Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial risk assessment for critical network infrastructure using sensitivity analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presented spatial risk assessment method allows for managing critical network infrastructure in urban areas under abnormal and future conditions caused e.g., by terrorist attacks, infrastructure deterioration or climate change. For the spatial risk assessment, vulnerability maps for critical network infrastructure are merged with hazard maps for an interfering process. Vulnerability maps are generated using a spatial sensitivity analysis of network transport models to evaluate performance decrease under investigated thread scenarios. Thereby parameters are varied according to the specific impact of a particular threat scenario. Hazard maps are generated with a geographical information system using raster data of the same threat scenario derived from structured interviews and cluster analysis of events in the past. The application of the spatial risk assessment is exemplified by means of a case study for a water supply system, but the principal concept is applicable likewise to other critical network infrastructure. The aim of the approach is to help decision makers in choosing zones for preventive measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brashear J, Stenzler J (2007). Water and wastewater specific RAMCAP guidance. In: AWWA/WEF Joint Management Conference, Portland, OR, USA, Feb. 25–28

  • Chen Y, Xu Y P, Yin Y X (2009). Impacts of land use change scenarios on storm-runoff generation in Xitiaoxi Basin, China. Quat Int, 208(1–2): 121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezell B C (2007). Infrastructure vulnerability assessment model (IVAM). Risk Anal, 27(3): 571–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick P H (2006). Water and terrorism. Water Policy, 8(6): 481–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber U, Bartelt P (2007). Snow avalanche hazard modelling of large areas using shallow water numerical methods and GIS. Environ Model Softw, 22(10): 1472–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram N, Srinivasan K (2008). Performance-based optimal design and rehabilitation of water distribution networks using life cycle costing. Water Resour Res, 44(1): 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Liu J, Cui Q, An X, Wu C (2011). Land use/land cover change and driving force analysis in Xishuangbanna Region in 1986–2008. Frontiers of Earth Science, 5(3): 288–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanal N, Buchberger S G, McKenna S A (2006). Distribution system contamination events: Exposure, influence, and sensitivity. J Water Resour Plan Manage, 132(4): 283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J W, Wang Z M, Xie F R (2010). Seismic hazard and risk assessments for Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Area, China. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 53(2): 318–325 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri Daneshvar M, Bagherzadeh A (2011). Landslide hazard zonation assessment using GIS analysis at Golmakan Watershed, northeast of Iran. Frontiers of Earth Science, 5(1): 70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark O, Wennberg C, van Kalken T, Rabbi F, Albinsson B (1998). Risk analyses for sewer systems based on numerical modelling and GIS. Saf Sci, 30(1–2): 99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz R, Bloschl G, Humer G (2008). National flood discharge mapping in Austria. Nat Hazards, 46(1): 53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möderl M, Fetz T, Rauch W (2007). Stochastic approach for performance evaluation regarding water distribution systems. Water Sci Technol, 56(9): 29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möderl M, Kleidorfer M, Sitzenfrei R, Rauch W (2009). Identifying weak points of urban drainage systems by means of VulNetUD. Water Sci Technol, 60(10): 2507–2513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möderl M, Rauch W (2011). Chapter 7-Spatial Distributed Risk Assessment for Urban Water Infrastructure. Clark R M, Hakim S, Ostfell A, eds. Handbook of water and Wastewater Systems Protection. Berlin: Springer, ISBN 9781461401889

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson K A, Buchberger S G, Clark R M (2005). Simulating exposures to deliberate intrusions into water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manage, 131(3): 228–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu G S, Huang J F, Ma Z J, Li Y G, Ning B K (2007). The New Developments of Emergency Management of China and the Cases of Operation of CISAR in Recent Years. Paris: Atlantis Press. ISBN 9789078677031

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman L A (2000). EPANET 2 User Manual. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, USEPA, Cincinnati, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman L A (2004). StormWater Management Model—User’s Manual Version 5.0. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, USEPA, Cincinnati, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • UN DHA (1992). Internationally Agreed Glossary of Basic Terms Related to Disaster Management. UN DHA (United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanham D, Fleischhacker E, Rauch W (2008). Technical note: Seasonality in alpine water resources management—a regional assessment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 12(1): 91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vreeburg J H G, van den, Hoven T J J, Hoogsteen K J (1994). A quantitative method to determine reliability of water supply systems. Water Supply, 12(1–2): ss7.9–7.13

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Zhang W, Chen Y D, Jiang T (2011a). Flood, drought and typhoon disasters during the last half-century in the Guangdong Province, China. Nat Hazards, 57(2): 267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Li H Z, Chen J P, Zhang C, Xu L M, Sang W F (2011b). Comprehensive hazard assessment and protection of debris flows along Jinsha River close to the Wudongde Dam site in China. Natural Hazards, 58(1): 459–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Möderl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Möderl, M., Rauch, W. Spatial risk assessment for critical network infrastructure using sensitivity analysis. Front. Earth Sci. 5, 414–420 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-011-0202-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-011-0202-1

Keywords

Navigation