Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 438–444 | Cite as

Numerical modeling of cavitation on spillway’s flip bucket

  • Abbas Parsaie
  • Sadegh Dehdar-Behbahani
  • Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi
Research Article

Abstract

Numerical modeling of hydraulic phenomenon by computational fluid dynamic (CFD) approaches is one of the main parts in the high cost hydraulic structure studies. In this paper, using Flow 3D as CFD commercial tool, the cavitation phenomenon was assessed along spillway's flip bucket of the Balaroud dam. Performance of numerical modeling was compared to the physical model, which was constructed to this purpose. During numerical modeling, it was found that RNG turbulence model is a suitable performance for modeling the cavitation. Physical modeling shows that minimum cavitation index is about 0.85 and minimum cavitation index based on Flow 3D results is about 0.665, which was related to the flood discharge with return period of 10000 years. The main difference between numerical and physical modeling is related to the head of velocity, which is considered in physical modeling. Results of numerical simulation show that occurrence of cavitation based on cavitation index equal to 0.25 is not possible along the spillway.

Keywords

cavitation Index numerical simulation spillway’s flip Bucket CFD Balaroud Dam physical modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ettema R. Hydraulic Modeling: Concepts and Practice. ASCE, 2000Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chau K W. Modelling for Coastal Hydraulics and Engineering. Taylor & Francis, 2010Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fattor C, Bacchiega J. Design Conditions for Morning-Glory Spillways: Application to Potrerillos Dam Spillway. In: Advances in Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2009, 2123–2128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gourbesville P, Cunge J, Caignaert G. Advances in Hydroinformatics: SIMHYDRO 2012–New Frontiers of Simulation. Springer Singapore Pte. Limited, 2013Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parsaie A, Haghiabi A. The effect of predicting discharge coefficient by neural network on increasing the numerical modeling accuracy of flow over side weir. Water Resources Management, 2015, 29(4): 973–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parsaie A, Yonesi H, Najafian S. Predictive modeling of discharge in compound open channel by support vector machine technique. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2015, 1(2): 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parsaie A, Haghiabi A, Moradinejad A. CFD modeling of flow pattern in spillway’s approach channel. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 2015, 1(3): 245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parsaie A, Haghiabi A. Computational Modeling of Pollution Transmission in Rivers. Applied Water Science, 2015, 1–10Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parsaie A, Haghiabi A. Predicting the longitudinal dispersion coefficient by radial basis function neural network. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2015, 1(4): 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parsaie A, Yonesi H, Najafian S. Predictive modeling of discharge in compound open channel by support vector machine technique. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2015, 1(1–2): 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim D, Park J. Analysis of flow structure over ogee-spillway in consideration of scale and roughness effects by using CFD model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2005, 9(2): 161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gessler D. CFD modeling of spillway performance. In: Proc. World Water and Environmental Resources Congress. May, 2005Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aydin M C. CFD simulation of free-surface flow over triangular labyrinth side weir. Advances in Engineering Software, 2012, 45(1): 159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson M C, Savage B M. Physical and numerical comparison of flow over ogee spillway in the presence of tailwater. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 132(12): 1353–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chanson H. Design of weirs and spillways, in Hydraulics of Open Channel Flow. 2nd ed. Chanson H, 2004, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004, 19: 391–430Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu J, Ma F. Cavity flow regime for spillway aerators. Science China Technological Sciences, 2013, 56(4): 818–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dong Z Y, Chen L, Ju W J. Cavitation characteristics of high velocity flow with and without aeration on the order of 50 m/s. Journal of Hydrodynamics. Ser. B, 2007, 19(4): 429–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chatila J, Tabbara M. Computational modeling of flow over an ogee spillway. Computers & Structures, 2004, 82(22): 1805–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Toloshinov A V, et al. Development of the design for the No. 2 spillway at the Boguchany hydroproject. Power Technology and Engineering, 2009, 43(3): 135–142Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Szymkiewicz R. Numerical Modeling in Open Channel Hydraulics. Springer, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kirkgoz M S, Akoz M S, Oner A A. Numerical modeling of flow over a chute spillway. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2009, 47(6): 790–797CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lv J, Liu M. Research to the Stilling Basin Types of the Spillway Outlet. In: Advances in Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, 1536–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aydin M C, Ozturk M. Verification and validation of a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model for air entrainment at spillway aerators. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2009, 36(5): 826–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Erfanain-Azmoudeh M H, Kamanbedast A A. Determine the appropriate location of aerator system on Gotvandoliadam’s spillway using Flow 3D. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 2013, 13(3): 378–383Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chanel P G, Doering J C. Assessment of spillway modeling using computational fluid dynamics. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2008, 35(12): 1481–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abbas Parsaie
    • 1
  • Sadegh Dehdar-Behbahani
    • 2
  • Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of water EngineeringLorestan UniversityKhorramabadIran
  2. 2.Hydro StructuresShahid Chamran UniversityAhvazIran

Personalised recommendations