Abstract
While robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is an effective treatment for localized prostate cancer, the risk of complications in older patients can be a deterrent to surgery. We evaluated the rate of medical complications following RALRP in a national dataset of safety events, and assessed whether age is an independent risk factor for these complications. Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing RALRP between 2009 and 2012 in the prospectively maintained American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) database was performed. Demographic and comorbid data were collated, medical complications occurring during the 30-day post-operative period were identified. We identified age-related comorbidities, and complications associated with these comorbidities. A binary logistic regression model with age and age-related comorbidities as predictors and specific complication as outcome, was used to evaluate whether age is an independent risk factor for these complications. 12,123 patients underwent RALRP between 2009 and 2012, with a mean age of 62 (22–92). Post-operative medical complications included urinary tract infection (UTI) (1.77 %), deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (0.67 %), pulmonary embolism (PE) (0.45 %), pneumonia (PNA) (0.27 %), myocardial infarction (MI) (0.12 %), and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (0.01 %). Nine comorbidities were positively correlated with age (p < 0.05). Four medical complications were associated with these age-related comorbidities: MI, CVA, PNA, and UTI. On multivariate analysis, age was an independent risk factor for post-operative PNA (p < 0.05), but not for MI (p = 0.09), UTI (p = 0.3) or CVA (p = 0.2). Patient age was independently associated with post-operative pneumonia only. These data suggest that RALRP can be considered as a treatment option in selected older patients with minimal increased risk for post-operative complications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Bianchi M, Jeong W, Shariat SF, Hansen J, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Rogers CG, Peabody JO, Montorsi F, Menon M, Karakiewicz PI (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 61(4):679–685. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027
Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, Barry MJ, Aronson WJ, Fox S, Gingrich JR, Wei JT, Gilhooly P, Grob BM, Nsouli I, Iyer P, Cartagena R, Snider G, Roehrborn C, R Sharifi, Blank W, Pandya P, Andriole GL, Culkin D, Wheeler T, Prostate Cancer Intervention versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) Study Group (2012) Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 367(3):203–213. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113162
Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, Garmo H, Stark JR, Busch C, Nordling S, Häggman M, Andersson SO, Bratell S, Spångberg A, Palmgren J, Steineck G, Adami HO, Johansson JE, SPCG-4 Investigators (2011) Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364(18):1708–1717. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1011967
Froehner M, Novotny V, Koch R, Leike S, Twelker L, Wirth MP (2013) Perioperative complications after radical prostatectomy: open versus robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Urol Int 90(3):312–315. doi:10.1159/000345323
Liu JJ, Maxwell BG, Panousis P, Chung BI (2013) Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the national surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) database. Urology 82(3):579–583. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.080
Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Shariat SF, Stolzenburg JU, Van Poppel H, Zattoni F, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Wilson TG (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):431–452. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044
Froehner M, Koch R, Litz RJ, Hakenberg OW, Oehlschlaeger S, Wirth MP (2010) Survival analysis in men undergoing radical prostatectomy at an age of 70 years or older. Urol Oncol 28(6):628–634. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.10.025
Ramírez-Backhaus M, Rubio-Briones J, Collado A, Casanova J, Gómez-Ferrer A, Domínguez J, Ricos JV, Monros JL, Iborra I, Solsona E (2014) Radical prostatectomy is a reasonable treatment for patients over 70 years of age. Actas Urol Esp 38(1):21–27. doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2013.02.011
Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Carroll PR (2010) Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(7):1117–1123. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.26.0133
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Lawrence M. Dagrosa, Johann P. Ingimarsson, Ivan P. Gorlov, John H. Higgins and Elias S. Hyams declare that they have no conflict of interest report.
Ethical standards
The study was deemed exempt from institutional review board by the Dartmouth College Committee for Protection of Human Subjects due to the de-identified nature of the ACS-NSQIP data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dagrosa, L.M., Ingimarsson, J.P., Gorlov, I.P. et al. Is age an independent risk factor for medical complications following minimally invasive radical prostatectomy? An evaluation of contemporary American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) data. J Robotic Surg 10, 343–346 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0605-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0605-9