Correction to: Chemical Papers (2018) 72:1437–1449 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-018-0400-3

Recently, the authors became aware of an error in Figure 7A of the indicated paper, where inadvertently the same microscope image was used twice to represent the control. We now present a fully corrected version of the entire figure 7. In making this correction , the authors note that there is no impact on the conclusions of the published paper. The authors would like to express their sincerest apologies to the editorial board and readership for this error.

Corrected Fig. 7

Fig. 7
figure 7

Microscopic assay for evaluation of live/dead bacterial cells. a Fluorescence images of the same samples at 528 nm (green) for SYTO9 signal of P. aeruginosa, live/dead proportions of P. aeruginosa cells stained with PI after application of b Eu–S-5–peptide, c Eu–S-6–peptide, d Tb–S-5–peptide, e Tb–S-5–peptide. f Fluorescence images of the same samples at 528 nm (green) for SYTO9 signal of S. typhimurium, live/dead proportions of S. typhimurium cells stained with PI after application of g Eu–S-5–peptide, h Eu–S-6–peptide, i Tb–S-5–peptide, j Tb–S-5–peptide