Advertisement

Journal of Robotic Surgery

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 141–147 | Cite as

History of robotic surgery

  • Satyam Kalan
  • Sanket ChauhanEmail author
  • Rafael F. Coelho
  • Marcelo A. Orvieto
  • Ignacio R. Camacho
  • Kenneth J. Palmer
  • Vipul R. Patel
Review Article

Abstract

Robotic surgery is one of the most advanced forms of Minimally Invasive Surgery. Although the application of robotic technology to surgical robotics started some 20 years ago, the earliest work in robotics and automation can be traced back to 400 BC. Some of the early pioneers include Archytas of Arentum, Leonardo da Vinci, Gianello Toriano, and Pierre Jaquet-Droz, and we owe to these philosophers and scientists the fact that we can offer the benefit of minimal invasion in surgery. The purpose of this review is to give a brief description of the evolution of robotic surgery from its early history to present-day surgical robotics.

Keywords

History of robotics Unimate PROBOT ROBODOC ZEUS AESOP 

References

  1. 1.
    Asimov I (1950) I, Robot. Fawcett, Greenwich, CTGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asimov I (1942) Runaround. In: Astounding science fiction. Street & Smith Publications Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patel V (2005) Robot-assisted laparascopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology 66:45–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    García-Diego JA (1982) Los relojes y autómatas de Juanelo Turriano. Monografías Españolas de Relojería, Tempvs Fvgit, Madrid, pp LV–LX, figs 6.3–6.9Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patel V (ed) (2007) Robotic urologic surgery, 1st edn. Springer, London, p 2Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonekheere EA, Hayall S (1988) A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35:153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davies B (1988) A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng 35:153–160Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Coptcoat MJ, Wickman JEA (1989) A surgeon robot prostatectomy—a laboratory evaluation. J Med Eng Technol 13:273–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B et al (1992) Development of a surgical robot for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 285:57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bann S, Khan M, Hernandez J et al (2003) Robotics in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 196:784–795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robodoc. CUREXO technology. http://www.robodoc.com/about.html. Accessed 23 May 2010
  12. 12.
    Unger SW, Unger HM, Bass RT (1994) AESOP robotic arm. Surg Endosc 8:1131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sackier JM, Wang Y (1994) Robotically assisted laparascopic surgery: from concept to development. Surg Endosc 8:63–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jacobs LK, Shayani V, Sackier JM (1997) Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 11:54–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johanet H (1998) Voice-controlled robot: new surgical aide? Thoughts of a user. Ann Chir 52:918–921PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Allaf ME, Jackman SV, Schulam PG, Cadeddu JA, Lee BR, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1998) Laparoscopic visual field: voice vs foot pedal interfaces for control of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 12:1415–1418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Partin AW, Adams JB, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1995) Complete robot-assisted laparascopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 181:552–557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW (1995) Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 154:2134–2146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W (1998) One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynecological endoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod 13:2748–2750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Geis WP, Kim HC, Brennan EJ Jr, McAfee PC, Wang Y (1996) Robotic arm enhancement to accomodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimially invasive surgery procedures. Stud Health Technol Inform 29:471–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hubens G, Ysebaert D, Vaneerdewerg W, Chapelle T, Eyskens E (1999) Laparascopic adrenalectomy with the aid of the AESOP 2000 robot. Acta Chir 99:125–127Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Piazza L, Caragliano P, Scardilli M, Sgroi AV, Marino G, Giannone G (1999) Laparascopic robot-assisted adrenalectomy and left ovariectomy (case reports). Chir Ital 51:456–466Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ballantyne GH, Merola P, Weber A, Wasielewski A (2001) Robotic solutions to the pitfalls of laparascopic colectomy. Osp Ital Chir 7:405–412Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rininsland HH (1993) Basics of robotics and manipulators in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg 1:154–159Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kiaii B, Boyd WD, Rayman R, Dobkowski WB, Ganapathy S, Jablonsky G, Novick RJ (2000) Robot-assisted computer enhanced closed-chest coronary surgery: preliminary experience using a harmonic scalpel and Zeus. Heart Surg Forum 3:194–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boyd WD, Kiaii B, Novick RJ, Rayman R, Ganapathy S, Dobkowski WB, Jablonsky G, McKenzie FN, Menkis AH (2001) RAVECAB: improving outcome in off-pump minimal access surgery with robotic assistance and video enhancement. Can J Surg 44:45–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reichenspurner H, Damiano RJ, Mack M, Boehn DH, Gulbins H, Detter C, Meiser B, Ellgass R, Reichart B (1999) Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 118:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Gulbins H, Detter C, Miser B, Brenner P, Habazettl H, Reichart B (1999) Early experience with robotic technology for coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1542–1546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Detter C, Arnold M, Gulbins H, Miser B, Reichart B (2000) Clinical use of a computer-enhanced surgical robot system for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 48:198–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boyd WD, Rayman R, Desai ND, Menkis AH, Dobkowski W, Ganapathy S, Jablonsky G, McKenzie FN, Novick RJ (2000) Closed-chest coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart with the use of computer-enhanced surgical robotic system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:807–809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Satava RM (2002) Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(1):6–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gyung TS, Gill IS (2001) Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology 58:893–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
    Otero JR (romerooi@mskcc.org), Poporel P, Atreya D, Touijer K, Guillonneau B (2007) Archivos Espanoles de Urologia 60(4): 335–341Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satyam Kalan
    • 1
  • Sanket Chauhan
    • 2
    Email author
  • Rafael F. Coelho
    • 2
  • Marcelo A. Orvieto
    • 2
  • Ignacio R. Camacho
    • 2
  • Kenneth J. Palmer
    • 2
  • Vipul R. Patel
    • 2
  1. 1.Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital Celebration HealthUniversity of South Florida College of MedicineTampaUSA
  2. 2.Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital Celebration HealthUniversity of Central Florida College of MedicineOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations