Advertisement

Frontiers of Materials Science

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 184–197 | Cite as

In vitro corrosion of magnesium alloy AZ31 — a synergetic influence of glucose and Tris

  • Ling-Yu Li
  • Bin Liu
  • Rong-Chang Zeng
  • Shuo-Qi Li
  • Fen Zhang
  • Yu-Hong Zou
  • Hongwei George Jiang
  • Xiao-Bo Chen
  • Shao-Kang Guan
  • Qing-Yun Liu
Research Article

Abstract

Biodegradable Mg alloys have generated great interest for biomedical applications. Accurate predictions of in vivo degradation of Mg alloys through cost-effective in vivo evaluations require the latter to be conducted in an environment close to that of physiological scenarios. However, the roles of glucose and buffering agents in regulating the in vivo degradation performance of Mg alloys has not been elucidated. Herein, degradation behavior of AZ31 alloy is investigated by hydrogen evolution measurements, pH monitoring and electrochemical tests. Results indicate that glucose plays a content-dependent role in degradation of AZ31 alloy in buffer-free saline solution. The presence of a low concentration of glucose, i.e. 1.0 g/L, decreases the corrosion rate of Mg alloy AZ31, whereas the presence of 2.0 and 3.0 g/L glucose accelerates the corrosion rate during long term immersion in saline solution. In terms of Tris-buffered saline solution, the addition of glucose increases pH value and promotes pitting corrosion or general corrosion of AZ31 alloy. This study provides a novel perspective to understand the bio-corrosion of Mg alloys in buffering agents and glucose containing solutions.

Keywords

magnesium alloys corrosion glucose Tris biomaterials 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51571134 and 51601108), the SDUST Research Fund (2014TDJH104) and the Science and Technology Innovation Fund of SDUST for graduate students (SDKDYC180371).

References

  1. [1]
    Zheng Y F, Gu X N, Witte F. Biodegradable metals. Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports, 2014, 77(2): 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Zeng R C, Qi WC, Cui H Z, et al. In vitro corrosion of as-extruded Mg–Ca alloys — The influence of Ca concentration. Corrosion Science, 2015, 96: 23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Witte F, Kaese V, Haferkamp H, et al. In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(17): 3557–3563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Ascencio M, Pekguleryuz M, Omanovic S. An investigation of the corrosion mechanisms of WE43Mg alloy in a modified simulated body fluid solution: The effect of electrolyte renewal. Corrosion Science, 2015, 91(5): 297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Li Y, Cai S, Xu G, et al. Synthesis and characterization of a phytic acid/mesoporous 45S5 bioglass composite coating on a magnesium alloy and degradation behavior. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(33): 25708–25716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Zeng R C, Cui L Y, Jiang K, et al. In vitro corrosion and cytocompatibility of a microarc oxidation coating and poly(L-lactic acid) composite coating on Mg–1Li–1Ca alloy for orthopedic implants. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(15): 10014–10028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Gu X N, Zhou WR, Zheng Y F, et al. Corrosion fatigue behaviors of two biomedical Mg alloys–AZ91D and WE43–in simulated body fluid. Acta Biomaterialia, 2010, 6(12): 4605–4613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Jin W, Wu G, Feng H, et al. Improvement of corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of rare-earth WE43 magnesium alloy by neodymium self-ion implantation. Corrosion Science, 2015, 94 (Supplement C): 142–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Liu X, Yang Q, Li Z, et al. A combined coating strategy based on atomic layer deposition for enhancement of corrosion resistance of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 434: 1101–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Walter R, Kannan MB, He Y, et al. Effect of surface roughness on the in vitro degradation behaviour of a biodegradable magnesiumbased alloy. Applied Surface Science, 2013, 279(Supplement C): 343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Cipriano A F, Sallee A, Tayoba M, et al. Cytocompatibility and early inflammatory response of human endothelial cells in direct culture with Mg–Zn–Sr alloys. Acta Biomaterialia, 2017, 48 (Supplement C): 499–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Shi Y, Zhang L, Chen J, et al. In vitro and in vivo degradation of rapamycin-eluting Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy stents in porcine coronary arteries. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2017, 80(Supplement C): 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Chang W H, Qu B, Liao A D, et al. In vitro biocompatibility and antibacterial behavior of anodic coatings fabricated in an organic phosphate containing solution on Mg–1.0Ca alloys. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2016, 289: 75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Wang X J, Xu D K, Wu R Z, et al. What is going on in magnesium alloys? Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2018, 34(2): 245–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Wang L, Shinohara T, Zhang B P. Influence of chloride, sulfateand bicarbonate anions on the corrosion behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2010, 496 (1–2): 500–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Cipriano A F, Sallee A, Guan R G, et al. A comparison study on the degradation and cytocompatibility of Mg–4Zn–xSr alloys in direct culture. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2017, 3 (4): 540–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Xin Y, Hu T, Chu P K. In vitro studies of biomedical magnesium alloys in a simulated physiological environment: a review. Acta Biomaterialia, 2011, 7(4): 1452–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Zhen Z, Zheng Y, Ge Z, et al. Biological effect and molecular mechanism study of biomaterials based on proteomic research. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2017, 33(7): 607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Cui L Y, Sun L, Zeng R C, et al. In vitro degradation and biocompatibility of Mg–Li–Ca alloys — The influence of Li content. Science China Materials, 2018, 61(4): 607–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Wang J L, Mukherjee S, Nisbet D R, et al. In vitro evaluation of biodegradable magnesium alloys containing micro-alloying additions of strontium, with and without zinc. Journal of Materials Chemistry B: Materials for Biology and Medicine, 2015, 3(45): 8874–8883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Hou L, Li Z, Zhao H, et al. Microstructure, mechanical properties, corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of as-extruded biodegradable Mg–3Sn–1Zn–0.5Mn alloy. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2016, 32(9): 874–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Li C Q, Xu D K, Yu S, et al. Effect of icosahedral phase on crystallographic texture and mechanical anisotropy of Mg–4%Li based alloys. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2017, 33(5): 475–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Jia H, Feng X, Yang Y. Microstructure and corrosion resistance of directionally solidified Mg–2 wt.% Zn alloy. Corrosion Science, 2017, 120: 75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Zeng R C, Qi WC, Cui H Z, et al. In vitro corrosion of as-extruded Mg–Ca alloys — The influence of Ca concentration. Corrosion Science, 2015, 96: 23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Jiang H, Li F, Zeng X. Microstructural characteristics and deformation of magnesium alloy AZ31 produced by continuous variable cross-section direct extrusion. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2017, 33(6): 573–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Li C Q, Xu D K, Wang B J, et al. Suppressing effect of heat treatment on the Portevin–Le Chatelier phenomenon of Mg–4% Li–6%Zn–1.2%Y alloy. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2016, 32(12): 1232–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Feng H, Liu S, Du Y, et al. Effect of the second phases on corrosion behavior of the Mg–Al–Zn alloys. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017, 695: 2330–2338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Jia Z, Xiong P, Shi Y, et al. Inhibitor encapsulated, self-healable and cytocompatible chitosan multilayer coating on biodegradable Mg alloy: a pH-responsive design. Journal of Materials Chemistry B: Materials for Biology and Medicine, 2016, 4(14): 2498–2511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Cui L Y, Zeng R C, Zhu X X, et al. Corrosion resistance of biodegradable polymeric layer-by-layer coatings on magnesium alloy AZ31. Frontiers of Materials Science, 2016, 10(2): 134–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Chen J Y, Chen X B, Li J L, et al. Electrosprayed PLGA smart containers for active anti-corrosion coating on magnesium alloy AMlite. Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2014, 2(16): 5738–5743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Wan P, Tan L, Yang K. Surface modification on biodegradable magnesium alloys as orthopedic implant materials to improve the bio-adaptability: A review. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2016, 32(9): 827–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Merino M C, Pardo A, Arrabal R, et al. Influence of chloride ion concentration and temperature on the corrosion of Mg–Al alloys in salt fog. Corrosion Science, 2010, 52(5): 1696–1704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Cui L Y, Gao S D, Li P P, et al. Corrosion resistance of a selfhealing micro-arc oxidation/polymethyltrimethoxysilane composite coating on magnesium alloy AZ31. Corrosion Science, 2017, 118: 84–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Song Y, Shan D, Han E H. Pitting corrosion of a Rare Earth Mg alloy GW93. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2017, 33(9): 954–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Wen C L, Guan S K, Peng L, et al. Characterization and degradation behavior of AZ31 alloy surface modified by bone-like hydroxyapatite for implant applications. Applied Surface Science, 2009, 255(13–14): 6433–6438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Zeng R C, Hu Y, Guan S K, et al. Corrosion of magnesium alloy AZ31: The influence of bicarbonate, sulphate, hydrogen phosphate and dihydrogen phosphate ions in saline solution. Corrosion Science, 2014, 86(10): 171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Walker J, Shadanbaz S, Kirkland N T, et al. Magnesium alloys: Predicting in vivo corrosion with in vitro immersion testing. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2012, 100(4): 1134–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Guo L, Zhang F, Song L, et al. Corrosion resistance of ceria/ polymethyltrimethoxysilane modified magnesium hydroxide coating on AZ31 magnesium alloy. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2017, 328: 121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Sales C H, Pedrosa L F, Lima J G, et al. Influence of magnesium status and magnesium intake on the blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clinical Nutrition, 2011, 30(3): 359–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Hruby A, Meigs J B, O’Donnell C J, et al. Higher magnesium intake reduces risk of impaired glucose and insulin metabolism and progression from prediabetes to diabetes in middle-aged Americans. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 2014, 37 (2): 419–427Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Zeng R C, Li X T, Li S Q, et al. In vitro degradation of pure Mg in response to glucose. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5(1): 13026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Cui L Y, Li X T, Zeng R C, et al. In vitro corrosion of Mg–Ca alloy — The influence of glucose content. Frontiers of Materials Science, 2017, 11(3): 284–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Wang Y, Cui L Y, Zeng R C, et al. In vitro degradation of pure magnesium—the effects of glucose and/or amino acid. Materials, 2017, 10(7): 725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Kannan M B, Khakbaz H, Yamamoto A. Understanding the influence of HEPES buffer concentration on the biodegradation of pure magnesium: An electrochemical study. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2017, 197: 47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Cui L Y, Hu Y, Zeng R C, et al. New insights into the effect of Tris-HCl and Tris on corrosion of magnesium alloy in presence of bicarbonate, sulfate, hydrogen phosphate and dihydrogen phosphate ions. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2017, 33 (9): 971–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Kirkland N T, Waterman J, Birbilis N, et al. Buffer-regulated biocorrosion of pure magnesium. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2012, 23(2): 283–291Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Xin Y, Chu P K. Influence of Tris in simulated body fluid on degradation behavior of pure magnesium. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2010, 124(1): 33–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Zeng R C, Cui L Y, Jiang K, et al. In vitro corrosion and cytocompatibility of a microarc oxidation coating and poly(Llactic acid) composite coating on Mg–1Li–1Ca alloy for orthopedic implants. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(15): 10014–10028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Zhao Y B, Liu H P, Li C Y, et al. Corrosion resistance and adhesion strength of a spin-assisted layer-by-layer assembled coating on AZ31 magnesium alloy. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 434: 787–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Lin X, Tan L, Zhang Q, et al. The in vitro degradation process and biocompatibility of a ZK60 magnesium alloy with a forsteritecontaining micro-arc oxidation coating. Acta Biomaterialia, 2013, 9(10): 8631–8642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Cui Z, Li X, Xiao K, et al. Atmospheric corrosion of field-exposed AZ31 magnesium in a tropical marine environment. Corrosion Science, 2013, 76(Supplement C): 243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Zeng R C, Li X T, Liu L J, et al. In vitro degradation of pure Mg for esophageal stent in artificial saliva. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2016, 32(5): 437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Zong Y, Yuan G, Zhang X, et al. Comparison of biodegradable behaviors of AZ31 and Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloys in Hank’s physiological solution. Materials Science and Engineering B, 2012, 177(5): 395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    Shahabi-Navid M, Esmaily M, Svensson J E, et al. NaCl-induced atmospheric corrosion of the MgAl alloy AM50 — The influence of CO2. Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 2014, 161(6): C277–C287Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Esmaily M, Shahabi-Navid M, Svensson J E, et al. Influence of temperature on the atmospheric corrosion of the Mg–Al alloy AM50. Corrosion Science, 2015, 90(Supplement C): 420–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    Rashidian M, Fattahi A. Comparison of thermochemistry of aspartame (artificial sweetener) and glucose. Carbohydrate Research, 2009, 344(1): 127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ling-Yu Li
    • 1
  • Bin Liu
    • 1
  • Rong-Chang Zeng
    • 1
  • Shuo-Qi Li
    • 1
  • Fen Zhang
    • 1
  • Yu-Hong Zou
    • 3
  • Hongwei George Jiang
    • 2
  • Xiao-Bo Chen
    • 2
  • Shao-Kang Guan
    • 4
  • Qing-Yun Liu
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  2. 2.School of EngineeringRMIT UniversityCarltonAustralia
  3. 3.College of Chemical and Environmental EngineeringShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  4. 4.School of Materials Science and EngineeringZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations