Skip to main content
Log in

Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model on determination of optimized pile-type

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pile-type selection is a very important stage of foundation design, and there are many field factors influencing the decision of pile-type selection. Since there is a limitation of traditional “major factors method” to satisfy the requirement of modern foundation construction, this study presents an efficient approach, in which analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is employed. AHP is a multiple criteria decision-making tool that has been applied in many fields related to the decision-making, e.g., in the field of economics, marketing, sociology, etc. However, it is rarely reported that AHP is applied in the field of civil engineering for decision making. In this study, AHP combined with fuzzy synthetic evaluation method is employed to select the type of pile used as the foundation of a residential building in Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China. The results show that fuzzy AHP approach is an easy and efficient way for pile-type selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meng Xiaohong, Fang Cong, Luo Jie. Selection of piles type on fuzzy optimization method. Journal of Guangxi University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 30(3): 207–210 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980, 334

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Golden B L, Wasil E A, Levy D E. Application of the analytic hierarchy process: A categorized, annotated bibliography. In: Golden B L, et al, eds. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Application and studies. Heidelberg: Springer, 1989, 37–58

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bottero M, Mondini G. Towards the sustainability in mining wastes management: An application of the analytic herarchy process. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Industrial Minerals and Building Stones. Istanbul, 2003

  5. Brandon P, Lombardi P, Bentivegna V. Evaluation of the Built Environment for Sustainability. London: Chapman and Hall, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nijkamp P, Rietveld P, Voogd H. Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  7. Voogd H. Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning. London: Pion, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lai V, Wong, B K, Cheung, W. Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in the software selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 137(1): 134–144

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Shouyu. Fuzzy Decision Theory and Application. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology Press, 1994, 312 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feng Qian. Research on design and optimum-method of supporting structure for deep foundation excavation. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2006 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cheung A. Expert system for aircraft maintenance services industry. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 2005, 11(4): 348–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun J G, Ge P Q, Liu Z C. Two-grade fuzzy synthetic decision-making system with use of an analytic hierarchy process for performance evaluation of grinding fluids. Tribology International, 2001, 34(10): 683–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bascetin A. A decision support using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open-pit mine. Environmental Geology, 2007, 52(4): 663–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Jinhui. Study of decision-making on the design of pile foundation in soft deposit based on GIS. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2008 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Jinhui, Shen Shuilong. Software of decision-making on the selection of pile foundation in soft deposit. The People’s Republic of China State Intellectual Property Office, 2008 (in Chinese)

  16. China Academy of Building Research. Technical Code for Building Pile Foundation of building (JGJ 94-94). 1994, 278 (in Chinese)

  17. China Architecture and Building Press. Technical Code for building foundation (DBJ 13-07-2006), 2006, 185 (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuilong Shen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, L., Shen, S., Zhang, J. et al. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model on determination of optimized pile-type. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 4, 252–257 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-010-0017-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-010-0017-2

Keywords

Navigation