Multi-objective optimization in a finite time thermodynamic method for dish-Stirling by branch and bound method and MOPSO algorithm

  • Mohammad Reza Nazemzadegan
  • Alibakhsh Kasaeian
  • Somayeh Toghyani
  • Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi
  • R. Saidur
  • Tingzhen Ming
Research Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

There are various analyses for a solar system with the dish-Stirling technology. One of those analyses is the finite time thermodynamic analysis by which the total power of the system can be obtained by calculating the process time. In this study, the convection and radiation heat transfer losses from collector surface, the conduction heat transfer between hot and cold cylinders, and cold side heat exchanger have been considered. During this investigation, four objective functions have been optimized simultaneously, including power, efficiency, entropy, and economic factors. In addition to the fourobjective optimization, three-objective, two-objective, and single-objective optimizations have been done on the dish- Stirling model. The algorithm of multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) with post-expression of preferences is used for multi-objective optimizations while the branch and bound algorithm with pre-expression of preferences is used for single-objective and multi-objective optimizations. In the case of multi-objective optimizations with post-expression of preferences, Pareto optimal front are obtained, afterward by implementing the fuzzy, LINMAP, and TOPSIS decision making algorithms, the single optimum results can be achieved. The comparison of the results shows the benefits of MOPSO in optimizing dish Stirling finite time thermodynamic equations.

Keywords

dish-Stirling finite time model branch and bound algorithm multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    EIA. International Energy outlook. 2011–09, https://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/howard_09192011.pdfGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Curzon F L, Ahlborn B. Efficiency of a Carnot engine at maximum power output. American Journal of Physics, 1975, 43(1): 22–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moran M J. On second law analysis and the failed promises of finite time thermodynamics. Energy, 1998, 23(6): 517–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gyftopoulos E P. Fundamentals of analysis of processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 1997, 38(15–17): 1525–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tlili I, Timoumi Y, Nasrallah S B. Thermodynamic analysis of the Stirling heat engine with regenerative losses and internal irreversibilities. International Journal of Engine Research, 2008, 9(1): 45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaushik S C, Kumar S. Finite time thermodynamic evaluation of irreversible Ericsson and Stirling heat engines. Energy Conversion and Management, 2001, 42(3): 295–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaushik S C, Kumar S. Finite time thermodynamic analysis of endoreversible Stirling heat engine with regenerative losses. Energy, 2000, 25(10): 989–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaushik S C, Tyagi S K, Bose S K, Singhal M K. Performance evaluation of irreversible Stirling and Ericsson heat pump cycles. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2002, 41(2): 193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Costea M, Petrescu S, Harman C. The effect of irreversibilities on solar Stirling engine cycle performance. Energy Conversion and Management, 1999, 40(15–16): 1723–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Urieli I, Kushnir M. The ideal adiabatic cycle-a rational basis for Stirling engine analysis. In: Proceeding of 17th IECEC, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1982Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu F, Chen L, Wu C, Sun F. Optimum performance of irreversible Stirling engine with imperfect regeneration. Energy Conversion and Management, 1998, 39(8): 727–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petrescu S, Costea M, Harman C, Florea T. Application of the direct method to irreversible Stirling cycles with finite speed. International Journal of Energy Research, 2002, 26(7): 589–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Timoumi Y, Tlili I, Ben Nasrallah S. Design and performance optimization of GPU-3 Stirling engines. Energy, 2008, 33(7): 1100–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cheng C H, Yu Y J. Numerical model for predicting thermodynamic cycle and thermal efficiency of a beta-type Stirling engine with rhombic-drive mechanism. Renewable Energy, 2010, 35(11): 2590–2601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ataer O E. Numerical analysis of regenerators of piston type Stirling engines using Lagrangian formulation. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2002, 25(5): 640–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tlili I. Finite time thermodynamic evaluation of endoreversible Stirling heat engine at maximum power conditions. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(4): 2234–2241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Formosa F, Despesse G. Analytical model for Stirling cycle machine design. Energy Conversion and Management, 2010, 51(10): 1855–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Formosa F. Coupled thermodynamic-dynamic semi-analytical model of free piston Stirling engines. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52(5): 2098–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iwamoto I, Toda K, Hirata K, Takeuchi M, Yamamoto T. Comparison of low and high temperature differential Stirling engines. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Stirling engine conference, Anacona, Italy, 1997Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    AhmadiMH, Hosseinzade H. Investigation of solar collector design parameters effect onto solar Stirling engine efficiency. Journal of Applied Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 1(01): 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Erbay L B, Yavuz H. Analysis of Stirling heat engine at maximum power conditions. Energy, 1997, 22(7): 645–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li Y, He Y L, Wang W W. Optimization of solar-powered Stirling heat engine with finite-time thermodynamics. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36(1): 421–427MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sharma A, Shukla S K, Rai A K. Finite time thermodynamic analysis and optimization of Solar-Dish Stirling heat engine with regenerative losses. Thermal Science, 2011, 15(4): 995–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sayyaadi H. Multi-objective approach in thermoenvironomic optimization of a benchmark cogeneration system. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(6): 867–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    AhmadiMH, Sayyaadi H, Dehghani S, Hosseinzade H. Designing a solar powered Stirling heat engine based on multiple criteria: maximized thermal efficiency and power. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 75: 282–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen C, Ho C, Yau H. Performance analysis and optimization of a solar powered Stirling engine with heat transfer considerations. Energies, 2012, 5(12): 3573–3585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jafari S, Mohammadi B, Boroujerdi A A. Multi-objective optimization of a Stirling-type pulse tube refrigerator. Cryogenics, 2013, 55–56: 53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ahmadi M H, Mohammadi A H, Dehghani S, Barranco-Jiménez M. Multi-objective thermodynamic-based optimization of output power of solar dish-Stirling engine by implementing an evolutionary algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 75: 438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ahmadi M H, Hosseinzade H, Sayyaadi H, Mohammadi A H, Kimiaghalam F. Application of the multi-objective optimization method for designing a powered Stirling g heat engine: design with maximized power, thermal efficiency and minimized pressure loss. Renewable Energy, 2013, 60: 313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ahmadi M H, Sayyaadi H, Mohammadi A H, Barranco-Jiménez M. Thermo-economic multi-objective optimization of solar dish- Stirling engine by implementing evolutionary algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 73: 370–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lazzaretto A, Toffolo A. Energy, economy and environment as objectives in multi-criterion optimization of thermal systems design. Energy, 2004, 29(8): 1139–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    AhmadiMH, AhmadiMA, Mohammadi A H, Feidt M, Pourkiaei S M. Multi-objective optimization of an irreversible Stirling cryogenic refrigerator cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 82: 351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chaitou H, Nika P. Exergetic optimization of a thermoacoustic engine using the particle swarm optimization method. Energy Conversion and Management, 2012, 55: 71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Duan C, Wang X, Shu S, Jing C, Chang H. Thermodynamic design of Stirling engine using multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 84: 88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Toghyani S, Kasaeian A, Ahmadi M H. Multi-objective optimization of Stirling engine using non-ideal adiabatic method. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 80: 54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ahmadi M H, Mehrpooya M, Pourfayaz F. Exergoeconomic analysis and multi objective optimization of performance of a carbon dioxide power cycle driven by geothermal energy with liquefied natural gas as its heat sink. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 119: 422–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ahmadi M H, Ahmadi M A, Mellit A, Pourfayaz F, Feidt M. Thermodynamic analysis and multi objective optimization of performance of solar dish Stirling engine by the centrality of entransy and entropy generation. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2016, 78: 88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ahmadi M H, Ahmadi M A, Feidt M. Thermodynamic analysis and evolutionary algorithm based on multi-objective optimization of performance for irreversible four-temperature-level refrigeration. Mechanics & Industry, 2015, 16(2): 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceeding of International Conference on Neural Networks. Perth, Australia, 1995Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Reza Nazemzadegan
    • 1
  • Alibakhsh Kasaeian
    • 1
  • Somayeh Toghyani
    • 1
  • Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi
    • 2
  • R. Saidur
    • 3
    • 4
  • Tingzhen Ming
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Renewable Energies, Faculty of New Science and TechnologiesUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and MechatronicShahrood University of TechnologyShahroodIran
  3. 3.Faculty of Science and TechnologySunway UniversityPetaling JayaMalaysia
  4. 4.Department of EngineeringLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  5. 5.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations