Abstract
This study aimed at reporting our first experience with robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy (R-LESS-RP) with single-site VesPa platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc.). A 68-year-old-man presenting with a cT1c adenocarcinoma Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 in 4/12 bilateral cores underwent a transperitoneal robotic LESS-RP with a single-site Vespa platform. Initial PSA, prostate weight, and body mass index (BMI) were 4.4 ng/ml, 45 g, and 25, respectively. Instruments and camera cross within the Single-Site port; the da Vinci System software detects and reassigns the user's hands with the instruments position. The single-site port is inserted through a 2-cm intraumbilical incision. The robotic 8.5 mm scope and two surgical curved instruments (fenestrated bipolar forceps and cautery hook) are introduced through the ports and used for most of the procedure, whereas a wristed needle driver on the right hand is used for the reconstructive steps. An additional 12 mm port (Air Seal, SurgiQuest) is placed in a midline between the umbilicus and the right iliac spine in order to facilitate table assistance during surgery and to place a drain at the end of the procedure.
Operative time and blood loss were 300 min and 400 mL, respectively. The postoperative course was uneventful. The drain and the catheter were removed on days 1 and 6, respectively. The patient experienced a temporary mild stress incontinence (one pad at sixth month) and erectile dysfunction.
Our first robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy (R-LESS-RP) with the single-site VesPa platform was associated with acceptable operative times and perioperative outcome. This procedure is feasible without complications, provided that a proper patient selection has occurred. Limited movements together with the lack of the fourth robotic arm require a considerable expertise in robotic surgery. Some tricks can help overcome technical limitations. The Robotic LESS-RP reduces in some measure the limitations of conventional LESS RP, although further refinement of the robotic instruments is necessary.
References
Martín OD, Azhar RA, Clavijo R et al (2016) Single port radical prostatectomy: current status. J Robot Surg 10(2):87–95
Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK et al (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71:3–6
Gettman MT, Box G, Averch T et al (2008) Consensus statement on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: heralding a new era in urology? Eur Urol 53:1117–1120
Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M et al (2008) Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int 101:83–88
White WM, Haber GP, Goel RK et al (2009) Single-port urological surgery: single-center experience with the first 100 cases. Urology 74:801–804
Desai MM, Berger AK, Brandina R et al (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site surgery: initial hundred patients. Urology 74:805–813
Ferrara V, Giannubilo W, Azizi B, Vecchioli C, Garritano A (2010) SILS extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Minerva Urol Nefrol Ital J Urol Nephrol 62(4):363–369
White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R, Khanna R, Forest S, Yang B et al (2010) Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy: technique and early outcomes. Eur Urol 58(4):544–550
Stein RJ, White WM, Goel RK, Irwin BH, Haber GP, Kaouk JH (2010) Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using GelPort as the access platform. Eur Urol 57:132–137
Caceres F, Cabrera PM, Garcia-Tello A, Garcia-Mediero JM, Angulo JC (2012) Safety study of umbilical single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a new DuoRotate system. Eur Urol 62(6):1143–1149
Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP et al (2009) Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report. BJU Int 103:366–369
Barret E, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Galiano M, Vallancien G (2009) Re: initial complete laparoendoscopic single-site surgery robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (LESS-RARP). Int Braz J Urol 35:92–93
Canes D, Berger A, Aron M et al (2010) Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 57:95–101
Park YH, Park JH, Jeong CW, Kim HH (2010) Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy with conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol 24:997–1003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Mattevi D, Luciani LG, Vattovani V, Chiodini S, Puglisi M, Malossini G, declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mattevi, D., Luciani, L.G., Vattovani, V. et al. First case of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy with single-site VesPa platform. J Robotic Surg 12, 381–385 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0724-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0724-y