Skip to main content
Log in

The interval robotic transabdominal cerclage in a morbidly obese patient

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most commonly used prophylactic treatment of cervical insufficiency is cerclage but it carries significant morbidity either through vaginal or abdominal approach. A robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage (RoboTAC) placement as an interval procedure could offer advantages over the conventional laparoscopic approach especially in morbidly obese patients. We report the use of interval RoboTAC procedure in a morbidly obese patient and ultimately she delivered a healthy infant at 38 weeks 2 days nonetheless removal of the cerclage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2014) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol 123(2 Pt 1):372

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Fadhli R, Tulandi T (2004) Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 31:497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burger NB, Brölmann HAM, Einarsson JI, Langebrekke A, Huirne JAF (2011) Effectiveness of abdominal cerclage placed via laparotomy or laparoscopy: systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(6):696–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barmat L, Glaser G, Davis G, Craparo F (2007) Da Vinci-assisted abdominal cerclage. Fertil Steril 88(5):1437-e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Iams JD (2009) Cervical insufficiency. Creasy and Resnik maternal-fetal medicine, 6th edn. Saunders and Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 583–595

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Roberts D, Jorgensen AL (2012) Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD008991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Witt MU, Joy SD, Clark J, Herring A, Bowes WA, Thorp JM (2009) Cervicoisthmic cerclage: transabdominal vs transvaginal approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:105.e1–105.e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tulandi T, Alghanaim N, Hakeem G, Tan X (2014) Pre and post-conceptional abdominal cerclage by laparoscopy or laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(6):987–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fechner AJ, Alvarez M, Smith DH, Al-Khan A (2008) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cerclage in a pregnant patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(2):e10–e11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore ES, Foster TL, McHugh K, Addleman RN, Sumner JE (2012) Robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage (RoboTAC) in the non-pregnant patient. J Obstet Gynaecol 32(7):643–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Nashar SA, Paraiso MF, Rodewald K, Muir T, Abdelhafez F, Lazebnik N, Bedaiwy MA (2013) Laparoscopic cervicoisthmic cerclage: technique and systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest 75(1):1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berghella V, Szychowski JM, Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, Sheffield JS et al (2012) Suture type and ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy. Vaginal Ultrasound Trial Consortium. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:2287–2290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM et al (2011) Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 117:663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolfe L, DePasquale S, Adair CD, Torres C, Stallings S, Briery C et al (2008) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic placement of transabdominal cerclage during pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 25:653–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selim Afşar.

Ethics declarations

The Institutional Review Board of Acıbadem University does not require approval for this case report because it describes a standard surgical procedure.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent section

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case Report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case Report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Financial disclosure

The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Güngör, M., Afşar, S., Özbaşlı, E. et al. The interval robotic transabdominal cerclage in a morbidly obese patient. J Robotic Surg 10, 69–72 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0543-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0543-y

Keywords

Navigation