Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-port robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy is associated with decreased post-operative narcotic use in a propensity score matched analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has proven to be an effective minimally invasive option for benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) in recent years. Single-site surgery is theorized to reduce post-operative pain beyond traditional minimally invasive approaches. We sought to assess whether use of a single-port robotic platform decreases post-operative opioid use in patients undergoing robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing RASP our institution from November 2017 to July 2019. Demographic, intraoperative, and post-operative data, including morphine equivalent (ME) use, were collected. Patients were stratified by robotic platform utilized. Propensity score matching using nearest neighbor method was performed using prostate volume, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and post-op ketorolac use in 4:1 fashion. Chi-squared analysis and Kruskal–Wallis analyses were utilized. Two-hundred-and-seven men underwent RASP. After matching, 80 patients (64 multi-port, 16 single-port) were included in the analysis. Groups were comparable for age, body mass index, CCI, prostate volume, prior opioid use, and use of scheduled ketorolac post op. The single-port approach was associated with a reduction in MEs once admitted to the floor (5 vs. 11 mg, p = 0.025) and an increase in the proportion of patients who did not require any narcotics post-operatively (44 vs. 19%, p = 0.036). In a propensity matched cohort of patients undergoing RASP at a single institution, use of the single-port robotic system conferred a significant decrease in post-operative narcotic use by approximately 50%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Available upon request.

References

  1. Roehrborn CG (2005) Benign prostatic hyperplasia: an overview. Rev Urol, 7(Suppl 9):S3–S14

  2. Yang Q, Peters TJ, Donovan JL, Wilt TJ, Abrams P (2001) Transurethral incision compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Urol 165:1526–1532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCullough TC, Heldwein FL, Soon SJ, Galiano M, Barret E, Cathelineau X et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: an evaluation of morbidity. J Endourol 23:129–133. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano MB, Sanchez-Salas R, Sotelo RJ, Chlosta PL et al (2015) Perioperative Outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a European-American multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol 68:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sorokin I, Sundaram V, Singla N, Walker J, Margulis V, Roehrborn C et al (2017) Robot-assisted versus open simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands: a propensity score-matched comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes. J Endourol 31:1164–1169. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones P, Alzweri L, Rai BP, Somani BK, Bates C, Aboumarzouk OM (2016) Holmium laser enucleation versus simple prostatectomy for treating large prostates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arab J Urol 14:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2015.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, Stern JM, Cadeddu JA (2007) Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology 70:1039–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber G-P, Crouzet S, Stein RJ (2009) Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report. BJU Int 103:366–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07949.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Steinberg RL, Johnson BA, Meskawi M, Gettman MT, Cadeddu JA (2019) Magnet-assisted robotic prostatectomy using the da Vinci SP robot: an initial case series. J Endourol 33:829–834. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Steinberg RL, Johnson BA, Cadeddu JA (2019) Ureteral reconstruction using the DaVinci SP robotic platform: an initial case series. J Endourol Case Rep 5(2):60–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaouk J, Garisto J, Eltemamy M, Bertolo R (2019) Step-by-step technique for single-port robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph nodes dissection using the da Vinci® SPTM surgical system. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaouk J, Garisto J, Eltemamy M, Bertolo R (2019) Pure Single-site robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using the SP Surgical system: initial clinical experience. Urology 124:282–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaouk JH, Bertolo R (2019) Single-site robotic platform in clinical practice: first cases in the USA. Minerva Urol Nefrol 71:294–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaouk J, Bertolo R, Eltemamy M, Garisto J (2019) Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: first clinical experience using the SP surgical system. Urology 124:309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.10.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Steinberg RL, Passoni N, Garbens A, Johnson BA, Gahan JC (2020) Initial experience with extraperitoneal robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy using the da Vinci SP surgical system. J Robot Surg 14:601–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-01029-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, Brandina R, Goldfarb DA, Shoskes D et al (2010) Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 57:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Park YH, Park JH, Jeong CW, Kim HH (2010) Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy with conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol 24:997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiori C, Bertolo R, Manfredi M, Mele F, Amparore D, Cattaneo G et al (2017) Robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site versus mini-laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparison of perioperative, functional and cosmetic results. Minerva Urol Nefrol 69:604–612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kliethermes C, Blazek K, Ali K, Nijjar JB, Kliethermes S, Guan X (2017) Postoperative pain after single-site versus multiport hysterectomy. JSLS. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00065

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fagotti A, Bottoni C, Vizzielli G, Gueli Alletti S, Scambia G, Marana E et al (2011) Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril 96(255–259):e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Manchikanti L, Helm S, Fellows B, Janata JW, Pampati V, Grider JS et al (2012) Opioid epidemic in the United States. Pain Physician 15:ES9-38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ben-David B, Swanson J, Nelson JB, Chelly JE (2007) Multimodal analgesia for radical prostatectomy provides better analgesia and shortens hospital stay. J Clin Anesth 19:264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.12.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun EC, Darnall BD, Baker LC, Mackey S (2016) Incidence of and Risk factors for chronic opioid use among opioid-naive patients in the postoperative period. JAMA Intern Med 176:1286–1293. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3298

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsai S-H, Tseng P-T, Sherer BA, Lai Y-C, Lin P-Y, Wu C-K et al (2019) Open versus robotic partial nephrectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary studies. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 15:e1963. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goel R, Lomanto D (2012) Controversies in single-port laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:380–382. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182615776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaouk JH, Goel RK (2009) Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 55:1163–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P et al (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24:1842–1848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vigneswaran HT, Schwarzman LS, Francavilla S, Abern MR, Crivellaro S (2020) A comparison of perioperative outcomes between single-port and multiport robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 77:671–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lenfant L, Sawczyn G, Aminsharifi A, Kim S, Wilson CA, Beksac AT et al (2020) Pure Single-site robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using single-port versus multiport robotic radical prostatectomy: a single-institution comparative study. Eur Urol Focus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sawczyn G, Lenfant L, Aminsharifi A, Kim S, Kaouk J (2020) Predictive factors for opioid-free management after robotic radical prostatectomy: the value of the SP® Robotic Platform. Minerva Urol E Nefrol https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04038-2

  31. Koo K, Faisal F, Gupta N, Meyer AR, Patel HD, Pierorazio PM et al (2020) Recommendations for opioid prescribing after endourological and minimally invasive urological surgery: an expert panel consensus. J Urol 203:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DWH, Chan KC, Ko CW, Cheung HY et al (2003) Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1624–1627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8718-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey C. Gahan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganesan, V., Steinberg, R.L., Garbens, A. et al. Single-port robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy is associated with decreased post-operative narcotic use in a propensity score matched analysis. J Robotic Surg 16, 295–300 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01236-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01236-1

Keywords

Navigation