Three-dimensional stability analysis of the dam foundation at Baise

Research Article

Abstract

It is usually difficult to determine the actual safety factors of rock masses in an ordinary two-dimensional stability analysis if the safety factors of the different cross sections in the rock mass vary significantly. In addition to the actual slope, arch dam abutment, and the actual foundation of a high building, another example is that the different cross sections of the foundation in the monolith of a gravity dam vary significantly, just like the condition at the overflow dam in the Baise project. A three-dimensional stability analysis method based on the upper-bound theorem was employed to solve this problem. The parameters used in the analysis were obtained from geomechanics tests, as well as continuity simulations of the randomly distributed joints. Two failure patterns against sliding are analyzed. One pattern is the foundation slide along deep-seated planes which were determined by calculations. The other pattern is the foundation slide along the planes across the bottom of the high steps in the foundation pit. The results indicate that a special overflow dam monolith can be considered to be safe in case of considering the three dimensional effect. However, a key wall with a depth of 5m must be constructed at the upper side of this monolith in order to ensure the safety of the foundation.

Keywords

hydraulic engineering foundation stability against deep sliding three-dimensional analysis upper-bound theorem 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kachanov L M. Foundations of the Theory of Plasticity. London: North-Holland Publication Company-Amsterdam, 1971MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen Z Y, Wang X G, Haberfield C, et al. A three-dimensional slope stability analysis method using the upper bound theorem (Part I): Theory and Methods. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2001, 38(3): 369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen Z Y, Wang X G, Haberfield C, et al. A three-dimensional slope stability analysis method using the upper bound theorem (Part II): Numerical approaches, applications and extensions. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2001, 38(3): 379–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mi H L, Chen Z Y, Zhang F M, et al. The 3D limit method for slope stability analysis and applications. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2002, 23(5): 651–653 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang X G, Chen Z Y, Liu S W. Determination of joint persistence and shear strength parameters of rock masses by Monte Carlo method. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1992, 11(4): 345–355 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower ResearchBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations