Abstract
Several works stress the importance of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (TAPb) for post-operative analgesia and its versatility in all types of abdominal surgery, thanks to laparotomy and laparoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of TAPb on intra- and post-operative analgesia in the first 24 h after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). TAPb is a new local anesthetic technique which provides analgesia after abdominal surgery. It involves injection of local anesthetic into the plane between the transversus abdominis and the internal oblique muscles. TAPb can be performed according to a landmark technique, either through the lumbar triangle or with ultrasound guidance. We evaluated the intra- and post-operative analgesic efficacy of TAPb in 100 ASA I–III patients undergoing RARP under general anesthesia without (group A, 50 patients) or with US-TAPb (group B, 50 patients), in the first 24 post-operative hours. After induction of general anesthesia, US-TAPb was performed in 50 selected patients. All patients received post-operative analgesia (Paracetamol 1 g) three times a day. Tramadol and Ketoprofen were used as rescue drugs if the Numerical Rating Scale test was > 3. No complications were recorded during block performance. A significant reduction was seen in the need to administer intraoperative opioids, and in the occurrence of post-operative pain or post-operative drug consumption in patients receiving US-TAPb. Seven patients, all in group A, received 100 mg of Tramadol. In group B, only one patient received 100 mg Tramadol (first and second post-operative days) due to surgical complications. In conclusion, US-TAPb provided highly effective intra- and post-operative analgesia in the first 24 h after RARP. A further prospective study is necessary to assess the best protocol for all patients.
References
Gezginci E, Ozkaptan O, Yalcin S et al (2015) Postoperative pain and neuromuscular complications associated with patient positioning after robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective non-placebo and non-randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 47:1635–1641
Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y et al (2007) Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care 35:616–617
Børglum J, Maschmann C, Belhage B et al (2011) Ultrasound-guided bilateral dual transversus abdominis plane block: a new four-point approach. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55:658–663
Findlay JM, Ashraf SQ, Congahan P (2012) Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks—a review. Surgeon 10:361–367
Elkassabany N, Ahmed M, Malkowicz SB et al (2013) Comparison between the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and placebo in open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. J Clin Anesth 25:459–465
Skjelsager A, Ruhnau B, Kistorp TK et al (2013) Transversus abdominis plane block or subcutaneous wound infiltration after open radical prostatectomy: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57:502–508
Burlacu CL, Buggy DJ (2008) Update on local anesthetics: focus on levobupivacaine. Ther Clin Risk Manag 4:381–392
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Fabrizio Dal Moro, Luca Aiello, Paola Pavarin and Fabio Zattoni declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in the present study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its last amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dal Moro, F., Aiello, L., Pavarin, P. et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (US-TAPb) for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a novel ‘4-point’ technique—results of a prospective, randomized study. J Robotic Surg 13, 147–151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0858-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0858-6