The pore structure and fractal characteristics of shales with low thermal maturity from the Yuqia Coalfield, northern Qaidam Basin, northwestern China
- 39 Downloads
The continental shales from the Middle Jurassic Shimengou Formation of the northern Qaidam Basin, northwestern China, have been investigated in recent years because of their shale gas potential. In this study, a total of twenty-two shale samples were collected from the YQ-1 borehole in the Yuqia Coalfield, northern Qaidam Basin. The total organic carbon (TOC) contents, pore structure parameters, and fractal characteristics of the samples were investigated using TOC analysis, low-temperature nitrogen adsorption experiments, and fractal analysis. The results show that the average pore size of the Shimengou shales varied from 8.149 nm to 20.635 nm with a mean value of 10.74 nm, which is considered mesopore-sized. The pores of the shales are mainly inkbottle- and slit-shaped. The sedimentary environment plays an essential role in controlling the TOC contents of the low maturity shales, with the TOC values of shales from deep to semi-deep lake facies (mean: 5.23%) being notably higher than those of the shore-shallow lake facies (mean: 0.65%). The fractal dimensions range from 2.4639 to 2.6857 with a mean of 2.6122, higher than those of marine shales, which indicates that the pore surface was rougher and the pore structure more complex in these continental shales. The fractal dimensions increase with increasing total pore volume and total specific surface area, and with decreasing average pore size. With increasing TOC contents in shales, the fractal dimensions increase first and then decrease, with the highest value occurring at 2% of TOC content, which is in accordance with the trends between the TOC and both total specific surface area and total pore volume. The pore structure complexity and pore surface roughness of these low-maturity shales would be controlled by the combined effects of both sedimentary environments and the TOC contents.
Keywordsshale gas pore structure fractal dimension Yuqia Coalfield Jurassic northern Qaidam Basin
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This research was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX05041004-003) and the China Geological Survey Scientific Research Project (12120114019501 and 1212011220794). The authors are grateful for the valuable comments from two anonymous reviewers.
- Cao T T, Song Z G, Luo H Y, Liu G X (2015). The differences of microscopic pore structure characteristics of coal, oil shale and shales and their storage mechanisms. Natural Gas Geoscience, 26(11): 2208–2218 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Chalmers G R, Bustin R M, Power I M (2012). Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig units. AAPG Bull, 96(6): 1099–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gregg S J, Sing K S W (1982). Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity (2nd ed). London: Academic Press, 42–55Google Scholar
- Li A, Ding W L, He J H, Dai P, Yin S, Xie F (2016). Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic-rich shale reservoirs: a case study of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Malong block of eastern Yunnan Province, South China. Mar Pet Geol, 70: 46–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu S X, Zhong J H, Ma Y S, Yin C M, Liu C L, Li Z X, Liu X, Li Y, Liu X G (2015a). Study of microscopic pore structure and adsorption isothermal of carboniferous shale, Eastern Qaidam Basin. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 39(1): 33–42 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Luo C, Liu S G, Sun W, Ran B, Wang S Y, Yang D, Bai Z Q, Ye Y C, Zhang X, Deng B (2014). Pore structure characterization of black shale in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in western Hubei and eastern Chongqing area. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 38(2): 8–17 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Micromeritics Instrument Corporation (2012). TriStarII 3020 Operator’s Manual. Georgia: C15–C20Google Scholar
- Shao L Y, Li M, Li Y H, Zhang Y P, Lu J, Zhang W L, Tian Z, Wen H J (2014). Geological characteristics and controlling factors of shale gas in the Jurassic of the northern Qaidam Basin. Earth Sci Front, 21(4): 311–322 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Shao L Y, Liu L, Wen H J, Li Y H, Zhang W L, Li M (2016). Characteristics and influencing factors of nanopores in the Midddle Jurassic Shimengou shale in Well YQ-1 of the northern Qaidam Basin. Earth Sci Front, 23(1): 164–173 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Tang X L, Jiang Z X, Li Z, Gao Z Y, Bai Y Q, Zhao S, Feng J (2015). The effect of the variation in material composition on the heterogeneous pore structure of high-maturity shale of the Silurian Longmaxi formation in the southeastern Sichuan Basin, China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 23: 464–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wu J G, Liu D M, Yao Y B (2014). Characteristics and controlling factors of nanopores in shales in Weibei, Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 35(4): 542–550 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Xiao Z H, Wang C H, Yang F R, Feng T, Wang Q R, Huang Y R, Chen X Y, Deng Y (2013). Reservoir conditions of shale gas in Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation, northwestern Hunan. Acta Geol Sin, 87(10): 1612–1623 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Xie H P (1996). A Study for Fractal and Rock Mechanics. Beijing: Science Publishing House, 93–95 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhang D W, Li Y X, Zhang J C, Qiao D W, Jiang WL, Zhang J F (2012). The Evaluation of Shale Gas Resources and Potential Investigation in China. Beijing: Geology Publishing House, 70–78 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhang J C, Jin Z J, Yuan M S (2004). Reservoir mechanism of shale gas and its distribution. Natural Gas Industry, 24(7): 15–18 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhu X M (2008). Sedimentary Petrology (4th ed). Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 208–286 (in Chinese)Google Scholar