Skip to main content
Log in

Performance assessment of innovative seismic resilient steel knee braced frame

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Buckling restrained knee braced truss moment frame (BRKBTMF) is a novel and innovative steel structural system that utilizes the advantages of long-span trusses and dedicated structural fuses for seismic applications. Steel trusses are very economical and effective in spanning large distance. However, conventional steel trusses are typically not suitable for seismic application, due to its lack of ductility and poor energy dissipation capacity. BRKBTMF utilizes buckling restrained braces (BRBs) as the designated structural fuses to dissipate the sudden surge of earthquake energy. This allows the BRKBTMF to economically and efficiently create large span structural systems for seismic applications. In this paper, a prototype BRKBTMF office building located in Berkeley, California, USA, was designed using performance-based plastic design procedure. The seismic performance of the prototype building was assessed using the state-of-the-art finite element software, OpenSees. Detailed BRB hysteresis and advanced element removal technique was implemented. The modeling approach allows the simulation for the force-deformation response of the BRB and the force redistribution within the system after the BRBs fracture. The developed finite element model was analyzed using incremental dynamic analysis approach to quantify the seismic performance of BRKBTMF. The results show BRKBTMF has excellent seismic performance with well controlled structural responses and resistance against collapse. In addition, life cycle repair cost of BRKBTMF was assessed using the next-generation performance-based earthquake engineering framework. The results confirm that BRKBTMF can effectively control the structural and non-structural component damages and minimize the repair costs of the structure under different ranges of earthquake shaking intensities. This studies conclude that BRKBTMF is a viable and effective seismic force resisting system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wongpakdee N, Leelataviwat S, Goel S C, Liao W C. Performancebased design and collapse evaluation of buckling restrained knee braced truss moment frames. Engineering Structures, 2014, 60: 23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang T Y, Li Y, Leelataviwat S. Performance-based design and optimization of buckling restrained knee brace truss moment frame. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2014, 28(6): A4014007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang T Y, Li Y, Goel S. Performance evaluation of long-span conventional moment frames and buckling-restrained knee-braced truss moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, 142 (1): 04015081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goel S C, Chao S H. Performance-Based Plastic Design: Earthquake- Resistant Steel Structures. International Code Council, USA, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  5. PEER. Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  6. Talaat M, Mosalam K M. Modeling progressive collapse in reinforced concrete buildings using direct element removal. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2009, 38(5): 609–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ASCE. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. SEI/ASCE 7–10. Reston, VA, USA, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  8. UCB. U.C. Berkeley Seismic Guideline. University of California, Berkeley, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  9. Merritt S, Uang C M, Benzoni G. Subassemblage Testing of CoreBrace Buckling Resitrained Brace. Report No. TR-2003/01, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  10. López WA, Sabelli R. Seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames. Steel tips, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  11. PEER. PEER Strong Motion Database. University of California at Berkeley, 2010 (Retrieved from http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_- ground_motion_database)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C A. Incremental Dynamic Analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang T Y, Moehle J P, Stojadinovic B. Performance Evaluation of Innovative Steel Braced Frames–PEER Report 2009/103. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang T Y, Moehle J P, Stojadinovic B, Der Kiureghian A. Seismic performance evaluation of facilities: Methodology and implementation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009, 135(10): 1146–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Applied Technology Council. Development of next-generation performance-based seismic design procedures for new and existing buildings, 2012 (https://www.atcouncil.org/projects-sp- 1235934887/project-atc58)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony T. Y. Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, T.T.Y., Li, Y. Performance assessment of innovative seismic resilient steel knee braced frame. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 10, 291–302 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0340-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0340-3

Keywords

Navigation