Skip to main content

History of robotic surgery

Abstract

Robotic surgery is one of the most advanced forms of Minimally Invasive Surgery. Although the application of robotic technology to surgical robotics started some 20 years ago, the earliest work in robotics and automation can be traced back to 400 BC. Some of the early pioneers include Archytas of Arentum, Leonardo da Vinci, Gianello Toriano, and Pierre Jaquet-Droz, and we owe to these philosophers and scientists the fact that we can offer the benefit of minimal invasion in surgery. The purpose of this review is to give a brief description of the evolution of robotic surgery from its early history to present-day surgical robotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Asimov I (1950) I, Robot. Fawcett, Greenwich, CT

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Asimov I (1942) Runaround. In: Astounding science fiction. Street & Smith Publications Inc., New York

  3. 3.

    Patel V (2005) Robot-assisted laparascopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology 66:45–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    García-Diego JA (1982) Los relojes y autómatas de Juanelo Turriano. Monografías Españolas de Relojería, Tempvs Fvgit, Madrid, pp LV–LX, figs 6.3–6.9

  5. 5.

    Patel V (ed) (2007) Robotic urologic surgery, 1st edn. Springer, London, p 2

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonekheere EA, Hayall S (1988) A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35:153

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Davies B (1988) A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng 35:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Coptcoat MJ, Wickman JEA (1989) A surgeon robot prostatectomy—a laboratory evaluation. J Med Eng Technol 13:273–277

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B et al (1992) Development of a surgical robot for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 285:57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bann S, Khan M, Hernandez J et al (2003) Robotics in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 196:784–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Robodoc. CUREXO technology. http://www.robodoc.com/about.html. Accessed 23 May 2010

  12. 12.

    Unger SW, Unger HM, Bass RT (1994) AESOP robotic arm. Surg Endosc 8:1131

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sackier JM, Wang Y (1994) Robotically assisted laparascopic surgery: from concept to development. Surg Endosc 8:63–66

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jacobs LK, Shayani V, Sackier JM (1997) Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 11:54–55

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Johanet H (1998) Voice-controlled robot: new surgical aide? Thoughts of a user. Ann Chir 52:918–921

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Allaf ME, Jackman SV, Schulam PG, Cadeddu JA, Lee BR, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1998) Laparoscopic visual field: voice vs foot pedal interfaces for control of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 12:1415–1418

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Partin AW, Adams JB, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1995) Complete robot-assisted laparascopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 181:552–557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW (1995) Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 154:2134–2146

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W (1998) One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynecological endoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod 13:2748–2750

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Geis WP, Kim HC, Brennan EJ Jr, McAfee PC, Wang Y (1996) Robotic arm enhancement to accomodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimially invasive surgery procedures. Stud Health Technol Inform 29:471–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hubens G, Ysebaert D, Vaneerdewerg W, Chapelle T, Eyskens E (1999) Laparascopic adrenalectomy with the aid of the AESOP 2000 robot. Acta Chir 99:125–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Piazza L, Caragliano P, Scardilli M, Sgroi AV, Marino G, Giannone G (1999) Laparascopic robot-assisted adrenalectomy and left ovariectomy (case reports). Chir Ital 51:456–466

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ballantyne GH, Merola P, Weber A, Wasielewski A (2001) Robotic solutions to the pitfalls of laparascopic colectomy. Osp Ital Chir 7:405–412

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rininsland HH (1993) Basics of robotics and manipulators in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg 1:154–159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kiaii B, Boyd WD, Rayman R, Dobkowski WB, Ganapathy S, Jablonsky G, Novick RJ (2000) Robot-assisted computer enhanced closed-chest coronary surgery: preliminary experience using a harmonic scalpel and Zeus. Heart Surg Forum 3:194–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Boyd WD, Kiaii B, Novick RJ, Rayman R, Ganapathy S, Dobkowski WB, Jablonsky G, McKenzie FN, Menkis AH (2001) RAVECAB: improving outcome in off-pump minimal access surgery with robotic assistance and video enhancement. Can J Surg 44:45–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Reichenspurner H, Damiano RJ, Mack M, Boehn DH, Gulbins H, Detter C, Meiser B, Ellgass R, Reichart B (1999) Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 118:11–16

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Gulbins H, Detter C, Miser B, Brenner P, Habazettl H, Reichart B (1999) Early experience with robotic technology for coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1542–1546

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Detter C, Arnold M, Gulbins H, Miser B, Reichart B (2000) Clinical use of a computer-enhanced surgical robot system for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 48:198–202

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Boyd WD, Rayman R, Desai ND, Menkis AH, Dobkowski W, Ganapathy S, Jablonsky G, McKenzie FN, Novick RJ (2000) Closed-chest coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart with the use of computer-enhanced surgical robotic system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:807–809

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–380

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Satava RM (2002) Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(1):6–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gyung TS, Gill IS (2001) Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology 58:893–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    PUMA 500. http://www.alaska.edu/uaf/cem/ece/remote-robotics/image007.jpg. Last accessed 15 Jan 2010

  35. 35.

    Otero JR (romerooi@mskcc.org), Poporel P, Atreya D, Touijer K, Guillonneau B (2007) Archivos Espanoles de Urologia 60(4): 335–341

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanket Chauhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalan, S., Chauhan, S., Coelho, R.F. et al. History of robotic surgery. J Robotic Surg 4, 141–147 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-010-0202-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • History of robotics
  • Unimate
  • PROBOT
  • ROBODOC
  • ZEUS
  • AESOP