Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The frontier evolution and emerging trends of hydrological connectivity in river systems: a scientometric review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the intensification of climate change and human activities, the watershed ecosystem is seriously fragmented, which leads to the obstruction of hydrological connectivity, and further causes the degradation of the ecosystem. As the value of wetlands continues to be exploited, hydrological connectivity becomes increasingly significant. In this paper, the characteristics and development of hydrological connectivity research from 1998 to 2018 were analyzed through the scientometric analysis based on Web of Science database. CiteSpace, an analytical software for scientific measurement, is used to visualize the results of the retrieval. The analysis results of co-occurrence, co-operative and co-cited network indicate that the hydrological connectivity is a multidisciplinary field which involves the Environment Science and Ecology, Water Resources, Environmental Sciences, Geology and Geosciences. According to Keyword cooccurrence analysis, ecosystem, floodplain, dynamics, climate change and management are the main research hotspots in each period. In addition, the co-cited analysis of references shows that “amphibians” is the largest cluster of hydrological connectivity, and the “channel network” is the most important research topic. It is worth noting that the “GIWS” (Geographically Isolated Wetlands) is the latest research topic and may be a major research direction in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Aarts B G W, Van Den Brinks F W B, Nienhuis P H (2004). Habitat loss as the main cause of the slow recovery of fish faunas of regulated large rivers in Europe: the transversal floodplain gradient. River Res Appl, 20(1): 3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali G, Roy A G (2009). Revisiting hydrologic sampling strategies for an accurate assessment of hydrologic connectivity in humid temperate systems. Geogr Compass, 3(1): 350–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altermatt F, Seymour M, Martinez N (2013). River network properties shape α-diversity and community similarity patterns of aquatic insect communities across major drainage basins. J Biogeogr, 40(12): 2249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken L J, Wainwright J, Ali G A, Tetzlaff D, Smith M W, Reaney S M, Roy A G (2013). Concepts of hydrological connectivity: research approaches, pathways and future agendas. Earth Sci Rev, 119: 17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken L, Croke J (2007). The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff-dominated geomorphic systems. Hydrol Processes, 21(13): 1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara F, Altermatt F, Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Rinaldo A (2012). Dendritic connectivity controls biodiversity patterns in experimental metacommunities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109(15): 5761–5766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick M (2008). Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Freshw Biol, 53(9): 1914

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapins III F S, Zavaleta E S, Eviner V T, Naylor R L, Reynolds H L, Hooper D U, Lavorel S, Sala O E, Hobbie S E, Mack M C, Díaz S, Sandra D (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405(6783): 234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101 (Suppl 1): 5303–5310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 57(3): 359–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chovanec A, Waringer J (2001). Ecological integrity of river-floodplain systems-assessment by dragonfly surveys (Insecta: Odonata). Regul Rivers Res Manage, 17(4–5): 493–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa M, Aurélie B, Jeffrey C (2002). Effects of large-scale changes in land cover and climate variability in the discharge of the Tocantins River. In: AGU Fall Meeting

  • Creed I, Band L (1998). Exploring functional similarity in the export of nitrate-n from forested catchments: a mechanistic modeling approach. Water Resour Res, 34(11): 3079–3093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croke J, Mockler S, Fogarty P, Takken I (2005). Sediment concentration changes in runoff pathways from a forest road network and the resultant spatial pattern of catchment connectivity. Geomorphology, 68(3–4): 257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui X, Guo X, Wang Y, Wang X, Zhu W, Shi J, Lin C, Gao X (2019). Application of remote sensing to water environmental processes under a changing climate. J Hydrol (Amst), 574: 892–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore A, Kaushal S S (2008). Disappearing headwaters: patterns of stream burial due to urbanization. Front Ecol Environ, 6(6): 308–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Lillo F, Úbeda-García M, Marco-Lajara B, Bartolomé (2016). Organizational ambidexterity: exploring the knowledge base. Scientometrics, 107(3): 1021–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumiero B, Mant J, Hein T, Elso J, Boz B (2013). Linking the restoration of rivers and riparian zones/wetlands in Europe: Sharing knowledge through case studies. Ecol Eng, 56: 36–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooke J (2003). Coarse sediment connectivity in river channel systems: A conceptual framework and methodology. Geomorphology, 56(1–2): 79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G, Tignor M, Allen S, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley P (2013). IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman L, Rousseeuw P (1990). Partitioning boids (Program PAM). In: Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. 344: 68–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaus A, Michalski S, Hänfling B, Karthe D, Borchardt D, Durka W (2019). Fish conservation in the land of steppe and sky: Evolutionarily significant units of threatened salmonid species in Mongolia mirror major river basins. Ecol Evol, 9(6): 3416–3433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudby C, Carrera J (2005). On the relationship between indicators of geostatistical, flow and transport connectivity. Adv Water Resour, 28 (4): 405–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane S, Brookes C J, Kirkby M, Holden J (2004). A network-indexbased version of TOPMODEL for use with high-resolution digital topographic data. Hydrol Processes, 18(1): 191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang C, Luo A, Zhong Z (2018). Knowledge mapping of medication literacy study: a visualized analysis using CiteSpace. SAGE Open Med, 6: 2050312118800199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Engel B A, Wang Y, Zhang G, Zhang Z, Zhang M (2020). Multiscale analysis of hydrological connectivity and plant response in the Yellow River Delta. Sci Total Environ, 702: 134889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe W (2006). The trouble with rivers. Bioscience, 56(3): 260–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhi Y, Roberts J T, Betts R A, Killeen T J, Li W, Nobre C A (2008). Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science, 319(5860): 169–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matson P A, Parton W J, Power A G, Swift M J (1997). Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 277(5325): 504–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng B, Liu J L, Bao K, Sun B (2020). Methodologies and management framework for restoration of wetland hydrologic connectivity: a synthesis. Integr Environ Assess Manag, 16(4): 438–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obolewski K (2011). Macrozoobenthos Patterns along Environmental Gradients and Hydrological Connectivity of Oxbow Lakes. Ecol Eng, 37(5): 796–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo C J, Sivapalan M, Oldham C (2006). Hydrological connectivity of upland-riparian zones in agricultural catchments: implications for runoff generation and nitrate transport. J Hydrol (Amst), 331(3–4): 643–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang W, Wang Y, Lin C, He M, Hao F, Liu H, Zhu W (2018). Heavy metal loss from agricultural watershed to aquatic system: a scientometrics review. Sci Total Environ, 637–638: 208–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipsen I C, Kirk E H, Bogan M T, Mims M C, Olden J D, Lytle D A (2015). Dispersal ability and habitat requirements determine landscape-level genetic patterns in desert aquatic insects. Mol Ecol, 24(1): 54–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle C (2001). Hydrologic connectivity and the management of biological reserves: a global perspective. Ecol Appl, 11(4): 981–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle C (2003). What is hydrologic connectivity and Why is it ecologically important? Hydrol Processes, 17(13): 2685–2689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read E K, Patil V P, Oliver S K, Hetherington A L, Brentrup J A, Zwart J A, Winters K M, Corman J R, Nodine E R, Woolway R I, Dugan H A, Jaimes A, Santoso A B, Hong G S, Winslow L A, Hanson P C, Weathers K C (2015). The importance of lake-specific characteristics for water quality across the continental United States. Ecol Appl, 25 (4): 943–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour M, Fronhofer E A, Altermatt F (2015). Dendritic network structure and dispersal affect temporal dynamics of diversity and species persistence. Oikos, 124(7): 908–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao X, Fang Y, Jawitz J W, Yan J, Cui B (2019). River network connectivity and fish diversity. Sci Total Environ, 689: 21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz M, Shaman J, McNamara J, Engel V, Shanley J, Kling G (2003). An approach to understanding hydrologic connectivity on the hillslope and the implications for nutrient transport. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 17(4): 17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Zhang T (2018). Robust fractional programming approach for improving agricultural water-use efficy under uncertainty. J Hydrol, 567: 1110–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetzlaff D, Soulsby C, Bacon P J, Youngson A F, Gibbins C, Malcolm I A (2007). Connectivity between landscapes and riverscapes—a unifying theme in integrating hydrology and ecology in catchment science? Hydrol Processes, 21(10): 1385–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannote R L, Minshall G W, Cummins K, Sedell J R, Cushing C E (1980). The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 37(1): 130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidon P, Hill A R (2004). Landscape controls on nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. Water Resour Res, 40(3): 40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J (1989). The four dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. J N Am Benthol Soc, 8(1): 2–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie P (2015). Study of international anticancer research trends via co-word and document co-citation visualization analysis. Scientometrics, 105(1): 611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Sui J, Liu T, Wu W, Xu S, Yin L, Pu Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Shen B, Liang G (2018). Trends on PM2.5 research, 1997–2016: a bibliometric study. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 25(13): 12284–12298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu D J (2015). A scientometrics review on aggregation operator research. Scientometrics, 105(1): 115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu D J, Xu Z S, Pedrycz W, Wang W R (2017). Information sciences 1968–2016: a retrospective analysis with text mining and bibliometric. Inf Sci, 418–419: 619–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Gao M, Yue S, Zheng T, Gao Z, Ma X, Wang Q (2018). Global tr ends and future prospects of food waste research: a bibliometric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 25(25): 24600–24610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Tan Q, Cai Y, Zhang T, Song G (2019). Mathematical analyses of ecological and economic tradeoffs in irrigated agriculture based on inexact optimization principles and hierarchical crop projections. J Clean Prod, 235: 69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2016YFC0502209), the Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (GML2019ZD0403), the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. JQ18028) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51879007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanpeng Cai.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, B., Yang, Z., Cai, Y. et al. The frontier evolution and emerging trends of hydrological connectivity in river systems: a scientometric review. Front. Earth Sci. 15, 81–93 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-020-0852-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-020-0852-y

Keywords