Abstract
This paper attempts to argue that most adaptive systems, such as evolutionary or learning systems, have inherently multiple objectives to deal with. Very often, there is no single solution that can optimize all the objectives. In this case, the concept of Pareto optimality is key to analyzing these systems.
To support this argument, we first present an example that considers the robustness and evolvability trade-off in a redundant genetic representation for simulated evolution. It is well known that robustness is critical for biological evolution, since without a sufficient degree of mutational robustness, it is impossible for evolution to create new functionalities. On the other hand, the genetic representation should also provide the chance to find new phenotypes, i.e., the ability to innovate. This example shows quantitatively that a trade-off between robustness and innovation does exist in the studied redundant representation.
Interesting results will also be given to show that new insights into learning problems can be gained when the concept of Pareto optimality is applied to machine learning. In the first example, a Pareto-based multi-objective approach is employed to alleviate catastrophic forgetting in neural network learning. We show that learning new information and memorizing learned knowledge are two conflicting objectives, and a major part of both information can be memorized when the multi-objective learning approach is adopted. In the second example, we demonstrate that a Pareto-based approach can address neural network regularizationmore elegantly. By analyzing the Pareto-optimal solutions, it is possible to identifying interesting solutions on the Pareto front.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ancel L, Bull J. Fighting change with change: adaptive variation in an uncertain world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2002, 17(12): 551–557
Tononi G, Sporns O, Edelman G. A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 1994, 91: 5033–5031
Teo J, Abbass H. Multiobjectivity and complexity in embodied cognition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2005, 9(4): 337–360
Louis S, Rawlines G. Pareto optimality, GA-easiness and deception. In: Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993, 118–123
Knowles J, Watson R, Corne D. Reducing local optima in singleobjective problems by multi-objectivization. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Evolutionary Muti-Griterion Optimization. Berlin: Springer, LNCS, 2001, 1993: 269–283
Jensen M. Helper-objectives: using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for single-objective optimization. Journal of Mathematical Modeling and Algorithms, 2004, 3(4): 323–347
Bui L, Branke J, Abbass H. Multi-objective optimization for dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE, 2005, 2349–2356
Jin Y, Sendhoff B. Pareto-based multi-objective machine learning: an overview and case studies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 2008, 38(3): 397–415
Allman J. Evolving Brains. Scientific American Library, 1999
Jones B, Jin Y, Sendhoff B, Yao X. Evolving functional symmetry in a three dimensional model of an elongated organism. Artificial Life XI, 2008, 305–312
Stearns S. Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Functional Ecology, 1989, 3: 259–268
Mukhopadhyay A, Tissenbaum H. Reproduction and longevity: secrets revealed by c. elegans. Trends in Cell Biology, 2007, 17(2): 65–71
Paenke I, Branke J, Jin Y. On the influence of phenotype plasticity on genotype diversity. In: Proceedings of 2007 IEEE Symposium on Foudations of Computational Intelligence (FOCI), 2007, 33–40
Charnov E, Ernest S. The offspring-size / clutch-size trade-off in mammals. The American Naturalist, 2006, 167(4): 578–582
Handl J, Kell D, Knowles J. Multi-objective optimization in computational biology and bioinformatics. ACM/IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformations, 2007, 4: 279–292
Kitano H. Biological robustness. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2004, 5(11): 826–837
Wagner A. Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems. Princeton University Press, 2007
Lenski R, Barrick J, Ofria C. Balancing robustness and evolvability. Public Library of Science Biology, 2006, 4(2): e428
Cilibert S, Martin O, Wagner A. Innovation and robustness in complex gene networks. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United states of America, 2007, 104(34): 13591–13596
Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratab A, Meyarivan T. A fast elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Schoenauer M, Deb K, Rudolph G, et al. eds. Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference. Paris: Springer, LNCS, 2000, 1917: 849–858
Lehre P K, Haddow P C. Phenotypic complexity and local variations in neutral degree. Biosystems, 2007, 87: 233–242
Kirschner M, Gerhart J. Evolvability. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United states of America, 1998, 95(15): 8420–8427
Fernández P, Solé R V. Neutral fitness landscapes in signalling networks. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface / the Royal Society, 2007, 4: 41–47
Stadler B M R, Stadler P F, Wagner G P, Fontana W. The topology of the possible: formal spaces underlying patterns of evolutionary change. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2000, 213: 41–47
Gruna R. Analysis of redundant genotype-phenotype mappings—Investigation of the effect of neutrality on evolvability and robustness. Master’s thesis. Universität Karlsruhe, 2007
Magurran A. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, 1988
Yu T. Program evolvability under environmental variations and neutrality. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Life (ECAL 2007), 2007, 835–844
Jin Y. Fuzzy modeling of high-dimensional systems: complexity reduction and interpretability improvement. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8(2): 212–221
Jin Y, Advanced Fuzzy Systems Design and Applications. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag/Springer-Verlag, 2003
Igel C. Multi-objective model selection for support vector machines. In: Proceedings of Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, LNCS, 2005, 3410: 534–546
Olshausen B. Relations between the statistics of narutal image and the response property of cortical cells. Nature, 1996, 381: 607–609
Abraham W, Robins A. Memory retention—the synaptic stability versus plasticity dilemma. Trends in Neuroscience, 2005, 28(2): 73–78
McCloskey M, Cohen N. Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: the sequential learning problem. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 1989, 24: 109–165
French R. Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1999, 3(4): 128–135
Jin Y, Sendhoff B. Alleviating catastrophic forgetting via multiobjective learning. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2006, 3335–3342
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, Y., Gruna, R. & Sendhoff, B. Pareto analysis of evolutionary and learning systems. Front. Comput. Sci. China 3, 4–17 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-009-0004-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-009-0004-8