Advertisement

Cliometrica

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 207–235 | Cite as

Tariffs and income: a time series analysis for 24 countries

  • Markus LampeEmail author
  • Paul Sharp
Original Paper

Abstract

We argue for a new approach to examining the relationship between tariffs and growth. We demonstrate that more can be learned from time series analyses of the experience of individual countries rather than the usual panel data approach, which imposes a causal relation and presents an average coefficient for all countries. Tentative initial results using simple two-variable cointegrated VAR models suggest considerable heterogeneity in the experiences of the countries we look at. For most, however, there was a negative relationship between tariffs and levels of income for both the pre- and post-Second World War periods. However, in the second half of the twentieth century, the causality ran from income to tariffs: that is, countries simply liberalized as they got richer. Policy decisions based on the usual panel approach might thus be very inappropriate for individual countries.

Keywords

Tariff/growth relationship Protectionism Trade liberalization Cointegrated VAR 

JEL Classification

F1 F4 N1 N7 O2 

References

  1. Ahmed N (2003) Trade liberalization and endogenous growth of manufacturing industries in Bangladesh: an empirical investigation. Appl Econ 35(3):305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed N, Dutta D (2004) Trade liberalization and industrial growth in Pakistan: a cointegration analysis. Appl Econ 36(13):1421–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aidt T, Jensen PS (2009) Tax structure, size of government, and the extension of the voting franchise in Western Europe, 1860–1938. Int Tax Public Financ 16:362–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen RC (2011) Global economic history. A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (OUP very short introductions, 282)Google Scholar
  5. Anderson JE, Neary JP (2005) Measuring the restrictiveness of international trade policy. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Athukorala P-Ch (2011) Trade liberalization and the poverty of nations: a review article. J Dev Stud 47(3):533–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Athukorala P-Ch, Chand S (2007) Tariff-growth nexus in the australian economy, 1870–2002: is there a paradox? Working Paper in Trade and Development, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University 2007–2008Google Scholar
  8. Bagchi AK (1976) De-industrialization in India in the nineteenth-century: some theoretical implications. J Dev Stud 12(2):135–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balachandran G (ed) (2005) India and the world economy, 1850–1950. Oxford University Press, New Delhi (Debates in Indian History and Society, 2)Google Scholar
  10. Barro RJ, Ursúa JF (2006) Macroeconomic crises since 1870. Brook Paper Econ Activ 2008(1):255–350. Online Appendix, http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/barro/data_sets_barro
  11. Baunsgaard Th, Keen M (2010) Tax revenue and (or?) trade liberalization. J Public Econ 94:563–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beason R, Weinstein DE (1996) Growth, economies of scale, and targeting in Japan (1955–1990). Rev Econ Stat 78(2):286–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhagwati J, Srinivasan TN (2001) Outward-orientation and development: are revisionists right? Outward-orientation and development: are revisionists right? In: Lal DK, Snape R (eds) Trade, development and political economy: essays in honor of Anne Krueger. Palgrave, London, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  14. Clemens MA, Williamson JG (2004) Why did the tariff-growth correlation reverse after 1950? J Econ Growth 9:5–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clingingsmith D, Williamson JG (2004) India’s de-industrialization under British rule: new ideas, new evidence. NBER Working Paper 10586Google Scholar
  16. Corden WM (1966) The structure of a tariff system and the effective protective rate. J Political Econ 74:221–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crafts N (2004) Globalisation and economic growth: a historical perspective. World Econ 27(1):45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Customs and Excise (1949) Fortieth report of the Commissioners of his majesty’s customs and excise for the year ended 31st March 1949. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. DeJong DL, Ripoll M (2006) Tariffs and growth: an empirical exploration of contingent relationships. Rev Econ Stat 88:625–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Estevadeordal A, Taylor AM (2008) Is the Washington consensus dead? Growth, openness, and the great liberalization, 1970s–2000s. NBER Working Papers 14264Google Scholar
  21. Ferreres OJ (ed) (2005) Dos siglos de economía argentina (1810–2004). Historia argentina en cifras. El Ateneo/Fundación Norte y Sur, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  22. Foreman-Peck J (1995) A model of later nineteenth-century European economic development. Revista de Historia Económica 13:441–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghatak S, Milner Ch, Utkulu U (1995) Trade liberalisation and endogenous growth: some evidence for Turkey. Econ Plan 28:147–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall RE, Jones ChI (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Q J Econ 114:83–116Google Scholar
  25. Harrison A, Hanson G (1999) Who gains from trade reform? Some remaining puzzles. J Dev Econ 59:125–154Google Scholar
  26. Irwin DA (1993) Free trade and protection in nineteenth century Britain and France revisited: comment on Nye. J Econ Hist 53:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Irwin DA (2002a) Interpreting the tariff-growth correlation of the late nineteenth century. Am Econ Rev (P&P) 91:165–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Irwin DA (2002b) Free trade under fire. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  29. Irwin DA (2010) Trade restrictiveness and deadweight losses from US tariffs, 1859–1961. Am Econ J Econ Policy 2:111–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacks DS (2006) New results on the tariff-growth paradox. Eur Rev Econ Hist 10:205–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johansen S (1996) Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Advanced texts in econometrics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Johansen S (2006) Confronting the economic model with the data. In: Colander D (ed) Post Walrasian macroeconomics: beyond the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, chap 15, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones ChI (2000) Comment on Rodríguez and Rodrik. NBER Macroecon Annu 15:330–337Google Scholar
  34. Juselius K (2006) The cointegrated VAR model. Methodology and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford (advanced texts in econometrics)Google Scholar
  35. Juselius K, Møller NF, Tarp F (2011) The long-run impact of foreign aid in 36 African countries: insights from multivariate time series analysis. UNU-WIDER Working Paper No. 200/51Google Scholar
  36. Kee HL, Nicita A, Olarreaga M (2009) Estimating trade restrictiveness indices. Econ J 119:172–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kubota K (2005) Fiscal constraints, collection costs, and trade policies. Econ Politics 17:129–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lawrence RZ (1993) Japan’s different trade regime: an analysis with particular reference to Keiretsu. J Econ Perspect 7(3):3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lehmann SH, O’Rourke KH (2011) The structure of protection and growth in the late 19th century. Rev Econ Stat 93(2):617–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lloyd P (2008) 100 Years of tariff protection in Australia. Aust Econ Hist Rev 48:99–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maddison A (2006) The world economy. Historical statistics. OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Madsen JB (2009) Trade barriers, openness, and economic growth. South Econ J 76:397–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matschke X (2008) Costly revenue-raising and the case for favoring import-competing industries. J Int Econ 74:143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nenci S (2011) Tariff liberalization and the growth of world trade: a comparative historical analysis to evaluate the multilateral trading system. World Econ 34:1809–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nunn N, Trefler D (2010) The structure of tariffs and long-term growth. Am Econ J Macroecon 2:158–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Rourke KH (2000) Tariffs and growth in the late 19th century. Econ J 110:456–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pashourtidou N (2003) Omitted variables in cointegration analysis. Department of Economics, University of Southampton, Discussion Paper No. 0304Google Scholar
  48. Prados de la Escosura L, Rosés JR, Sanz-Villarroya I (2012) Economic reforms and growth in Franco’s Spain. Revista de Historia Económica 30(1):45–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rodríguez F, Rodrik D (2000) Trade policy and economic growth: a sceptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER Macroecon Annu 15:261–325Google Scholar
  50. Rodrik D (2007) One economics, many recipes: globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  51. Roy T (2009) Did globalisation aid industrial development in colonial India? A study of knowledge transfer in the iron industry. Indian Econ Soc Hist Rev 46(4):579–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sachs J, Warner A (1995) Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brook Paper Econ Activ 1995:1–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sala-i-Martin X (1997) I just ran two million regressions. Am Econ Rev (P&P) 87:178–183Google Scholar
  54. Schularick M, Solomou S (2011) Tariffs and economic growth in the first era of globalization. J Econ Growth 16(1):33–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sharma A, Panagiotidis Th (2005) An analysis of exports and growth in India: cointegration and causality evidence (1971–2001). Rev Dev Econ 9:232–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tena A (2006) Assessing the protectionist intensity of tariffs in nineteenth-century European trade policy. In: Dormois J-P, Lains P (eds) Classical trade protectionism, 1815–1914. Routledge, London (Routledge explorations in economic history 32), pp 99–120Google Scholar
  57. Tena A (2010) Bairoch revisited: tariff structure and growth in the late nineteenth century. Eur Rev Econ Hist 14:111–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tena A, Lampe M, Tâmega FF (2012) How much trade liberalization was there in the world before and after Cobden–Chevalier? J Econ Hist 72:708–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tilly Ch (1993) Coercion, capital, and European states. AD 1990–1992. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  60. Vamvakidis A (2002) How robust is the growth-openness connection? Historical evidence. J Econ Growth 7:57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wacziarg R, Welch KH (2008) Trade liberalization and growth: new evidence. World Bank Econ Rev 22:187–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Williamson J (1990) Latin American adjustment: how much has happened?. Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  63. Yanikkaya H (2003) Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. J Dev Econ 72:57–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Carlos III MadridGetafeSpain
  2. 2.University of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations