Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Operando modeling and measurements: Powerful tools for revealing the mechanism of alkali carbonate-based sorbents for CO2 capture in real conditions

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alkali carbonate-based sorbents (ACSs), including Na2CO3- and K2CO3-based sorbents, are promising for CO2 capture. However, the complex sorbent components and operation conditions lead to the versatile kinetics of CO2 sorption on these sorbents. This paper proposed that operando modeling and measurements are powerful tools to understand the mechanism of sorbents in real operating conditions, facilitating the sorbent development, reactor design, and operation parameter optimization. It reviewed the theoretical simulation achievements during the development of ACSs. It elucidated the findings obtained by utilizing density functional theory (DFT) calculations, ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations, and classical molecular dynamics (CMD) simulations as well. The hygroscopicity of sorbent and the humidity of gas flow are crucial to shifting the carbonation reaction from the gas—solid mode to the gas—liquid mode, boosting the kinetics. Moreover, it briefly introduced a machine learning (ML) approach as a promising method to aid sorbent design. Furthermore, it demonstrated a conceptual compact operando measurement system in order to understand the behavior of ACSs in the real operation process. The proposed measurement system includes a micro fluidized-bed (MFB) reactor for kinetic analysis, a multi-camera sub-system for 3D particle movement tracking, and a combined Raman and IR sub-system for solid/gas components and temperature monitoring. It is believed that this system is useful to evaluate the real-time sorbent performance, validating the theoretical prediction and promoting the industrial scale-up of ACSs for CO2 capture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hirano S, Shigemoto N, Yamada S, et al. Cyclic fixed-bed operations over K2CO3-on-carbon for the recovery of carbon dioxide under moist conditions. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1995, 68(3): 1030–1035

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hayashi H, Taniuchi J, Furuyashiki N, et al. Efficient recovery of carbon dioxide from flue gases of coal-fired power plants by cyclic fixed-bed operations over K2CO3-on-carbon. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1998, 37(1): 185–191

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liang Y, Harrison D P, Gupta R P, et al. Carbon dioxide capture using dry sodium-based sorbents. Energy & Fuels, 2004, 18(2): 569–575

    Google Scholar 

  4. Green D A, Turk B S, Gupta R P, et al. Capture of carbon dioxide from flue gas using solid regenerable sorbents. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 2004, 4(1/2): 53–67

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao C, Chen X, Anthony E J, et al. Capturing CO2 in flue gas from fossil fuel-fired power plants using dry regenerable alkali metal-based sorbent. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2013, 39(6): 515–534

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu Y, Chen X, Ma J, et al. System integration for coal-fired power plant with post combustion CO2 capture: Comparative study for different solid dry sorbents. Fuel, 2020, 280: 118561

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ju Y, Lee C H. Dynamic modeling of a dual fluidized-bed system with the circulation of dry sorbent for CO2 capture. Applied Energy, 2019, 241: 640–651

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ma J, Zhong J, Bao X, et al. Continuous CO2 capture performance of K2CO3/Al2O3 sorbents in a novel two-stage integrated bubbling-transport fluidized reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 404: 126465

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luis P. Use of monoethanolamine (MEA) for CO2 capture in a global scenario: Consequences and alternatives. Desalination, 2016, 380: 93–99

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xie W, Chen X, Ma J, et al. Energy analyses and process integration of coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using sodium-based dry sorbents. Applied Energy, 2019, 252: 113434

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu Y, Chen X, Ma J, et al. System integration optimization for coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture by Na2CO3 dry sorbents. Energy, 2020, 211: 118554

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bonaventura D, Chacartegui R, Valverde J M, et al. Carbon capture and utilization for sodium bicarbonate production assisted by solar thermal power. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 149: 860–874

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bonaventura D, Chacartegui R, Valverde J M, et al. Dry carbonate process for CO2 capture and storage: Integration with solar thermal power. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82: 1796–1812

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reynolds A J, Verheyen T V, Adeloju S B, et al. Towards commercial scale postcombustion capture of CO2 with monoethanolamine solvent: Key considerations for solvent management and environmental impacts. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(7): 3643–3654

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao C, Chen X, Zhao C, et al. Carbonation and hydration characteristics of dry potassium-based sorbents for CO2 capture. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(3): 1766–1769

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dong W, Chen X, Wu Y, et al. Carbonation characteristics of dry sodium-based sorbents for CO2 capture. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(9): 6040–6046

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bararpour S T, Karami D, Mahinpey N. Post-combustion CO2 capture using supported K2CO3: Comparing physical mixing and incipient wetness impregnation preparation methods. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2018, 137: 319–328

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chaiwang S C, Sema T, et al. Statistical experimental design for carbon dioxide capture in circulating fluidized bed using computational fluid dynamics simulation: Effect of operating parameters. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 2020, 23(2): 303–317

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao C, Chen X, Zhao C. Effect of crystal structure on CO2 capture characteristics of dry potassium-based sorbents. Chemosphere, 2009, 75(10): 1401–1404

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ryu D Y, Jo S, Kim T Y, et al. CO2 sorption and regeneration properties of K2CO3/Al2O3-based sorbent at high pressure and moderate temperature. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2022, 12(6): 2989

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bararpour S T, Karami D, Mahinpey N. Utilization of mesoporous alumina-based supports synthesized by a surfactant-assisted technique for post-combustion CO2 capture. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(4): 105661

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khuong D A, Trinh K T, Nakaoka Y, et al. The investigation of activated carbon by K2CO3 activation: Micropores-and macropores-dominated structure. Chemosphere, 2022, 299: 134365

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kazemi H, Shahhosseini S, Bazyari A, et al. A study on the effects of textural properties of γ-Al2O3 support on CO2 capture capacity of Na2CO3. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 138: 176–185

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dong W, Chen X, Yu F, et al. Na2CO3/MgO/Al2O3 solid sorbents for low-temperature CO2 capture. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(2): 968–973

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen X, Dong W, Yu F. CO2 capture using dry TiO2-doped Na2CO3/Al2O3 sorbents in a fluidized-bed reactor. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 31(2): 200–225

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu Y, Cai T, Zhao W, et al. First-principles and experimental studies of [ZrO(OH)]+ or ZrO(OH)2 for enhancing CO2 desorption kinetics-imperative for significant reduction of CO2 capture energy consumption. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2018, 6(36): 17671–17681

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nasiman T, Kanoh H. CO2 capture by a K2CO3-carbon composite under moist conditions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(8): 3405–3412

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cai T, Chen X, Zhong J, et al. Understanding the morphology of supported Na2CO3/γ-AlOOH solid sorbent and its CO2 sorption performance. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 395: 124139

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kim K, Yang S, Lee J B, et al. Analysis of K2CO3/Al2O3 CO2 sorbent tested with coal-fired power plant flue gas: Effect of SOx. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012, 9: 347–354

    Google Scholar 

  30. Duan Y, Zhang B, Sorescu D C, et al. CO2 capture properties of M-C-O-H (M=Li, Na, K) systems: A combined density functional theory and lattice phonon dynamics study. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2011, 184(2): 304–311

    Google Scholar 

  31. Duan Y, Zhang B, Sorescu D C, et al. Density functional theory studies on the electronic, structural, phonon dynamical and thermo-stability properties of bicarbonates MHCO3, M = Li, Na, K. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, 2012, 24(32): 325501–325516

    Google Scholar 

  32. Duan Y, Luebke D R, Pennline H W, et al. Ab initio thermodynamic study of the CO2 capture properties of potassium carbonate sesquihydrate, K2CO3·1.5H2O. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012, 116(27): 14461–14470

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu W, Wu Y, Cai T, et al. A molding method of Na2CO3/Al2O3 sorbents with high sphericity and low roughness for enhanced attrition resistance in CO2 sorption/desorption process via extrusion-spheronization method. Powder Technology, 2020, 366: 520–526

    Google Scholar 

  34. Luo H, Chioyama H, Thürmer S, et al. Kinetics and structural changes in CO2 capture of K2CO3 under a moist condition. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(7): 4472–4478

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jayakumar A, Gomez A, Mahinpey N. Post-combustion CO2 capture using solid K2CO3: Discovering the carbonation reaction mechanism. Applied Energy, 2016, 179: 531–543

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jaiboon O, Chalermsinsuwan B, Mekasut L, et al. Effect of flow patterns/regimes on CO2 capture using K2CO3 solid sorbent in fluidized bed/circulating fluidized bed. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 219: 262–272

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nimvari M I, Zarghami R, Rashtchian D. Experimental investigation of bubble behavior in gas-solid fluidized bed. Advanced Powder Technology, 2020, 31(7): 2680–2688

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gao H, Pishney S, Janik M J. First principles study on the adsorption of CO2 and H2O on the K2CO3(001) surface. Surface Science, 2013, 609: 140–146

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liu H, Qin Q, Zhang R, et al. Insights into the mechanism of the capture of CO2 by K2CO3 sorbent: A DFT study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2017, 19(35): 24357–24368

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shi X, Lin X, Luo R, et al. Dynamics of heterogeneous catalytic processes at operando conditions. JACS Au, 2021, 1(12): 2100–2120

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cai T, Chen X, Johnson J K, et al. Understanding and improving the kinetics of bulk carbonation on sodium carbonate. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2020, 124(42): 23106–23115

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cai T, Johnson J K, Wu Y, et al. Toward understanding the kinetics of CO2 capture on sodium carbonate. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(9): 9033–9041

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao W, Wu Y, Cai T, et al. Density functional theory and reactive dynamics study of catalytic performance of TiO2 on CO2 desorption process with KHCO3/TiO2/Al2O3 sorbent. Molecular Catalysis, 2017, 439143–439154

  44. Iftimie R, Minary P, Tuckerman M E. Ab initio molecular dynamics: Concepts, recent developments, and future trends. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(19): 6654–6659

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cai T, Chen X, Tang H, et al. Unraveling the disparity of CO2 sorption on alkali carbonates under high humidity. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2021, 53: 101737

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rubasinghege G, Grassian V H, 0.Role(s) of adsorbed water in the surface chemistry of environmental interfaces. Chemical Communications (Cambridge), 2013, 49(30): 3071–3094

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang L, Lu Y, Rostam-Abadi M. Sintering of calcium oxide (CaO) during CO2 chemisorption: A reactive molecular dynamics study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2012, 14(48): 16633–16643

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lan G, Li J, Zhang G, et al. Thermal decomposition mechanism study of 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO): Combined TG-FTIR-MS techniques and ReaxFF reactive molecular dynamics simulations. Fuel, 2021, 295: 120655

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yu K, Tang H, Cai T, et al. Mechanism of kaolinite’s influence on sodium release characteristics of high-sodium coal under oxysteam combustion conditions. Fuel, 2021, 290: 119812

    Google Scholar 

  50. Borodin O, Olguin M, Spear C E, et al. Towards high throughput screening of electrochemical stability of battery electrolytes. Nanotechnology, 2015, 26(35): 354003

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wang M, Xu Q, Tang H, et al. Machine learning-enabled prediction and high-throughput screening of polymer membranes for pervaporation separation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(6): 8427–8436

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lv X, Wei W, Huang B, et al. High-throughput screening of synergistic transition metal dual-atom catalysts for efficient nitrogen fixation. Nano Letters, 2021, 21(4): 1871–1878

    Google Scholar 

  53. Li J, Gong J. Operando characterization techniques for electrocatalysis. Energy & Environmental Science, 2020, 13(11): 3748–3779

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yang Y, Xiong Y, Zeng R, et al. Operando methods in electrocatalysis. ACS Catalysis, 2021, 11(3): 1136–1178

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dong X, Cui Z, Sun Y, et al. Humidity-independent photocatalytic toluene mineralization benefits from the utilization of edge hydroxyls in layered double hydroxides (LDHs): A combined operando and theoretical investigation. ACS Catalysis, 2021, 11(13): 8132–8139

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chakrabarti A, Ford M E, Gregory D, et al. A decade+ of operando spectroscopy studies. Catalysis Today, 2017, 283: 27–53

    Google Scholar 

  57. Peltzer D, Múnera J, Cornaglia L. The effect of the Li:Na molar ratio on the structural and sorption properties of mixed zirconates for CO2 capture at high temperature. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 102927

    Google Scholar 

  58. Braglia L, Fracchia M, Ghigna P, et al. Understanding solid-gas reaction mechanisms by operando soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy at ambient pressure. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2020, 124(26): 14202–14212

    Google Scholar 

  59. Yan J, Shen T, Wang P, et al. Redox performance of manganese ore in a fluidized bed thermogravimetric analyzer for chemical looping combustion. Fuel, 2021, 295: 120564

    Google Scholar 

  60. Liu L, Li Z, Li Z, et al. Fast redox kinetics of a perovskite oxygen carrier measured using micro-fluidized bed thermogravimetric analysis. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2021, 38(4): 5259–5269

    Google Scholar 

  61. Yu J, Zeng X, Zhang G, et al. Kinetics and mechanism of direct reaction between CO2 and Ca(OH)2 in micro fluidized bed. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(13): 7514–7520

    Google Scholar 

  62. Li Y, Li Z, Wang H, et al. CaO carbonation kinetics determined using micro-fluidized bed thermogravimetric analysis. Fuel, 2020, 264: 116823

    Google Scholar 

  63. Zhou W, Zhang Y, Chen B, et al. Sensitivity analysis and measurement uncertainties of a two-camera depth from defocus imaging system. Experiments in Fluids, 2021, 62(11): 224

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hess C. New advances in using Raman spectroscopy for the characterization of catalysts and catalytic reactions. Chemical Society Reviews, 2021, 50(5): 3519–3564

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Shanghai Sailing Program (Grant No. 22YF1429600), and the Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Carbon Emission Peak and Carbon Neutrality of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20220001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianyi Cai.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, T., Wang, M., Chen, X. et al. Operando modeling and measurements: Powerful tools for revealing the mechanism of alkali carbonate-based sorbents for CO2 capture in real conditions. Front. Energy 17, 380–389 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-023-0872-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-023-0872-x

Keywords

Navigation