Skip to main content

In experienced hands, does the robotic platform impact operative efficiency? Comparison of the da Vinci Si versus Xi robot in colorectal surgery

Abstract

Robotic surgical platforms have aimed to assist surgeons in meeting the challenges accompanying minimally invasive colon and rectal surgical procedures. Since early adoption over decade ago, there has been an evolution of the robotic platforms aimed at improved usability. We hypothesize, when compared to da Vinci Si, the Xi will allow for greater efficiency and result in shorter operative times. A case log review was completed for a single colorectal surgeon with 7 years’ robotic experience, totaling over 800 cases. Patients were identified using CPT code S2900 (robot) for the most recent 15 months (January 2018–March 2019) contemporaneously at two tertiary care teaching hospitals; one equipped with the Si platform and the other with the Xi. A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing sigmoid colon resection or low anterior rectal resection (LAR) was completed. Categorical values were assessed using Fisher’s exact test or Chi-square tests. Continuous data was compared using unpaired t test. 158 patients were identified as undergoing robotic major colonic surgical resection. A total of 93 patients underwent robotic sigmoid resection or LAR and were grouped based on the robotic platform used (Si, n = 52 vs. Xi, n = 41). The Xi group had significantly shorter surgical times for LAR and sigmoid resection, 162 vs 238 min (p = 0.0001). In the hands of an experienced surgeon, the da Vinci Xi system results in shorter operative times when performing sigmoid resection or LAR compared to older platforms. The da Vinci Xi may allow for improved efficiency as reflected by shorter operative times.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas HGM, de Lange-de Klerk SME, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Avgenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker JJ, Müller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003432.pub2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobs M, Veredeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weitman E, Saleh M, Marescaux J, Martin TR, Ballantyne GH (2016) Robotic colorectal surgery: evolution and future. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 27:121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozben V, Cengiz TB, Atasoy D, Bayraktar O, Aghayeva A, Erguner I, Baca B, Hamzaoglu I, Karahasanoglu T (2016) Is da Vinci Xi better than da Vinci Si in robotic rectal cancer surgery? Comparison of the 2 generations of da Vinci systems. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 26:417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel M, Hemal A (2018) Does Advancing technology improve outcomes? Comparison of the Da Vinci standard/S/Si to the Xi robotic platforms during robotic nephroureterectomy. J Endourol 32:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Protyniak B, Jorden J, Farmer R (2018) Multiquadrant robotic colorectal surgery: the da Vinci Xi vs Si comparison. J Robot Surg 12:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ngu JC, Tsang CB, Koh DC (2017) The da Vinci Xi: a review of its capabilities, versatility, and potential role in robotic colorectal surgery. Robot Surg 4:77–85

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was provided for this project.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James McCormick.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ashley Hill declares no conflict of interest. James McCormick is a proctor for Intuitive Surgical.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hill, A., McCormick, J. In experienced hands, does the robotic platform impact operative efficiency? Comparison of the da Vinci Si versus Xi robot in colorectal surgery. J Robotic Surg 14, 789–792 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01055-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01055-w

Keywords

  • da Vinci Xi
  • da Vinci Si
  • Robotic surgery
  • Rectal cancer
  • Learning curve