Journal of Robotic Surgery

, 3:141 | Cite as

Robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women

  • Sonia A. Rebeles
  • Howard G. Muntz
  • Carrie Wieneke-Broghammer
  • Emily S. Vason
  • Kathryn F. McGonigleEmail author
Original Article


Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in obese patients is challenging. We sought to evaluate whether total laparoscopic hysterectomies using the da Vinci robotic system in obese patients, in comparison with non-obese patients, is a reasonable surgical approach. One-hundred consecutive robot-assisted TLHs were performed over a 17-month period. Obesity was not a contraindication to robotic surgery, assuming adequate respiratory function to tolerate Trendelenburg position and, for cancer cases, a small enough uterus to allow vaginal extraction without morcellation. Data were prospectively collected on patient characteristics, total operative time, hysterectomy time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and complications. Outcomes with non-obese and obese women were compared. The median age, weight, and BMI of the 100 patients who underwent robot-assisted TLH was 57.6 years (30.0–90.6), 82.1 kg (51.9–159.6), and 30.2 kg/m2 (19.3–60.2), respectively. Fifty (50%) patients were obese (BMI ≥ 30); 22 patients were morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40). There was no increase in complications (p = 0.56) or blood loss (p = 0.44) with increasing BMI. While increased BMI was associated with longer operative times (p = 0.05), median time increased by only 36 min when comparing non-obese and morbidly obese patients. Median length of stay was one day for all weight categories (p = 0.42). Robot-assisted TLH is feasible and can be safely performed in obese patients. More data are needed to compare robot-assisted TLH with other hysterectomy techniques in obese patients. Nonetheless, our results are encouraging. Robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy may be the preferred technique for appropriately selected obese patients.


Robotics Obesity Obese Hysterectomy Robot-assisted surgery Laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy Total laparoscopic hysterectomy 



Statistical analysis was performed by Vanessa Bolejack, MPH, Cancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, WA, USA.


  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hysterectomy in the United States, 2000–2004, Last accessed online 4/27/2009
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization (2000) (PDF). Technical report series 894: Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organization, Geneva. Last accessed online 4/27/2009Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, McDowell MA, Flegal KM (2007) Obesity among adults in the United States—no change since 2003–2004. NCHS data brief no 1. National Center for Health Statistics, HyattsvilleGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Overweight and obesity. CDC, Atlanta. Available at: Last accessed online 4/27/2009
  5. 5.
    Ghezzi F, Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Bergamini V, Uccella S, Beretta P, Franchi M, Bolis P (2006) Laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer in nonobese and obese women: a consecutive series. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13:269–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pitkin RM (1976) Abdominal hysterectomy in obese women. Surg Gynecol Obstet 142(4):532–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pitkin RM (1977) Vaginal hysterectomy in obese women. Obstet Gynecol 49(5):567–569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perlow JH, Morgan MA (1994) Massive maternal obesity and perioperative cesarean morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Cancer Society (2008) Cancer Facts & Figures 2008. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wynder EL, Escher GC, Mantel N (1966) An epidemiological investigation of cancer of the endometrium. Cancer 19(4):489–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eltabbakh GH, Shamonki MI, Moody JM, Lee Garafano L (2000) Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy? Gynecol Oncol 78:329–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Obermair A, Manolitsas TP, Leung Y, Hammond IG, McCartney AJ (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu CK, Cutner A, Mould T, Olaitan A (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy as a primary surgical treatment for endometrial cancer in morbidly obese women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 112:115–117Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG (2007) Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 110(5):1091–1095PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 9:13–15Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fiorentino RP, Zepeda MA, Goldstein BH, John CR, Rettenmaier MA (2006) Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13:60–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Veljovich DS, Paley PJ, Drescher CW, Everett EN, Shah C, Peters WA (2008) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:679.e1–679.e9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boggess J, Gehrig P, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner E et al (2008) A comparative study of three surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer; robotic-assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:360.e1–360.e9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0, DCTD, NCI, NIH, DHHS 31 March 2003 (, Published date 9 August 2006
  20. 20.
    Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Gypen B, Van Tu T, Vaneerdeweg W (2008) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc 22:1690–1696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khaira HS, Bruyere F, O’Malley PJ, Peters JS, Costello AJ (2006) Does obesity influence the operative course or complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy? BJU Int 98(6):1275–1278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF (2007) Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:113.e1–113.e114 Erratum in: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(3):332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Childers JM, Brzechffa PR, Surwit EA (1993) Laparoscopy using the left upper quadrant as the primary trocar site. Gynecol Oncol 50(2):221–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rabl C, Palazzo F, Aoki H, Campos GM (2008) Initial laparoscopic access using an optical trocar without pneumoperitoneum is safe, effective in the morbidly obese. Surg Innov 15(2):126–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Visco AG, Advincula AP (2008) Robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1369–1384PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonia A. Rebeles
    • 1
    • 2
  • Howard G. Muntz
    • 1
  • Carrie Wieneke-Broghammer
    • 1
    • 3
  • Emily S. Vason
    • 1
  • Kathryn F. McGonigle
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Northwest Hospital and Medical CenterSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Minimally Invasive and Robotic SurgeryThe University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations