Peridynamics versus XFEM: a comparative study for quasi-static crack problems
- 132 Downloads
Peridynamics (PD) is a nonlocal continuum theory based on integro-differential equations without spatial derivatives. The fracture criterion is implicitly incorporated in the PD theory and fracture is a natural outcome of the simulation. However, capturing of complex mixed-mode crack patterns has been proven to be difficult with PD. On the other hand, the extended finite element method (XFEM) is one of the most popular methods for fracture which allows crack propagation with minimal remeshing. It requires a fracture criterion which is independent of the underlying discretization though a certain refinement is needed in order to obtain suitable results. This article presents a comparative study between XFEM and PD. Therefore, two examples are studied. The first example is crack propagation in a double notched specimen under uniaxial tension with different crack spacings in loading direction. The second example is the specimens with two center cracks. The results show that PD as well as XFEM are well suited to capture this type of behaviour.
KeywordsXFEM peridynamic bilateral crack parallel double cracks nonlocal theory
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. SLDRCE14-B-03) and Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 17ZR1431900).
- 10.Fang X, Jin F, Wang J. Cohesive crack model based on extended finite element method. Journal of Tsinghua University, 2007, 47(3): 344–347Google Scholar
- 11.Fang X, Jin F, Wang J. Seismic fracture simulation of the Koyna gravity dam using an extended finite element method. Journal of Tsinghua University, 2008, 48(12): 2065–2069Google Scholar
- 14.Areias P M A, Belytschko T. A comment on the article “A finite element method for simulation of strong and weak discontinuities in solid mechanics” by A. Hansbo and P. Hansbo [Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 193 (2004) 3523–3540]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 2006, 195: 1275–1276MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 18.Rabczuk T, Areias P M A. A meshfree thin shell for arbitrary evolving cracks based on an extrinsic basis. Cmes Computer Modeling in Engineering & Ences, 2006, 16(2): 115–130Google Scholar
- 50.Shen F, Zhang Q, Huang D. Damage and failure process of concrete structure under uni-axial tension based on peridynamics modeling. Chin J Comput Mech, 2013, 30: 79–83Google Scholar
- 51.Gu X, Zhou X P. The numerical simulation of tensile plate with circular hole using peridynamic theory. Chin J Comput Mech, 2015, 36(5): 376–383Google Scholar
- 52.Cheng Z, Liu J. Fracture analysis of functionally graded materials under impact loading based on peridynamics. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2016, (4): 634–639Google Scholar
- 55.Zeng S. Bilateral crack growth behavior of Q345 steel under uniaxial tensile load. Dissertation for master degree. Guangxi University, 2014Google Scholar