Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for kidney tumors has demonstrated durable oncologic and functional outcomes. The feasibility of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) has been demonstrated in several small, single-institution studies. We performed a large, multi-institutional analysis to determine early oncologic results and perioperative outcomes after RPN. Between October, 2002 and September, 2007, 148 patients underwent RPN at six different centers by nine different primary surgeons for localized renal tumors. Medical and operative records were reviewed for clinical characteristics, pathologic findings, and follow-up information. A total of 148 patients underwent RPN. Mean tumor size was 2.8 cm. Renal hilar clamping was utilized in 120 patients, with a mean warm ischemia time of 27.8 min. Positive surgical margins were identified in six patients (4%), of which two had cautery artifact obscuring the margin after off-clamp cautery excision and one underwent completion radical nephrectomy with no evidence of cancer. There is no evidence of tumor recurrence at mean follow-up of 7.2 months (range 2–54 months) overall, and mean follow-up of 18 months (range 12–23 months) for patients with positive surgical margin. Complications occurred in nine patients (6.1%), including hematoma requiring drainage (n = 1), prolonged ileus (n = 3), pulmonary embolus (n = 2), prolonged urine leak (n = 2), and rhabdomyolysis (n = 1). Two patients underwent open conversion for failure to progress, one patient with morbid obesity and one patient with adhesions from prior ureterolithotomy. Mean hospital stay was 1.9 days. In this multi-institutional series of surgeons beginning their initial experience in RPN, the procedure is a feasible option for minimally invasive, nephron-sparing surgery, with immediate oncologic results and perioperative outcomes comparable with more mature laparoscopic series.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Allaf ME, Bahrain SB, Rogers C et al (2004) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long-term oncological outcome. J Urol 172:871–873
Lane BR, Gill IS (2007) 5-Year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 177:70–74
Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al (2007) Comparison of 1800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 178(1):41–46
Caruso RP, Phillips CK, Kau E et al (2006) Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. J Urol 176:36–39
Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK et al (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 64:914–918
Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R et al (2007) Da vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 51:186–192
Phillips CK, Taneja SS, Stifelman MD (2005) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the NYU technique. J Endourol 19:441–445
Rogers CG, Singh A, Blatt AM et al (2008) Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol 53:514–523
Bhayani SB (2008) daVinci robotic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: an atlas of the four-arm technique. J Robot Surg 1:279–285
Badani KK, Muhletaler F, Fumo M et al (2008) Optimizing robotic renal surgery: the lateral camera port placement technique and current results. J Endourol 22(3):507–510
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rogers, C.G., Menon, M., Weise, E.S. et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis. J Robotic Surg 2, 141–143 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-008-0098-2
- Kidney cancer
- Partial nephrectomy