Frontiers of Materials Science

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 129–138 | Cite as

Utilization of surface differences to improve dyeing properties of poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) membranes

  • Shenshen Ouyang
  • Tao Wang
  • Longgang Zhong
  • Shunli Wang
  • Sheng Wang
Research Article


Bulk poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) (PMIA) can achieve flexibility upon dissolution by a LiCl/dimethylacetamide co-solvent, but remains hydrophobic despite the occasional emergence of cis amide groups providing a weak negative charge. In this study, based on the significant surface differences between PMIA membranes processed by nanofiber electrospinning and casting, a series of chemical analyses, in-situ Au nanoparticle depositions, and dye-adsorption experiments revealed that more cis-configuration amide groups appeared on the surface of the electrospun PMIA membrane than on that of the cast membrane. Based on this surface difference, a strategy was proposed to improve the dyeing properties of PMIA by reversibly changing the cis/trans configurations of electrospun and cast membranes. The reversible chain-segment switch mechanism is a novel method for tuning the macroscale properties of polymer materials based on inherent molecular characteristics.


wettability polymer surface difference electrospun PMIA interfaces 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51471153 and 51372227) and the 521 Talent Project of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province Foundation (No. 2017C37017) for providing financial support.

Supplementary material

11706_2018_422_MOESM1_ESM.avi (3.3 mb)
Supplementary material, approximately 3.29 MB.
11706_2018_422_MOESM2_ESM.avi (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material, approximately 1.12 MB.


  1. [1]
    Kurusu R S, Demarquette N R. Blending and morphology control to turn hydrophobic SEBS electrospun mats superhydrophilic. Langmuir, 2015, 31(19): 5495–5503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Uhlmann P, Frenzel R, Voit B, et al. Research agenda surface technology: Future demands for research in the field of coatings materials. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2007, 58(2–3): 122–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Yu X, Wang Z Q, Jiang Y G, et al. Reversible pH-responsive surface: from superhydrophobicity to superhydrophilicity. Advanced Materials, 2005, 17(10): 1289–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Zhang T, Luo T. High-contrast, reversible thermal conductivity regulation utilizing the phase transition of polyethylene nanofibers. ACS Nano, 2013, 7(9): 7592–7600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Chen M, Dong M, Havelund R, et al. Thermo-responsive core–sheath electrospun nanofibers from poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)/polycaprolactone blends. Chemistry of Materials, 2010, 22(14): 4214–4221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Anwar N, Willms T, Grimme B, et al. Light-switchable and monodisperse conjugated polymer particles. ACS Macro Letters, 2013, 2(9): 766–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Xin B, Hao J. Reversibly switchable wettability. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(2): 769–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Anastasiadis S H, Retsos H, Pispas S, et al. Neophytides smart polymer surfaces. Macromolecules, 2003, 36(6): 1994–1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Sandra C D S, Loguercio L F, Corrêa D S, et al. Interfacial properties and thermal stability of modified poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) thin films. Surface and Interface Analysis, 2013, 45(4): 837–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Horrocks A R. Flame retardant challenges for textiles and fibres: New chemistry versus innovatory solutions. Polymer Degradation & Stability, 2011, 96(3): 377–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Nimmanpipug P, Tashiro K, Maeda Y, et al. Factors governing the three-dimensional hydrogen bond network structure of poly(mphenylene isophthalamide) and a series of its model compounds: (1) Systematic classification of structures analyzed by the X-ray diffraction method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2002, 106(27): 6842–6848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Kakida H, Chatani Y, Tadokoro H. Crystal structure of poly(mphenylene isophthalamide). Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 1976, 14(3): 427–435Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Morgenstern B, Kammer H W. Solvation in cellulose–LiCl–DMAc solutions. Trends in Polymer Science, 1996, 4: 87–92Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    McCormick C L, Callais P A, Hutchinson J B H. Solution studies of cellulose in lithium chloride and N,N-dimethylacetmide. Macromolecules, 1985, 18(12): 2394–2401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Yao L, Lee C, Kim J. Fabrication of electrospun meta-aramid nanofibers in different solvent systems. Fibers and Polymers, 2010, 11(7): 1032–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Ren X, Zhao C, Du S, et al. Fabrication of asymmetric poly (mphenylene isophthalamide) nanofiltration membrane for chromium( VI) removal. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2010, 22 (9): 1335–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Zhao C, Du S, Wang T, et al. Arsenic removal from drinking water by self-made PMIA nanofiltration membrane. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 2012, 2(3): 366–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Ouyang S, Wang T, Yu Y, et al. From trans to cis conformation: further understanding the surface properties of poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide). ACS Omega, 2017, 2(1): 290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Skrovanek D J, Howe S E, Painter P C, et al. Hydrogen bonding in polymers: infrared temperature studies of an amorphous polyamide. Macromolecules, 1985, 18(9): 1676–1683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Moore W H, Krimm S. Vibrational analysis of peptides, polypeptides, and proteins. II. β-poly(L-alanine) and β-poly(Lanaylglycine). Biopolymers, 1976, 15: 2465–2483Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Krimm S, Song S, Asher S A. Amide V overtone assignment of a configuration-sensitive band in the UV resonance Raman spectra of peptides and proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1989, 111(12): 4290–4294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Mishra A K, Chattopadhyay D K, Sreedhar B, et al. FT-IR and XPS studies of polyurethane-urea-imide coatings. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2006, 55(3): 231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Spanjaard D, Guillot C, Desjonqueres M C, et al. Surface core level spectroscopy of transition metals: A new tool for the determination of their surface structure. Surface Science Reports, 1985, 5(1–2): 1–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Advanced Textile Materials and Manufacturing Technology (Ministry of Education)Zhejiang Sci-Tech UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations