Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility and safety of robot-assisted salvage prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report a comparison of perioperative complications and pathologic outcomes in patients with locally radiorecurrent prostate cancer treated by open radical retropubic or robot-assisted prostatectomy. The results of our study demonstrate that both surgical approaches were feasible and safe without any significant perioperative complications (death, rectal injury) with comparable short-term outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shipley WU, Thames HD, Sandler HM et al (1999) Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional pooled analysis. JAMA 281:1598–1604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal PK, Sadetske N, Konety BR et al (2007) Treatment failure after primary and salvage therapy for prostate cancer. Cancer (in press)

  3. Nguyen PL, D’Amico AV, Lee AK et al (2007) Patient selection, cancer control, and complications after salvage local therapy for postradiation prostate-specific antigen failure. Cancer 11:1417–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M (2007) Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: Assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 110(9):1951–1957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SC, Herrell D, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS (2007) A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 178:2385–2390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M et al (2003) A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. Br J Urol 92:205–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vaidya A, Soloway MS (2000) Salvage radical prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: morbidity revisited. J Urol 164:1998–2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Bianco FJ, Diblasio CJ, Fearn PA, Eastham JA (2004) Morbidity and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. J Urol 172:2239–2243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanderson KM, Penson DF, Cai K, Groshen S, Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Skinner DG (2006) Salvage radical prostatectomy: quality of life outcomes and long-term oncological control of radiorecurrent prostate cancer. J Urol 176:2025–2032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers E, Ohori M, Kassabian VS, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT (1995) Salvage radical prostatectomy: outcome measured by serum prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol 153:104–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson JB (2007) Debate: open radical prostatectomy vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic. Urol Oncol 25:490–493

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon P. Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S.P., Hollenbeck, B.K., Parker, W.R. et al. Feasibility and safety of robot-assisted salvage prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy. J Robotic Surg 2, 81–83 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-008-0082-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-008-0082-x

Keywords

Navigation