Cancer of the prostate is the most common malignancy of the male genito-urinary tract. Although a number of treatment options are available for early prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy has provided the best opportunity for long-term cure.
Over the last decade, the technique of radical prostatectomy has evolved significantly as an increased understanding of prostate anatomy, improved technology and new techniques have refined the procedure. While outcomes have improved significantly, open surgical excision is still associated with certain inherent morbidities [1]. As such, patients and surgeons have explored less invasive surgical options.
One such option is robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). It was first reported in Germany in 2001 by Binder [2] and then refined in the USA by Menon et al. [3, 4]. During the last decade; robotic prostatectomy has become the backbone of robotic surgery in urology. Robotic prostatectomy is viewed as the most natural application, as the small-wristed instrumentation and the magnified three-dimensional view have provided significant advantages while working deep down in the pelvis.
Today, the most commonly used robotic system in the USA is the da Vinci Surgical System™ (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The da Vinci™ aids the performance of RALP for several reasons:
-
1.
Restoration of depth perception and improved vision due to 10× magnification and three-dimensional vision;
-
2.
Wristed miniature instrumentation with 7 degrees of surgical freedom;
-
3.
Tremor-filtering and scaling of movements, aiding in fine dissection and precise suturing;
-
4.
Intuitive finger-controlled movement;
-
5.
Reduced surgeon fatigue as a result of improved ergonomics and relaxed surgeon working position [5]. These advantages have significantly reduced the learning curve, allowing both experienced and inexperienced laparoscopic surgeons to perform the procedure [6].
In this article we outline The Ohio State University technique of robotic radical prostatectomy.
Our technique is based on standard laparoscopic [7] and robotic technique [3] described previously; however, our technique differs based on how we perform the dorsal vein stitch, the suspension stitch, early retrograde dissection of the neurovascular bundle and continuous anastomosis described by Van Velthoeven. This article is supported by an online video link on the website of the Journal of Robotic Surgery.