Skip to main content
Log in

General framework for bridge life cycle design

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a detailed illustration for bridge life cycle design which comprises the processes of service life design, aesthetics design, performance design, environmental and ecological design, inspection, maintenance and repair design as well as cost analysis, this paper presented a general framework for bridge life cycle design comprising three design phases and six design processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen Airong, Ma Junhai. Whole life design methods and key issues of bridges. In: Symposium of Youth Forum for China Highway Science and Technology. Beijing: China Communication Press, 2005, 168–184 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frangopol D M. Bridge Safety and Reliability. Reston, Virginia: ASCE, 1999, 210–236

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hugh H. NCHRP Report 483- Bridge Life Cycle Cost Analysis (BLCCA). Washington DC: Transportation Research Board (TRB), 2003

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Noortwijk J M, Klatter H E. The use of lifetime distributions in bridge maintenance and replacement modeling. Computers and structures, 2004, 82(13–14): 1091–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van Noortwijk J M, Frangopol D M. Two probabilistic life-cycle maintenance models for deteriorating civil infrastructures. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 19: 345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Das P C. Prioritization of Bridge Maintenance Needs. In: Frangopol DM, ed. Case Studies in Optimal Design and Maintenance Planning of Civil Infrastructure Systems. Reston, Virginia: ASCE, 1999, 26–44

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kong J S, Frangopol D M, Gharaibeh E S. Life prediction of highway bridges with or without preventive maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 8th ASCE Special Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hitoshi F. Life-cycle cost based maintenance of infrastructure systems considering prediction uncertainties. In: Frangopol D M, Hitoshi Furuta, eds. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis and Design of Civil Infrastructure Systems. Reston: ASCE, 2001, 120–129

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frangopol D M. Preventative Maintenance Strategies for Bridge Groups-Analysis. London, UK: Final Report to the Highways Agency, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frangopol D M. Optimum Maintenance Strategies for Different Bridge Types: Project Description and Steel/Concrete Composite Bridges. London, UK: Final Report to the Highways Agency, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frangopol D M, Kong J S, Gharaibeh E S. Reliability-based lifecycle management of highway bridges. Journal of Computing Civil Engineering, ASCE, 2001, 15(1): 27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frangopol D M, Min L. Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and lifecycle cost. In: Cheung M S, Chang C C, eds. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Integrated Life-Cycle Management of Infrastructures, HKUST, Hong Kong. 2004, 2–18

    Google Scholar 

  13. van Noortwijk J M. Optimal replacement decisions for structures under stochastic deterioration. In: Nowak A S, ed. Proceedings of the Eighth IFIP WG 7.5 Working Conference on Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems, Kraków, Poland, 1998. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1998, 273–80

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frangopol D M, Gharaibeh E S, Kong J S, Miyake M. Optimal network-level bridge maintenance planning based on minimum expected cost. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record, 2000, 2(1696): 26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kong J S, Frangopol D M. Life-cycle reliability-based maintenance cost optimization of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 818–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarja A. Integrated life cycle design as a key tool for sustainable construction. In: Sarja A, ed. Integrated Life Cycle Design of Materials and Structures INCDES 2000, RILEM Proceedings PRO 14. Helsinki: RIL-Association of Finnish Civil Engineers, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sarja A. Integrated Life Cycle Design of Structures. New York: Taylor & Hancis Group, 2002, 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leonhardt F. Bridges Aesthetics and Design. Beijing: China Communication Press, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen Airong, Sheng Yong, Qian Feng. Form of Bridges. Beijing: China Communication Press, 2005, 63–64 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. He Pizhuang. Bridge Aesthetics. Beijing: China Communication Press, 1999, 196–197 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junhai Ma.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2007, 35 (8): 1003–1007 [译自: 同济大学学报(自然科学版)]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, J., Chen, A. & He, J. General framework for bridge life cycle design. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 3, 50–56 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-009-0004-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-009-0004-7

Keywords

Navigation