Advertisement

Effect of asphalt thin beams mixed with three nominal maximum aggregate sizes in the bending beam rheometer on the prediction of thermal properties of bituminous material

  • Chun-Hsing Ho
  • María Francisca Martínez González
  • Cristina Pilar Martín Linares
Research Article

Abstract

The objective of this research is to evaluate an impact of asphalt mixture beams with varying sizes of aggregate in the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR) for testing/predicting thermal cracking properties of asphalt pavements. The BBR test has following benefits: the equipment is cheaper, it uses smaller specimens, faster conditioning, easier availability for quality control, easier to manage, etc. However some concerns have been raised: some consider that the size of the aggregate may affect the test’s results; the other concern is that such small beams cannot represent the whole properties of the asphalt pavement. To address these criticisms, imaging techniques, statistical analysis, and viscoelastic modeling are used. Asphalt thin beams prepared with three different nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) (12.5mm, 9.5 mm, and 4.75 mm) were tested at three different temperatures (-18°C, -24°C, and -30°C). Based on results from statistical analyses and viscoelasticity, the ratio of asphalt binders and voids and stiffness differences among the three NMAS specimens are not significant, meaning that the impact of asphalt thin beams prepared with the three NMAS on the prediction of thermal cracking is minimal and can be neglected.

Keywords

bending beam rheometer thin beams thermal cracking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zofka A, Marasteanu M, Li X, Clyne T, McGraw J. Simple method to obtain asphalt binders low temperature properties from asphalt mixtures properties. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 2005, 74: 255–282Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Velasques R M. Effect of beam size on the creep stiffness of asphalt mixtures and low temperatures. Advanced Testing and Characteriztion of Bituminous Material, 2009Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ho C H, Romero P. Using asphalt mixture beams in the bending beam rheometer. Experimental and Numerical Approach. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2011, 12(2): 293–314Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clendennen C R, Romero P. Evaluating the representative volume element of asphalt concrete mixture beams for the testing in the bending beam rheometer. Multi-Scale Modeling and Characterization of Infrastructure Materials: Proceedings of the International RILEM Symposium. Stockholm, Sweden, 2013, 13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Determining the Flexural Creep Stiffness of Asphalt Binder Using the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR). In: Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing T313. 29 ed. 2009Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christensen D W, Bonaquist R. Evalutation of Indirect Tensile Test (IDT) Procedures for Low-Temperature Performance of Hot Mix Asphalt. Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Report 530, Washington, DC, 2004Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park S, Kim Y. Fitting prony-series viscoelastic models with powerlaw presmoothing. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2001, 13(1): 26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ho C H, Romero P. Using linear viscoelastic modeling to evaluate the low temperature properties of asphalt mixtures prepared with aggregates of different sizes. Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). International, 2013, 2(1): 122–139Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zofka A M. Investigation of Asphalt Concrete Creep Behavior Using 3-Point Bending Test. University of Minnesota. Minnesota: Pro-Quest, 2007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chun-Hsing Ho
    • 1
  • María Francisca Martínez González
    • 1
  • Cristina Pilar Martín Linares
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Construction Management, and Environmental EngineeringNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations