Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agricultural land use intensity and its determinants: A case study in Taibus Banner, Inner Mongolia, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on rural household survey data from Taibus Banner, in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China, this study separately categorizes agricultural land use intensity into labor intensity, capital intensity, the intensity of labor-saving inputs, and the intensity of yield-increasing inputs, and then analyzes their determinants at the household level. The findings reveal that within the study area: (1) labor intensity is higher and capital intensity is lower than in the major grain-producing and economically developed areas of eastern and central China; (2) the most widely planted crops are those with the lowest labor intensity (oats) and capital intensity (benne); (3) there are marked differences in agricultural land use intensity among households; a major factor affecting land use decision-making is the reduced need for labor intensity for those households with high opportunity costs, such as those with income earned from non-farming activities which alleviates financial constraints and allows for increased capital intensity. As a result, these households invest more in labor-saving inputs; (4) households with a larger number of workers will allocate adequate time to manage their land and thus they will not necessarily invest more in labor-saving inputs. Those households with more land to manage tend to adopt an extensive cultivation strategy. Total income has a positive impact on capital intensity and a negative impact on labor intensity. Households that derive a higher proportion of their total income through farming are more reliant upon agriculture, which necessitates significant labor and yield-increasing inputs. Finally, the authors contend that policy makers should clearly recognize the impacts of non-farming employment on agricultural land use intensity. In order to ensure long-term food security and sustainable agricultural development in China, income streams from both farming and non-farming employment should be balanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alwang J, Siegel B (1999). Labor shortages on small landholdings in Malawi: Implications for policy reforms. World Dev, 27(8): 1461–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An Y J, Men M X, Huo X L, Xu H (2009). The Characteristics of the agricultural land use intensity in Hebei based on the production cost. Progress in Geography, 28(4): 611–616 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlowe R (1985). Land Resource Economics: The Economics of Real Estate (4th ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 94–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyene A D (2008). Determinants of off-farm participation decision of farm households in Ethiopia. Agrekon, 47(1): 140–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicak H A, Jenkins G P, Kuo C Y, Mphahlele M B (2004). An operational guide to the estimation of the economic opportunity cost of labour in South Africa. S Afr J Econ, 72(5): 1057–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosig S, Glauben T, Herzfeld T, Wang X B (2009). Persistence of fulland part-time farming in Southern China. China Econ Rev, 20(2): 360–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraveli H (2000). A comparative analysis on intensification and extensification in Mediterranean agriculture: Dilemmas for LFAs policy. J Rural Stud, 16(2): 231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y Q (2010). Agricultural land use responses to the rising labor opportunity cost in Sui County, China. Chinese J Pop Resour Environ, 8(4): 10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y Q, Li X B, Tian Y J, Tan M H (2009). Structural change of agricultural land use intensity and its regional disparity in China. J Geogr Sci, 19(5): 545–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y Q, Li X B, Wang J (2011). Changes and effecting factors of grain production in China. Chin Geogr Sci, 21(6): 676–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Cornejo J, Mishra A, Nehring R, Hendricks C, Southern M, Gregory A (2007). Off-farm income, technology adoption, and farm economic performance (No. 7234). United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellrich M, Zimmermann N E (2007). Investigating the regional-scale pattern of agricultural land abandonment in the Swiss mountains: A spatial statistical modelling approach. Landsc Urban Plan, 79(1): 65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray C L (2009). Rural out-migration and smallholder agriculture in the southern Ecuadorian Andes. Popul Environ, 30(4–5): 193–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groom B, Grosjean P, Kontoleon A, Swanson T, Zhang S (2010). Relaxing rural constraints: a ‘win-win’ policy for poverty and environment in China? Oxf Econ Pap, 62(1): 132–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J K, Wu Y H, Rozelle S (2009). Moving off the farm and intensifying agricultural production in Shandong: A case study of rural labor market linkages in China. Agric Econ, 40(2): 203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman W E (1996). Farm labor: key conceptual and measurement issues on the route to better farm cost and return estimates. Iowa State University, Department of Economics. Avalable at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/18254/1/isu280.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishemo A, Semple H, Thomas-Hope E (2006). Population mobility and the survival of small farming in the Rio Grande Valley, Jamaica. Geogr J, 172(4): 318–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilic T, Carletto C, Miluka J, Savastano S (2009). Rural nonfarm income and its impact on agriculture: evidence from Albania. Agric Econ, 40(2): 139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Zhao L G (2009a). Agricultural labor force aging phenomenon and the effect on agricultural production: Evidence from Liaoning Province. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 10: 12–18 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Zhao L G (2009b). Agricultural labor force feminine phenomenon and the effect on agricultural production: Evidence from Liaoning Province. Chinese Rural Economy, 5: 61–69 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Cai Y, Zhu D, Zhang A (2006). Agricultural land loss in China’s urbanization process. Ecol Econ, 2: 32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhu H, Tan M, Xin L (2008). Measurement of land use intensity. Progress in Geography, 27(6): 12–17 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CW, Li X B (2006). Regional disparity in the changes of agricultural land use intensity in China during 1980–2002. J Geogr Sci, 16(3): 286–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y S, Wang J Y, Guo L Y (2009). The spatial-temporal changes of grain production and arable land in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 42(12): 4269–4274 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Long H, Zou J (2010). Grain production driven by variations in farmland use in China: An analysis of security patterns. J Resour Ecol, 1(1): 60–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Low A (1986). Agricultural Development in Southern Africa: Farm-Household Economics and the Food Crisis. London: James Currey

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran-Taylor M J, Taylor M J (2010). Land and leña: linking transnational migration, natural resources, and the environment in Guatemala. Pop Environ, 32(2–3): 198–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morera M C, Gladwin C H (2006). Does off-farm work discourage soil conservation? Incentives and disincentives throughout two Honduran hillside communities. Hum Ecol, 34(3): 355–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Pandya K, Symons J (1997). Farm size and the intensity of land use in Gujarat. Oxf Econ Pap, 49(2): 307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oseni G, Winters P (2009). Rural nonfarm activities and agricultural crop production in Nigeria. Agric Econ, 40(2): 189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paudel K P, Wang Y Q (2002). Part time farming, farm productivity, and farm income: Evidence from the southeast US. In American Agricultural Economics Associations Annual Meeting, California. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/19594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phimister E, Roberts D (2006). The effect of off-farm work on the intensity of agricultural production. Environ Resour Econ, 34(4): 493–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel T K (2006). After the labor migrants leave: The search for sustainable development in a sending region of the Ecuadorian Amazon. World Dev, 34(5): 838–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel T K, Coomes O T, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu J C, Lambin E (2005). Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change, 15(1): 23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strijker D (2005). Marginal lands in Europe: Causes of decline. Basic Appl Ecol, 6(2): 99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K, Otsuka K (2009). The increasing importance of nonfarm income and the changing use of labor and capital in rice farming: The case of Central Luzon, 1979–2003. Agric Econ, 40(2): 231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J, Rozelle S, deBrauw A (2003). Migration and incomes in source communities: A new economics of migration perspective from China. Econ Dev Cult Change, 52(1): 75–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Li X, Ma G, Hao H (2011). Impacts of the rising opportunity cost of farm labor on agricultural land use structure: Theory and empirical evidences. Chinese J Pop Resour Environ, 9(1): 85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin L, Li X, Zhu H, Tan M (2009). China’s potential of grain production due to changes in agricultural land utilization in recent years. Chin Geogr Sci, 19(2): 97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan H, Liu J, Huang H Q, Tao B, Cao M (2009). Assessing the consequence of land use change on agricultural productivity in China. Global Planet Change, 67(1–2): 13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan J Z, Zhuo R G, Xie D L, Zhang Y L (2010). Land use characters of farmers of different livelihood strategies: Cases in Three Gorges Reservoir Area. J Geogr Sci, 65(11): 1401–1410 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin P H, Fang X Q, Yun Y R (2009). Regional differences of vulnerability of food security in China. J Geogr Sci, 19(5): 532–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai R X, Liu Y S (2008). Changes in regional pattern for grain production in China since the 90’S of 20 century. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 32(6): 49–54 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G P, Liu J Y, Zhang Z X (2003). Spatial-temporal changes of cropland in China for the past 10 years based on remote sensing. J Geogr Sci, 58(3): 323–332 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhang F, An P, Zhang W, Yan L (2008b). Comparative study of cultivated land use intensive degree and its change law at different economic levels. Transactions of the CSAE, 24(1): 108–112 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhang Y, Yan J, Wu Y (2008a). Livelihood diversification and cropland use pattern in agro-pastoral mountainous region of eastern Tibetan Plateau. J Geogr Sci, 18(4): 499–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L H, Zhao X G, Zhao D W, Yang F, Zhang L (2009). Analysis of grain production changes and food security problem in Inner Mongolia. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 30(6): 673–677 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H Y, Li X B, Xin L J (2007). Intensity change in cultivated land use in China and its policy implications. Journal of Natural Resources, 22(6): 907–915 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China

    Haiguang Hao & Huiyuan Zhang

  2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China

    Haiguang Hao, Xiubin Li & Minghong Tan

  3. Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing, 100037, China

    Jiping Zhang

Authors
  1. Haiguang Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiubin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Minghong Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiping Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huiyuan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiguang Hao.

Additional information

Dr. Haiguang Hao obtained his Ph.D. in Physical Geography Sciences from the Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR), Chinese Academy of Sciences. He is currently a post-doctoral in the IGSNRR. His main fields of scientific interest include land use change and its effects on the environment.

Dr. Xiubin Li obtained his Ph.D. in the Department of Geography from the University of Hong Kong, M.S. degree from the Institute of Geographic Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Bachelor’s degree in Geography from Beijing Normal University. He is currently a professor at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. His research fields include land use and land cover change.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hao, H., Li, X., Tan, M. et al. Agricultural land use intensity and its determinants: A case study in Taibus Banner, Inner Mongolia, China. Front. Earth Sci. 9, 308–318 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0471-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0471-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation