Skip to main content
Log in

Robotic-assisted radical parametrectomy in patients with malignant gynecological tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe the operative technique of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical parametrectomy and analyze perioperative data including adequacy of resections, pathology, and complications in our initial cases. A retrospective study was performed of seven patients with gynecological cancers involving the cervix who had previously been treated with simple hysterectomies and then underwent robotic-assisted radical parametrectomies. Pathology from the initial hysterectomies and the radical parametrectomies was reviewed. Postoperative complications, operative times, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were assessed. The upper part of the vagina, parametrial tissue, and bilateral pelvic lymph nodes of all seven patients who had undergone a previous simple hysterectomy were removed. The mean age was 56.4 (SD ± 10.7) years. Diagnoses from hysterectomy specimens were invasive squamous carcinoma (n = 4), endometrial adenocarcinoma (n = 2), and clear-cell papillary adenocystic cervical carcinoma (n = 1). The median number of lymph nodes removed was 8 (min 4, max 29), and one patient had nodal metastasis. The mean operative time was 228.6 (SD ± 38.9) min, estimated blood loss was 147 (SD ± 58.2) ml, and length of hospital stay was five (SD ± 2.3) days. One intraoperative complication (cystotomy) occurred and was successfully repaired. One postoperative fistula developed on postoperative day 10. This early experience demonstrates that the basic surgical and anatomical principles of radical parametrectomy can be applied to robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Genitourinary fistulae are always a concern with this procedure, and minimization of electrocautery near the bladder and ureters may further reduce complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP (1974) Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 44:265–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zapardiel I, Zanagnolo V, Magrina JF, Magtibay PM (2010) Robotic radical parametrectomy in benign disease: report of two cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89:1108–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Orr JW Jr, Ball GC, Soong SJ, Hatch KD, Partridge EF, Austin JM (1986) Surgical treatment of women found to have invasive cervix cancer at the time of total hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 68:353–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayhan A, Kucukoskan T, Tuncel ZS (1992) Management of invasive cervical cancer in patients initially initially treated by simple hysterectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 18:177–179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujii S (2008) Anatomic identification of nerve-sparing hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure. Gynecol Oncol 111:S33–S41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Charoenkwan K, Srisomboon J, Suprasert P, Tantipalakorn C, Kietpeerakool C (2006) Nerve-sparing class III radical hysterectomy: a modified technique to spare the pelvic autonomic nerves without compromising radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:1705–1712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Magrina JF, Walter AJ, Schild SE (1999) Laparoscopic radical parametrectomy and pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy for vaginal carcinoma: a case report. Gynecol Oncol 75(3):514–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang Z, Xu H, Chen Y, Li Y, Chang Q, Shi C (2006) Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy or parametrectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for cervical or vaginal stump carcinoma: report of six cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16(4):1713–1716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleisch MC, Hatch KD (2005) Laparoscopic assisted parametrectomy/upper vaginectomy (LPUV)—technique, applications and results. Gynecol Oncol 98:420–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Magrina JF, Magtibay PM (2012) Robotic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy: feasibility and technique. Int J Med Robot 8:206–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Nishikawa Y, Nakajima T (2000) Radical hysterectomy: an anatomic evaluation of parametrial dissection. Gynecol Oncol 77:155–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Satou N (1996) A new proposal for radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 62:370–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wrihght JD, Grigsly PM (2007) Utility of parametrectomy for early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer 110:1281–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, Schneider A (2000) Identification and preservation of the motoric inervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol 79:154–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Benedetti-Panici P, Koehler C, Raspagliest F, Querleu D, Morrow CP (2011) New classification system of radical hysterectomy: emphasis on a three-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection. Gynecol Oncol 122:264–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee CL, Huang KG, Wang CJ, Yen CF, Soong YK (2000) Radical laparoscopic surgery for carcinoma of the cervical stump. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 7(2):241–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Köhler C, Tozzi R, Klemm P, Schneider A (2003) “Schauta sine utero”: technique and results of laparoscopic-vaginal radical parametrectomy. Gynecol Oncol 91(2):359–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Wolf JK, Brown J, Soliman PT (2008) Robotic radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111:18–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vitobello D, Siesto G, Bulletti C, Accardi A, Iedà N (2012) Robotic radical parametrectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our experience and review of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:548–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Holloway RW, Ahmad S (2012) Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 38:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frey MK, Worley MJ Jr, Slomovitz BM (2011) Robotic radical parametrectomy for unstaged invasive endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 115(2):208–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Magrina JF, Zanagnolo VL (2008) Robotic surgery for cervical cancer. Yonsei Med J 49(6):879–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Persson J, Kannisto P, Bossmar T (2008) Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 111(3):564–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shafer A, Boggess JF (2008) Robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging and radical hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system. Gynecol Oncol 111(2 Suppl):S18–S23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. National Health Insurance Fund of Bulgaria. http://www.nhif.bg/web/guest/170. Accessed 11 Nov 2012

Download references

Conflict of interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grigor A. Gorchev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorchev, G.A., Tomov, S.T., Radionova, Z.V. et al. Robotic-assisted radical parametrectomy in patients with malignant gynecological tumors. J Robotic Surg 7, 317–323 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-012-0387-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-012-0387-7

Keywords

Navigation