Advertisement

Safe adoption of robotic colorectal surgery using structured training: early Irish experience

  • Mohammed AradaibEmail author
  • Paul Neary
  • Adnan Hafeez
  • Reza Kalbassi
  • Amjad Parvaiz
  • Diarmuid O’Riordain
Original Article
  • 103 Downloads

Abstract

Robotic surgery enhances the precision of minimally invasive surgery through improved three-dimensional views and articulated instruments. There has been increasing interest in adopting this technology to colorectal surgery and this has recently been introduced to the Irish health system. This paper gives an account of our early institutional experience with adoption of robotic colorectal surgery using structured training. Analysis was conducted of a prospectively maintained database of our first 55 consecutive robotic colorectal cases, performed by four colorectal surgeons, each at the beginning of his robotic surgery experience, using the Da Vinci Si® system and undergoing training as per the European Academy of Robotic Colorectal Surgery (EARCS) programme. Overall surgical and oncological outcomes were interrogated. Fifty-five patients underwent robotic surgery between January 2017 and January 2018, M:F 34:21, median age (range) 60 (35–87) years. Thirty-three patients had colorectal cancer and 22 had benign pathologies. Eleven rectal cancer patients had neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. BMI was > 30 in 21.8% of patients and 56.4% of patients had previous abdominal surgery. Operative procedures performed were low anterior resection (n = 19), sigmoid colectomy (n = 9), right colectomy (n = 22), ventral mesh rectopexy (n = 3), abdominoperineal resection (n = 1) and reversal of Hartmann’s procedure (n = 1). Median blood loss was 40 ml (range 0–400). Mean operative time (minutes) was 233 (SD 79) for right colectomy and 368 (SD 105) for anterior resection. Median length of hospital stay was 6 days (IQR 5–7). There was no 30-day mortality, intraoperative complications, conversion to laparoscopic or open, or anastomotic leakage. Median lymph nodes harvest was 15 in non-neoadjuvant cases (range 7–23) and 8 in neoadjuvant cases (2–14). Our early results demonstrate that colorectal robotic surgery can be adopted safely for both benign and neoplastic conditions using a structured training programme without compromising clinical or oncological outcomes. The early learning curve can be time intensive.

Keywords

Robotic surgery Colorectal surgery Da Vinci Si Colorectal cancer 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Mohammed Aradaib, Paul Neary, Adnan Hafeez, Reza Kalbassi and Diarmuid O’Riordain declare that they have no conflict of interest. Professor Amjad Parvaiz is a proctor for the European Academy of Robotic Colorectal Surgery which is funded by Intuitive Surgical.

References

  1. 1.
    Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–664.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS et al (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    EH A (2009) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91:541–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stephen M. Kavic SMK (2002) Adhesions and adhesiolysis: the role of laparoscopy. JSLS 66:99–109Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moran DC, Kavanagh DO, Nugent E et al (2011) Laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer: evaluation of oncological efficacy. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:1143–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1221-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y et al (2012) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer 3:49–57.  https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.3621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tjandra JJCMK (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and recto-sigmoid cancer. Color Dis 8:375–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maggiori LPY (2013) Is it time for a paradigm shift: laparoscopy is now the best approach for rectal cancer? Transl Gastrointest Cancer 3(1):1–3Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Good DW, O’Riordan JM, Moran D et al (2011) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-centre experience of 120 cases. Int J Color Dis 26:1309–1315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1261-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abu Gazala M, Wexner SD (2017) Re-appraisal and consideration of minimally invasive surgery in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep 5:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gox001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee SW (2009) Laparoscopic procedures for colon and rectal cancer surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 22:218–224.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1242461 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shearer R, Aly OE, Aly EHGM (2013) Have early post-operative complications from laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery improved over the past 20 years? Color Dis 15:1211–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cecil TD, Taffinder​ N, Gudgeon AM (2006) A personal view on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Color Dis 8:30–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1633–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ballantyne GHMF (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin N Am 83:1293–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    SH B (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery. Yonsei Med J 49:891–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A et al (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1686–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    EARCS Training curriculum for robotic colon and rectal surgery. https://earcs.pt/index.php/curriculum. Accessed Apr 2018
  21. 21.
    Al Asari S, Min BS (2012) Robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Surgery.  https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/293894 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Crawford DL (2006) Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20:1713–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kariv Y, Delaney CP (2005) Robotics in colorectal surgery. Minerva Chir 60:401–416Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xu H, Li J, Sun Y et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 12:274.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sun Y, Xu H, Li Z, Han J, Song W, Wang J, Xu Z (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 14:61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fielding GA, Lumley J, Nathanson L et al (1997) Laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 11:745–749.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sunu PV, Mittal NJ (2017) Outcomes after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy and open colectomy when compared by operative duration for the procedure. Am J Surg 215(4):577–580.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.04.020 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beacon HospitalDublin 18Republic of Ireland
  2. 2.European Academy of Robotic Colorectal SurgeryChampalimaud FoundationLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations