prediction of resilient modulus of granular subgrade soils and subbase materials using artificial neural network. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2009, 10(3): 647–665

    Google Scholar 

  55. Grenier S, Konrad J M, LeBœuf D. Dynamic simulation of falling weight deflectometer tests on flexible pavements using the spectral element method: forward calculations. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2009, 36(6): 944–956

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hadidi R, Gucunski N. Comparative study of static and dynamic falling weight deflectometer back-calculations using probabilistic approach. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2010, 136(3): 196–204

    Google Scholar 

  57. Duan Z H, Kou S C, Poon C S. Using artificial neural networks for predicting the elastic modulus of recycled aggregate concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 1: 524–532

    Google Scholar 

  58. Baughman D R, Liu Y A. Neural Networks in Bioprocessing and Chemical Engineering. San Diego, California: Academic press, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  59. Shafabakhsh G, Ani O J, Talebsafa M. Artificial neural network modeling (ANN) for predicting rutting performance of nanomodified hot-mix asphalt mixtures containing steel slag aggregates. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 1: 136–143

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 1: 19–31

    Google Scholar 

  61. Chaudhari YA, Katti G. Finite Element Analysis of Effect of Punching Shear in Flat Slab Using Ansys 16.0. 2016

  62. Shankar S, Nithyaprakash R. Effect of radial clearance on wear and contact pressure of hard-on-hard hip prostheses using finite element concepts. Tribology Transactions, 2014, 57(5): 814–820

    Google Scholar 

  63. Simões G J, Almeida C A, dos Reis N R S. Numerical simulations of damage and repair of thin wall pipes resulting from lateral denting. In: 2004 International ANSYS Conference. Pittsburgh, 2004

  64. Wang H, Al-Qadi I. Combined effect of moving wheel loading and three-dimensional contact stresses on perpetual pavement responses. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009, 2095(1): 53–61

    Google Scholar 

  65. Schubert S, Gsell D, Steiger R, Feltrin G. Influence of asphalt pavement on damping ratio and resonance frequencies of timber bridges. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(10): 3122–3129

    Google Scholar 

  66. Liu N, Yan K, Shi C, You L. Influence of interface conditions on the response of transversely isotropic multi-layered medium by impact load. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2018, 1: 485–493

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hsu K, Gupta H V, Sorooshian S. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resources Research, 1995, 31(10): 2517–2530

    Google Scholar 

  68. Hamdia K M, Lahmer T, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. Predicting the fracture toughness of PNCs: A stochastic approach based on ANN and ANFIS. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 1: 304–313

    Google Scholar 

  69. Saltan M, Terzi S. Comparative analysis of using artificial neural networks (ANN) and gene expression programming (GEP) in backcalculation of pavement layer thickness. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 2005, 12(1): 42–50

    Google Scholar 

  70. Yan K, You L. Investigation of complex modulus of asphalt mastic by artificial neural networks. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 2014, 1: 445–450

    Google Scholar 

  71. Karaboga D, Akay B, Ozturk C. Artificial bee colony (ABC) optimization algorithm for training feed-forward neural networks. In: International Conference on Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 2007, 318–329

  72. Badawy M F, Msekh M A, Hamdia K M, Steiner M K, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Hybrid nonlinear surrogate models for fracture behavior of polymeric nanocomposites. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 1: 64–75

    Google Scholar 

  73. Sharma B, K. Venugopalan P. Comparison of Neural Network Training Functions for Hematoma Classification in Brain CT Images. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, 2014, 16(1): 31–35

    Google Scholar 

  74. Beale M H, Hagan M T, Demuth H B. Neural Network Toolbox User’s Guide. Natick, MA: The MathWorks. Inc., 2010

    Google Scholar 

  75. Priyadarshini R, Dash N, Swarnkar T, Misra R. Functional analysis of artificial neural network for dataset classification. Special Issue of IJCCT, 2010, 1(2): 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  76. Liu J, Yan K, You L, Liu P, Yan K. Prediction models of mixtures’ dynamic modulus using gene expression programming. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2016, 18(11): 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  77. Pellinen T K. Investigation of the use of dynamic modulus as an indicator of hot-mix asphalt performance. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Arizona: Arizona State University, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  78. Bush A J, Baladi G Y. Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli. Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International, 1989

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51278188, 50808077, and 51778224) and the Project of Young Core Instructor Growth from Hunan Province. The first author also acknowledges the financial support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) under No. 201606130003. The authors are sincerely grateful for their financial support. In addition, the manuscript has received the written quality improvement assistance from Michigan Tech Multiliteracies Center during the revisions. The views and findings of this study represent those of the authors and may not reflect those of NSFC, Hunan University, and CSC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China

    Lingyun You, Kezhen Yan & Nengyuan Liu

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA

    Lingyun You

Authors
  1. Lingyun You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kezhen Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nengyuan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kezhen Yan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

You, L., Yan, K. & Liu, N. Assessing artificial neural network performance for predicting interlayer conditions and layer modulus of multi-layered flexible pavement. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 14, 487–500 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0609-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0609-4

Keywords

  • asphalt pavement
  • interlayer conditions
  • finite element method
  • artificial neural network
  • back-calculation

Search

Navigation