Frontiers of Agriculture in China

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 190–198 | Cite as

Effects of Bt transgenic crops on soil ecosystems: a review of a ten-year research in China

Review

Abstract

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic cotton is the unique Bt transgenic crop planted on a large scale in China, and its commercialized varieties and hectareage had increased rapidly in China during the past decade (1997–2006) with broad geographic distribution for the economic, environmental, and health benefits. In 2004, the planting area of Bt transgenic cotton in China ranked first worldwide with up to 370 × 106 hm2. In addition, Bt transgenic rice varieties in field tests have been close to approval for commercialization. However, ecological risks, a complex issue of Bt transgenic crops on soil ecosystem is urgently faced in China due to more than 60 varieties transferred single or bivalent Bt genes grown under diverse geographic regions. Two main pathways, biomass incorporation and root exudates, are involved in the effects of Bt transgenic crops on soil ecosystems. In this paper, the research results in recent years in China involved in the effects of Bt transgenic crops (Bt transgenic cottons and rice) on soil ecosystems were summarized with special attentions paid to the release and persistence of Bt toxins, and the toxicology to microorganisms, as well as the change of soil biochemical properties in soils where Bt transgenic crops were planted or incubated with their biomass. In addition, the complexity and current research defaults of ecological risk evaluation of Bt transgenic crops in China were highlighted.

Keywords

Bt transgenic crops soil ecosystems enzyme activity microorganisms Bt toxins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angle J S (1994). Release of transgenic plants: biodiversity and population-level considerations. Molecular Ecology, 3: 45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai Y Y, Jiang M X, Cheng J A (2007). Impacts of environmental factors on degradation of Cry1Ab insecticial protein in leaf-blade powders of transgenic Bt rice. Agricultural Sciences in China, 6(2): 167–174 (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai Y Y, Jiang M X, Cheng J A, Shen H M, Yang P, Chen Z X, Jiang Y H, Shu Q Y (2004). Degradation of Cry1Ab toxin protein expressed by Bt transgenic rice in paddy soils. Chinese J Rice Science, 18(3): 255–261 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Brookes G, Barfoot P (2006). Global impact of biotech crops: socioeconomic and environmental effects in the first ten years of commercial use. AgBioForum, 9(3): 139–151Google Scholar
  5. Bruinsma M, Kowalchuk G A, van Veen J A (2003). Effects of genetically modified plants on microbial communities and processes in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 37: 329–337Google Scholar
  6. Bruns H A, Abel C A (2003). Nitrogen fertility effects on Bt-andotoxin and nitrogen concentrations of maize during early growth. Agron J, 95: 207–211Google Scholar
  7. Castaldini M, Turrini A, Sbrana C, Benedetti A, Marchionni M, Fabiani A, Landi S, Santomassimo F, Pietrangeli B, Nuti M P, Miclaus N, Giovannetti M (2005). Impact of Bt maize on rhizospheric and soil eubacterial communities and on beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis in experimental microcosms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71: 6719–6729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crecchio C, Stotzky G (1998). Insecticidal activity and biodegradation of the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki bound to humic acids from soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30: 463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crecchio C, Stotzky G (2001). Biodegradation and insecticidal activity of the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki bound to complexes of montmorillonite-humic acids-Al hydroxypolymers. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33: 573–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cui J J, Xia J Y (1999). Studies on the resistance dynamic of the Bt transgenic cotton on cotton bollworm. Acta Gossypii Sinica, 11: 141–146 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Donegan K K, Palm C J, Fieland V J (1995). Changes in levels, species, and DNA fingerprints of soil microorganism associated with cotton expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki endotoxin. Applied Soil Ecology, 2(2): 111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donegan K K, Seidler R J, Doyle J D, Porteous L A, Digiovanni G, Widmer F, Watrud L S (1999). A field study with genetically engineered alfalfa inoculated with recombinant Sinorhizobium meloloti: Effects on soil ecosystems. J Applied Ecol, 36: 920–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong Z Q, Zhao M, Shu W H, Zhang B M, Hao H J (2006). The subcellular localization of the Bt crystal protein in transgenic Bt cotton cell. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 32(12): 1924–1926 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Escher N, Kach B, Nentwig W (2000). Decomposition of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis maize by microorganisms and woodlice Porcello scaber (Crustacea:Isopoda). Bas Appl Ecol, 1, 161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferry N, Edwards M G, Gatehouse J, Capell T, Christou P, Gatehouse A M R (2006). Transgenic plants for insect pest control: a forward looking scientific perspective. Transgenic Research, 15: 13–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Firbank L, Lonsdale M, Poppy G (2005). Reassessing the environmental risks of GM crops. Nature Biotechnology, 12: 1475–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flores S, Saxena D, Stotzky G (2005). Transgenic Bt plants decompose less in soil than non-Bt plants. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 37: 1073–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grayston S J, Wang S, Campbell C D (1998). Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30: 369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hails R S (2000). Genetically modified plants-the debate continues. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15: 14–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heritage J (2004). The fate of transgenes in the human gut. Nature Biotechnology, 22: 170–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hilbeck A, Moar, W J, Pusztai-Carey M, Filippini A, Bigler F (1998). Toxicityof Bacillus thuringensis Cry1Ab toxin to the predator Chrysoperla carnea. Environmental Entomology, 27: 1255–1263Google Scholar
  22. Huang J K, Hu F R, Pray C, Qiao F B, Rozelle S (2003). Biotechnology as an alternative to chemical pesticides: a case study of Bt cotton in China. Agricultural Economics, 29: 55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang J K, Rozelle S, Pray C, Wang Q F (2002). Plant biotechnology in China. Nature, 295: 674–676Google Scholar
  24. Jepson, P C, Croft, B A, Pratt, G E (1994). Test systems to determine the ecological risks posed by toxin release from Bacillus thuringiensis genes in crop plants. Molecular Ecology, 3: 81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li Y H, Zhang Y J, Wu K M, Yuan G H, Guo Y Y (2005). Degradation dynamics of Cry1Ac insecticidal protein in leaves of Bt cotton under different environments. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 38(4): 714–718 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Liu B, Zeng Q W, Yan F M, Xu H G, Xu C R (2005). Effects of transgenic plants on soil microorganisms. Plant and Soil, 271: 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu W K, Du L F (2007). Effects of P fertilization on growth of Bt transgenic cotton seedlings. China Cotton, (8): 14–15 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Liu W K, Du L F (2008). Interactions between Bt transgenic crops and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a new urgent soil ecology issue in agroecosystems. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Plant Soil Science, 58(2): 187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Losey J E, Rayor L S, Carter M E (1999). Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature, 399: 214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Netherwood T, Matin-Orue S M, O’Donnell A G (2004). Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract. Nature Biotechnology, 22: 204–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palm C J, Schaller D L, Donegan K K, Seidler R J (1996). Persistence in soil of transgenic plant produced Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki δ-endotoxin. Canadian J Microbiology, 42: 1258–1262Google Scholar
  32. Rui Y K (2005). Dynamics of Bt toxin and plant hormones in rhizosphere system of transgenic insecticidal cotton (Gossy posium L.). Letters in Biotechnology, 16(5): 515–517 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Rui Y K, Yi G X, Guo J, Guo X, Luo Y B, Wang B M, Li Z H (2007). Transgenic cotton could safely be grown since CpTI toxin rapidly degrades in the rhizosphere soil. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Plant Soil Science, 57(2): 122–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rui Y K, Yi G X, Zhao J, Wang B M, Li Z H, Zhai Z X, He Z P, Li Q X (2005). Changes of Bt toxin in the rhizosphere of transgenic Bt cotton and its influence on soil functional bacteria. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 21: 1279–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sachs E S, Benedict J H, Stelly D M, Taylor J F, Altman D W, Berberich S A, Davis S K (1998). Expression and segregation of genes encoding CryIA insecticidal proteins in cotton. Crop Science, 38: 1–11Google Scholar
  36. Saxena D, Flores S, Stotzky G (1999). Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn. Nature, 402: 480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Saxena D, Stotzky G (2000). Insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is released from roots of transgenic Bt corn in vitro and in situ. FEMS Microbiological Ecology, 33: 35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001)a. Bacillus thuringiensis toxin released from root exudates and biomass of Bt corn has no apparent effect on earthworms, nematodes, protozoa, bacteria, and fungi in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33: 1225–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001)b. Bt corn has a higher lignin content than non-Bt corn. Am J Bot, 88: 1704–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001)c. Bt toxin uptake from soil by plants. Nature Biotechnology, 19: 199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saxena D, Stotzky G (2002). Bt toxin is not taken up from soil or hydroponic by maize, radish, or turnip. Plant and Soil, 239: 165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shen R F, Cai H, Gong W H (2006). Transgenic Bt cotton has no apparent effect on enzymatic activities or functional diversity of microbial communities in rhizosphere soil. Plant and Soil, 285: 149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sims S R, Holden L R (1996). Insect bioassay for determining soil degradation of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki CryIA (b) protein in corn tissues. Environ Entomology, 25: 659–664Google Scholar
  44. Sims S R, Ream J E (1997). Soil inactivation of the Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki CryIIA insecticidal protein within transgenic cotton tissue: laboratory microcosm and field studies. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 45: 1502–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Snow A, Palma P M (1997). Commercialization of transgenic plants: potential ecological risks. BioScience, 47: 86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stotzky G (2000). Persistence and biological activity in soil of insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis and of bacterial DNA bound on clays and humic acids. J Environmental Quality, 29: 691–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sun C X, Chen L J, Wu Z J (2005). Bt toxin distribution in transgenic Bt cotton and soil system. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 16(9): 1765–1768 (in Chinese)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sun C X, Chen L J, Wu Z J, Wu Q, Chen C R (2004). Photosynthetic characters and Bt toxin content of different transgenic Bt cotton. Chinese J of Applied Ecology, 15(10): 1878–1882 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  49. Sun C X, Chen L J, Wu Z J, Zhou L K (2007)a. Soil persistence of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin from transgenic Bt cotton tissues and its effect on soil enzyme activities. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 43: 617–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sun C X, Zhang L L, Wu Q, Miao L, Wang G W, Li S J (2007)b. Nitrogen metabolism of transgenic Bt cotton and transgenic Bt CpTI cotton at seedling stage. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 26(2): 187–191 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  51. Tabashnik B E (1994). Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annual Review of Entomology, 39: 47–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tapp H, Stotzky G (1995). Insecticidal activity of the toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki and tenebrionis adsorbed and bound on pure and soil clays. Appl Environ Microbiol, 61(5): 1786–1790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tapp H, Stotzky G (1998). Persistence of the insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30: 471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Traore S B, Carlson R E, Pilcher C D (2000). Bt and non-Bt maize growth and development as affected by temperature and drought stress. Agron J, 92: 1027–1035Google Scholar
  55. Turrini A, Sbrana C, Nuti M P, Pietrangeli B M, Giovannetti M (2005). Development of a model system to assess the impact of genetically modified maize and aubergine plants on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil, 1(2): 69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang H Y, Ye Q F, Wang W, Wu L C, Wu W X (2006). Cry1Ab protein from Bt transgenic rice does not residue in rhizosphere soil. Environmental Pollution, 143: 449–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang Y Q, Johnston S (2007). The status of GM rice R&D in China. Nature Biotechnology, 25(7): 717–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Watrud L S, Seidler R J, Huang PM, Adriano D C, Logan T J, Checkai R T (1998). Nontarget ecological effects of plant, microbial and chemical introductions to terrestrial system. In: Huang P M, ed. Soil Chemistry and Ecosystem Health. Madison, Special Publication, Vol 52. Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America, 313–340Google Scholar
  59. Wolfenbarger L L, Phifer P R (2000). The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science, 290: 2088–2093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu L C, Li X F, Ye Q F, Wang H Y (2004). Expression and root exudation of Cry1Ab toxin protein in cry1Ab transgenic rice and its residue in rhizosphere soil. Environmental Science, 25(5): 116–121Google Scholar
  61. Wu W X, Ye Q F, Min H (2004)a. Effect of straws from Bt-transgenic rice on selected biological activities in water-flooded soil. European Journal of Soil Biology, 40: 15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wu W X, Ye Q F, Min H, Duan X J, Jin W M (2004)b. Bt-transgenic rice straw affects the culturable microbiota and dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities in a flooded paddy soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 36: 289–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang B H, Liu F, Yao C B, Wang K B (2000). Recent progress in cotton biotechnology and genetic engineering in China. Current Science, 79 (1): 37–44Google Scholar
  64. Zhang B H, Wang Q L (2001). Bt-cotton in China. Current Science, 81 (4): 332–333Google Scholar
  65. Zhang L L, Wu Z J, Chen L J, Sun C X (2006). Effects of transgenic cotton planting on soil hydrolase activity. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25(11): 1348–1351 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesKey Laboratory of Agro-Environment & Climate Change, MOABeijingChina

Personalised recommendations