Frontiers in Energy

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 99–106 | Cite as

A novel flow-resistor network model for characterizing enhanced geothermal system heat reservoir

  • Jian Guo
  • Wenjiong Cao
  • Yiwei Wang
  • Fangming JiangEmail author
Research Article


The fracture characteristics of a heat reservoir are of critical importance to enhanced geothermal systems, which can be investigated by theoretical modeling. This paper presents the development of a novel flow-resistor network model to describe the hydraulic processes in heat reservoirs. The fractures in the reservoir are simplified by using flow resistors and the typically complicated fracture network of the heat reservoir is converted into a flow-resistor network with a reasonably simple pattern. For heat reservoirs with various fracture configurations, the corresponding flow-resistor networks are identical in terms of framework though the networks may have different section numbers and the flow resistors may have different values. In this paper, numerous cases of different section numbers and resistor values are calculated and the results indicate that the total number of flow resistances between the injection and production wells is primarily determined by the number of fractures in the reservoir. It is also observed that a linear dependence of the total flow resistance on the number of fractures and the relation is obtained by the best fit of the calculation results. Besides, it performs a case study dealing with the Soultz enhanced geothermal system (EGS). In addition, the fracture numbers underneath specific well systems are derived. The results provide insight on the tortuosity of the flow path between different wells.


enhanced geothermal systems flow-resistor network model fracture characteristics heat reservoir 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51406213) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (Grant No. S2013040013967).


  1. 1.
    An MIT-Led Interdisciplinary Panel (chaired by J.W. Tester). The Future of Geothermal Energy, Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century. 2006,
  2. 2.
    Ghassemi A, Tarasovs S, Cheng H A D A. 3-D study of the effects of thermomechanical loads on fracture slip in enhanced geothermal reservoirs. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(8): 1132–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Simone S, Vilarrasa V, Carrera J, Alcolea A, Meier P. Thermal coupling may control mechanical stability of geothermal reservoirs during cold water injection. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Parts A/B/C, 2013, 64(64): 117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Valley B, Evans K F. Stress state at Soultz-sous-Forêts to 5 km depth from wellbore failure and hydraulic observations. In: Proceedings of 32nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, 2007Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Genter A, Cuenot N, Dezayes C, Sausse J, Valley B, Baumgartner J, Fritsch D. How a better characterization of a deep crystalline reservoir can contribute to improve EGS performance at Soultz. In: 1st European Geothermal Review, Geothermal Energy for Electric Power Production, Germany, 2007Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Valley B, Dezayes C, Genter A. Multiscale fracturing in the Soultzsous-Forêts basement from borehole image analyses. In: Proceedings EHDRA Scientific Conference, France, 2007Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dezayes C, Genter A, Valley B. Structure of the low permeable naturally fractured geothermal reservoir at Soultz. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 2010, 342(7–8): 517–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dezayes C, Genter A, Valley B. Overview of the fracture network at different scales within the granite reservoir of the EGS Soultz site (Alsace, France). In: World Geothermal Congress, 2010, 96(8): 4928–4937Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baria1 R, Michelet S, Baumgaertner J, Dyer B, Gerard A, Nicholls J, Hettkamp T, Teza D, Soma N, Asanuma H, Garnish J, Megel T. Microseismic monitoring of the world’s largest potential HDR reservoir. In: 29th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, 2004Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cuenot N, Dorbath C, Dorbath L. Analysis of the microseismicity induced by fluid injections at the EGS site of Soultz-sous-Forêts (Alsace, France): implications for the characterization of the geothermal reservoir properties. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2008, 165(5): 797–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dorbath L, Cuenot N, Genter A, Frogneux M. Seismic response of the fractured and faulted granite of Soultz-sous-Forêts (France) to 5 km deep massive water injections. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2009, 177(2): 653–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dyer B C. Soultz GPK2 stimulation June/July 2000. Seismic Monitoring Field Report, 2000Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanjuan B, Pinault J, Rose P, Gerard A, Brach M, Braibant G, Crouzet C, Foucher J, Gautier A, Touzelet S. Tracer testing of the geothermal heat exchanger at Soultz-sous-Forêts (France) between 2000 and 2005. Geothermics, 2006, 35(5–6): 622–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vogt C, Kosack C, Marquart G. Stochastic inversion of the tracer experiment of the enhanced geothermal system demonstration reservoir in Soultz-sous-Forêts—revealing pathways and estimating permeability distribution. Geothermics, 2012, 42(42): 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Radilla G, Sausse J, Sanjuan B, Fourar M. Interpreting tracer tests in the enhanced geothermal system (EGS) of Soultz-sous-Forêts using the equivalent stratified medium approach. Geothermics, 2012, 44: 43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hicks TW, Pine R J,Willis-Richards J, Xu S, Jupe A J, Rodrigues N E V. A hydro-thermo-mechanical numerical model for HDR geothermal reservoir evaluation. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1996, 33(5): 499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Swenson D, Duteau R, Sprecker T. Modelling flow in a jointed geothermal reservoir. In: World Geothermal Congress, 1995, 2553–2558Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kolditz O, Diersch H J. Quasi-steady state strategy for numerical simulation of geothermal circulation in hot dry rock fractures. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics, 1993, 28(4): 467–481CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruel D, Cacas M C. Numerical Modeling Technique: Contribution to the Soultz HDR Project. New York: Gordon & Breach, 1992Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lanyon G W, Batchelor A S. Modelling for the UK hot dry rock programme using the fracture network method: summary report. Geoscience Report, 1992, 59: 5–78Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Watanabe K, Takahashi H. A model analysis of the long-term performance of hot dry rock geothermal energy extractions systems. In: Proceedings of the JSME-ASME International Conference on Power Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 1993:453–458Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kolditz O. Modelling flow and heat transfer in fractured rocks: dimensional effect of matrix heat diffusion. Geothermics, 1995, 24 (3): 421–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bruel D. Heat extraction modelling from forced fluid flow through stimulated fractured rock masses: application to the Rosemanowes hot dry rock reservoir. Geothermics, 1995, 24(3): 361–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kolditz O, Clauser C. Numerical simulation of flow and heat transfer in fractured crystalline rocks: application to the hot dry rock site in Rosemanowes (U.K.). Geothermics, 1998, 27(1): 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shaik A R, Rahman S S, Tran N, Tran T. Numerical simulation of fluid-rock coupling heat transfer in naturally fractured geothermal system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(10): 1600–1606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang Y, Yeh H. Modeling heat extraction from hot dry rock in a multi-well system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(8–9): 1676–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gelet R, Loret B, Khalili N. A thermo-hydro-mechanical coupled model in local thermal non-equilibrium for fractured HDR reservoir with double porosity. Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth, 2012, 117(B7): 205–228Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kalinina E, McKenna S, Hadgu T, Lowry T. Analysis of the effects of heterogeneity on heat extraction in an EGS represented with the continuum fracture model. Cochlear Implants International, 2012, 5 (S1): 132–134Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jiang F M, Luo L, Chen J L. A novel three-dimensional transient model for subsurface heat exchange in enhanced geothermal systems. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 41(1): 57–62Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jiang F M, Chen J L, Huang W B, Luo L. A three-dimensional transient model for EGS subsurface thermo-hydraulic process. Energy, 2014, 72(7): 300–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cao W J, Huang W B, Jiang F M. Numerical study on variable thermophysical properties of heat transfer fluid affecting EGS heat extraction. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 92: 1205–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Clayton T C, Donald F E, John A R. Engineering Fluid Mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc, 2001Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Genter A, Traineau H. Analysis of macroscopic fractures in granite in the HDR geothermal well ESP-1, Soultz-sous-Forêts, France. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 1996, 72(1–2): 121–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jian Guo
    • 1
  • Wenjiong Cao
    • 1
  • Yiwei Wang
    • 1
  • Fangming Jiang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratory of Advanced Energy Systems of CAS Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, and Guangdong Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Energy Research and Development, Guangzhou Institute of Energy ConversionChinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)GuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations