, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 181–195 | Cite as

The occupations of slaves sold in New Orleans: Missing values, cheap talk, or informative advertising?

  • Jonathan PritchettEmail author
  • Jessica Hayes
Original Paper


Although plantation records indicate that many slaves in the southern USA were artisans and craftsmen, relatively few slaves were recorded as such on the New Orleans sales invoices. Fogel (Without consent or contract: the rise and fall of American slavery. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1989, p. 57, 162) assumes that the slaves without recorded occupations were unskilled workers, concluding that skilled slaves were “less than half as likely to have been sold as were ordinary field hands.” Using data from New Orleans newspapers, we find that most sales advertisements include information about the slave’s occupation. A comparison of the advertisement with the corresponding sales invoice shows that the slave’s occupation was often omitted from the invoice. Because the slave’s market price should reflect all relevant information available at the time of sale, the informational value of the slave’s advertised occupation can be estimated using regression analysis. We find that the advertised occupation affected the slave’s market price, which suggests that newspaper advertisements were informative and not simply “cheap talk.”


Slavery Slave trade Occupations Human capital Advertisements 

JEL Classification

N31 R23 

Supplementary material

11698_2015_129_MOESM1_ESM.docx (39 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38 kb)


  1. Bancroft F (1931) Slave-trading in the old South. J. H. Furst Company, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  2. Baptist E (2014) The half has never been told: slavery and the making of American capitalism. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Calomiris C, Pritchett J (2013) Betting on secession: quantifying political events surrounding slavery and the civil war. NBER Working Paper 19625Google Scholar
  4. Choo E, Eid J (2008) Interregional price difference in the New Orleans auctions market for slaves. J Bus Econ Stat 26(4):486–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cochran WG (1970) Some effects of errors of measurement on multiple correlation. J Am Stat Assoc 65(329):22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dionne G, St-Amour P, Vencatachellum D (2009) Asymmetric information and adverse selection in mauritian slave auctions. Rev Econ Stud 76(4):1269–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fogel WR, Engerman SL (1976) The New Orleans slave sale sample, 1804–1862. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social ResearchGoogle Scholar
  8. Fogel WR (1989) Without consent or contract: the rise and fall of American slavery. W. W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Fogel WR, Engerman SL (1974) Time on the cross: the economics of American Negro slavery. Little, Brown and Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman G (1992) Sources of data on slave occupations: their uses and limitations. In: Fogel (ed) Without consent of contract: evidence and methods. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, pp 69–77Google Scholar
  11. Greenwald BC, Glasspiegel RR (1983) Adverse selection in the market for slaves: New Orleans, 1830–1860. Q J Econ 98(3):479–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kotlikoff LJ (1979) The structure of slave prices in New Orleans, 1804 to 1862. Econ Inq 17(4):496–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kotlikoff LJ (1992) Quantitative description of the New Orleans slave market, 1804 to 1862. In: Fogel, Engerman (eds) Without consent or contract: markets and production, technical papers, vol 1. W. W. Norton, New York, pp 31–53Google Scholar
  14. Levendis J (2007) Qualities and effective-quantities of slaves in New Orleans. Southwest Econ Rev 34(1):161–177Google Scholar
  15. Louisiana (1806) Acts, 1st Leg. New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  16. New Orleans Advertiser (1830) New Orleans, various issuesGoogle Scholar
  17. New Orleans Argus (1830) New Orleans, various issuesGoogle Scholar
  18. New Orleans Bee (1830) New Orleans, various issuesGoogle Scholar
  19. New Orleans Courier (1830) New Orleans, various issuesGoogle Scholar
  20. New Orleans Notarial Archives. Accessed 23 Oct 2010
  21. New Orleans Notarial Archives (NONA). New Orleans, LA., various volumesGoogle Scholar
  22. Olson JF (1992) The occupational structure of southern plantations during the late antebellum era. In: Fogel, Engerman (eds) Without consent or contract: markets and production, technical papers, vol 1. W. W. Norton, New York, pp 137–169Google Scholar
  23. Phillips UB (1918) American Negro slavery. D. Appleton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillips UB (1929) Life and labor in the Old South. Little, Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  25. Pritchett J, Chamberlain R (1993) Selection in the market for slaves: New Orleans, 1830–1860. Q J Econ 108(2):461–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pritchett J, Smith M (2013) Sequential sales as a test of adverse selection in the market for slaves. J Econ Hist 73(2):479–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruef M (2012) Constructing labor markets: the valuation of black labor in the U.S. South, 1831 to 1867. Am Sociol Rev 77(6):970–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schafer JK (1981) New Orleans slavery in 1850 as seen in advertisements. J South Hist 47(1):33–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations