Prospective assessment of positioning-related pain in robotic urologic surgery
This was a prospective study to assess positioning-related pain in 20 awake volunteers in the dorsal lithotomy (DL) and lateral decubitus (LD) positions. Each volunteer was put through the series of discrete, sequential steps used to achieve a final position; each step had two options. The Wong-Baker scale (WB) was used to rate pain for each option and the preferred option and ad lib comments were recorded. We found that awake volunteers could clearly and immediately distinguish differences in pain levels between position options. For the DL position, volunteers favored having the arms slightly flexed and pronated as opposed to being straight and supinated reflected by statistically less painful WB scores and option preference. Volunteers preferred having the neck flexed as opposed to being flat. For the LD position, volunteers reported statistically lower pain scores and preference for a foam roll for axilla support as opposed to a rolled blanket, the table flexed without the kidney rest as opposed to a raised kidney rest, and the over arm board as oppose to stacked blankets for contralateral arm support. Ad lib comments from the volunteers supported the above findings. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to demonstrate objective preferences for variations in surgical positioning using awake volunteers. This exercise with awake volunteers resulted in immediate changes in positioning for real robotic surgery patients in our practice.
KeywordsPatient positioning Patient safety Neuromuscular injuries Robotic surgery Dorsal lithotomy Lateral decubitus
Contralateral arm support
Securing the body
Supporting the legs
KBG, KP, and CH performed the research, ML and MLC designed the research study, KBG analyzed the data, KBG and MLC wrote the manuscript. All authors have revised the manuscript critically and approve of the final version.
Compliance with ethical standards
Source of funding
Conflict of interest
All authors, KBG, KP, CH, ML, and MLC declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 13.American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Prevention of Perioperative Peripheral Neuropathies (2011) Practice advisory for the prevention of perioperative peripheral neuropathies: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on prevention of perioperative peripheral neuropathies. Anesthesiology 114(4):741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Hagberg CA, Welch WC, Bowman-Howard ML (1997) Anesthesia and surgery for spine and spinal cord procedures. Textbook of neuroanesthesia: with neurosurgical and neuroscience perspectives. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 15.Wong D (1995) Reference manual for the Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale. Mayday Pain Resource Center, DuarteGoogle Scholar