Skip to main content
Log in

Interactive DE for solving combined security environmental economic dispatch considering FACTS technology

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an efficient interactive differential evolution (IDE) to solve the multi-objective security environmental/economic dispatch (SEED) problem considering multi shunt flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) devices. Two sub problems are proposed. The first one is related to the active power planning to minimize the combined total fuel cost and emissions, while the second is a reactive power planning (RPP) using multi shunt FACTS device based static VAR compensator (SVC) installed at specified buses to make fine corrections to the voltage deviation, voltage phase profiles and reactive power violation. The migration operation inspired from biogeography-based optimization (BBO) algorithm is newly introduced in the proposed approach, thereby effectively exploring and exploiting promising regions in a space search by creating dynamically new efficient partitions. This new mechanism based migration between individuals from different subsystems makes the initial partitions to react more by changing experiences. To validate the robustness of the proposed approach, the proposed algorithm is tested on the Algerian 59-bus electrical network and on a large system, 40 generating units considering valve-point loading effect. Comparison of the results with recent global optimization methods show the superiority of the proposed IDE approach and confirm its potential for solving practical optimal power flow in terms of solution quality and convergence characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. El-Keib A A, Ma H, Hart J L. Economic dispatch in view of the clean air act of 1990. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1994, 9(2): 972–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Talaq J H, El-Hawary F, El-Hawary M E. A summary of environmental and economic dispatch algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1994, 9(3): 1508–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Güvenç U. Snmez Y, Duman S, Yrükeren N. Combined economic and emission dispatch solution using gravitational search algorithm. Scientia Iranica, 2012, 19(6): 1754–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahdad B, Srairi K. A study on multi-objective optimal power flow under contingency using differential evolution. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 2013, 8(1): 53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sttot B, Marinho J L. Linear programming for power system network security applications. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1979, PAS-98(3): 837–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alsac O, Stott B. Optimal load flow with steady state security. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1974, PAS-93(3): 745–751

    Google Scholar 

  7. Momoh J A, Zhu J Z. Improved interior point method for OPF problems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(3): 1114–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zehar K, Sayah S. Optimal power flow with environmental constraint using a fast successive linear programming algorithm: application to the algerian power system. Journal of Energy and Management, 2008, 49(11): 3362–3366

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pezzinia P, Gomis-Bellmunt O, Sudrià-Andreua A. Optimization techniques to improve energy efficiency in power systems. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(4): 2029–2041

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frank S, Steponavice I, Rebennak S. Optimal power flow: a bibliographic survey I, formulations and deterministic methods. International Journal of Energy Systems, 2012, 3(3): 221–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J C, Lin W M, Liao G C, Tsao T P. Quantum genetic algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects and including wind power system. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2011, 33(2): 189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hemamalini S, Simon S P. Dynamic economic dispatch using artificial immune system for units with valve-point effect. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2011, 33(4): 868–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Panigrahi B K, Pandi V R, Das S. Adaptive particle swarm optimization approach for static and dynamic economic load dispatch. Energy Conversion and Management, 2008, 49(6): 1407–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuan X, Su A, Yuan Y, Nie H, Wang L. An improved PSO for dynamic load dispatch of generators with valve-point effects. Energy, 2009, 34(1): 67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Y, Zhou J, Qin H, Lu Y. Improved chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch problem with valve-point effects. Energy Conversion and Management, 2010, 51(12): 2893–2900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar R, Sharma D, Sadu A. A hybrid multi-agent based particle swarm optimization algorithm for economic power dispatch. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2011, 33(1): 115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Selvakumar A I. Enhanced cross-entropy method for dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2011, 33(3): 783–790

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Duman S, Guvenc U, Sonmez Y, Yorukeren N. Optimal power flow using gravitational search algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 2012, 59: 86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hingorani N G, Gyugyi L. Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible A Transmission Systems. Wiley-IEEE Press, 1999

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Aghaei J, Gitizadeh M, Kaji M. Placement and operation strategy of FACTS devices using optimal continuous power flow. Scientia Iranica, 2012, 19(6): 1683–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frank S, Steponavice I, Rebennak S. Optimal power flow: a bibliographic survey II, non-deterministic and hybrid methods. Energy System, 2012, 3(3): 259–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Capitanescu F, Ramos J L M, Panciatici P, Kirschend D, Marcolini A M, Platbrood L, Wehenkel L. State-of-the-art, challenges, and future trends in security constrained optimal power flow. Electric Power Systems Research, 2011, 81(8): 1731–1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution, a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Tech Rep TR-95-012. International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, USA, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  24. Coelho L S, Souza R C T, Mariani V C. Improved differential evolution approach based on cultural algorithm and diversity measure applied to solve economic load dispatch problems. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2009, 79(10): 3136–3147

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Mahdad B, Srairi K. Differential evolution based dynamic decomposed strategy for solution of large practical economic dispatch. In: 10th EEEIC International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering. Rome, Italy, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lu Y, Zhou J, Qin H, Li Y, Zhang Y. An adaptive hybrid differential evolution Algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch with valvepoint effects. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(7): 4842–4849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Simon D. Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2008, 12(6): 702–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bhattacharya A, Chattopadhyay P K. Hybrid differential evolution with Biogeaography-based optimization for solution of economic load dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2010, 25(4): 1955–1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roy P K, Ghoshal S P, Thakur S S. Biogeography based optimization for multi-constraint optimal power flow with emission and non-smooth cost function. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(12): 8221–8228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Feurt-Esquivel C R, Acha E, Tan S G, Rico J J. Efficient object oriented power systems software for the analysis of large-scale networks containing FACTS controlled branches. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1998, 13(2): 464–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mahdad B, Bouktir T, Srairi K. OPF with environmental constraints with SVC controller using decomposed parallel GA: application to the Algerian network. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 2009, 4(1): 55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahdad B, Bouktir T, Srairi K. Fuzzy controlled genetic algorithm for environmental/economic dispatch with shunt FACTS devices. In: Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition. Chicago, USA, 2008, 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  33. Meng K, Wang H G, Dong Z, Wong K P. Quantum-inspired particle swarm optimization for valve-point economic load dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2010, 25(1): 215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Abido M A. Environmental/economic power dispatch using multiobjective evoulutionary algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2002, 18(4): 1529–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Belkacem Mahdad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahdad, B., Srairi, K. & Bouktir, T. Interactive DE for solving combined security environmental economic dispatch considering FACTS technology. Front. Energy 7, 429–447 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-013-0270-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-013-0270-x

Keywords

Navigation