Skip to main content
Log in

Arnetminer: expertise oriented search using social networks

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expertise Oriented Search (EOS) aims at providing comprehensive expertise analysis on data from distributed sources. It is useful in many application domains, for example, finding experts on a given topic, detecting the confliction of interest between researchers, and assigning reviewers to proposals. In this paper, we present the design and implementation of our expertise oriented search system, Arnetminer (http://www.arnetminer.net). Arnetminer has gathered and integrated information about a half-million computer science researchers from the Web, including their profiles and publications. Moreover, Arnetminer constructs a social network among these researchers through their co-authorship, and utilizes this network information as well as the individual profiles to facilitate expertise oriented search tasks. In particular, the co-authorship information is used both in ranking the expertise of individual researchers for a given topic and in searching for associations between researchers. We have conducted initial experiments on Arnetminer. Our results demonstrate that the proposed relevancy propagation expert finding method outperforms the method that only uses person local information, and the proposed two-stage association search on a large-scale social network is order of magnitude faster than the baseline method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Citeseer. http://www.citeseer.nec.com

  2. Aleman-Meza B, Nagarajan M, Ramakrishnan C, et al. Semantic analytics on social networks: experiences in addressing the problem of conflict of interest detection. In: Proceedings of www’ 06. New York: ACM, 2006, 407–416

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Hettich S, Pazzani MJ. Mining for proposal reviewers: lessons learned at the national science foundation. In: Proceedings of KDD’ 06. New York: ACM, 2006, 862–871

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Golbeck J. Web-based social networks: a survey and future directions. Technique Report

  5. Brickley D, Miller L. FOAF vocabulary specification. Namespace Document, http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/

  6. Kruk S R, Decker S. Semantic social collaborative filtering with FOAFRealm. In: Proceedings of the Semantic Desktop Workshop. Galway, Ireland, 2005

  7. Foafnaut. http://www.foafnaut.org/

  8. Flink. http://flink.semanticweb.org/

  9. Culotta A, Bekkerman R, McCallum A. Extracting social networks and contact information from email and the web. In: Proceedings of Email and Spam. AAAI 2004

  10. Kautz H, Selman B, Shah M. Combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Communications of the ACM, 1997, New York: ACM, 40(3): 63–65

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mika P. Flink: Semantic Web technology for the extraction and analysis of social networks. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2005, 3(2): 211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsuo Y, Mori J, Hamasaki M. POLYPHONE: an advanced social network extraction system from the web. In: Proceedings of www’ 06. New York: ACM, 2006, 397–406

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Balog K, Rijke Md. Searching for people in the personal work space. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Intelligent Information Access, 2006

  14. Ding L, Finin T, Joshi A, et al. Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Mangement. New York: ACM, 2004, 652–659

    Google Scholar 

  15. Libra. http://libra.msra.cn/

  16. Rexa. http://rexa.info/

  17. Doan A, Ramakrishnan R, Chen F, et al. Community information management. Data Enginneering, 2006, 29(1): 64–72

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hawking D. Challenges in enterprise search. In: Proceedings of the 15th Australasian database conference. Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc, 2004, 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nascimento M A, Sander J, Pound J. Analysis of SIGMOD’s coauthorship graph. ACM SIGMOD Record, 2003, 32(3): 8–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smeaton A F, Keogh G, Gurrin C, et al. Analysis of papers from twenty-five years of SIGIR conferences: what have we been doing for the last quarter of a century. ACM SIGIR Forum, 2002, 36(2): 39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell C S, Maglio P P, Cozzi A, et al. Expertise identification using email communications. In: Proceedings of CIKM’ 03. New York: ACM, 2003, 528–531

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz M F, Wood D C M. Discovering shared interests using graph analysis. Communications of the ACM, 1993, 36(8): 78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Foner L N. Yenta: a multi-agent, referral-based matchmaking system. In: Proceedings of First International Conference on Autonomous Agents. New York: ACM, 1997, 301–307

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Mattox D, Maybury M, Morey D. Enterprise expert and knowledge discovery. In: Proceedings of HCI. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1999, 303–307

    Google Scholar 

  25. Seid D Y, Kobsa A. Expert finding systems for organizations: problem and domain analysis and the demoir approach. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2003, 13: 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Craswell N, Vries A P D, Soboroff I. Overview of the trec-2005 enterprise track. TREC 2005 Conference Notebook. 2005, 199–205

  27. Fu Y, Yu W, Li Y, et al. THUIR at trec 2005: enterprise track. In: Proceedings of TREC’ 05. 2005, 733–738

  28. Cao Y, Liu J, Bao S, et al. Research on expert search at enterprise track of trec 2005. In: Proceedings of TREC’ 05. TREC, 2005 29. Adamic L, Adar E. How to search a social network. Social Networks, 2005, 27: 187–203

    Google Scholar 

  29. Adamic L, Adar E. How to search a social network. Social Networks, 2005, 27: 187–203

    Google Scholar 

  30. Foaf. http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/

  31. Carroll J J, Reynolds D, Dickinson I, et al. Jena: implementing the semantic web recommendations. In: Proceedings ofwww’ 04. New York: ACM, 2004, 74–83

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liang B, Tang J, Li J. SWARMS: a tool for exploring domain knowledge. In: Proceedings of the Workshop of Contexts and Ontologies on the 20th International AAAI Conference. 2005, 120–123

  33. DBLP. http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/:_ley/db/

  34. Vapnik V. Statistical learning theory. New York: Springer Verlage, 1998

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Tang J, Li J, Lu H, et al. IASA: learning to annotate the semantic web. Journal of Data Semantics, 2005, 4: 110–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tang J, Li H, Cao Y, et al. Email data cleaning. In: Proceedings of KDD’ 05. New York: ACM, 2005, 489–498

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Milgram S. The small world problem. Psychology Today, 1967, 2: 60–67

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juanzi Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Tang, J., Zhang, J. et al. Arnetminer: expertise oriented search using social networks. Front. Comput. Sci. China 2, 94–105 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-008-0008-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-008-0008-9

Keywords

Navigation