Abstract
Various technologies including carbon capture and utilization or sequestration (CCUS) have been defined to achieve sustainability. CCUS aims to reduce global anthropogenic CO2 emissions to tackle climate change by capturing carbon at the source of emission and prevent its entry into the atmosphere. The captured carbon is then either utilized in industries or sequestered geologically. CO2 capture is accomplished by employing several methods like the use of membranes, chemical looping, cryogenic distillation, etc. Membranes provide a more effective and economic alternative as compared to the options that exist currently. Hence, in this paper we try to scrutinise the properties of certain mixed matrix membranes (MMM), alumina and zeolite-based membranes among others with respect to their selectivity towards flue gases, hoping to provide a broader understanding of current technology. The potential use of ionic liquids (ILs) to enhance properties of membranes will also be discussed. Next, this paper investigates the existing as well as possible carbon utilization pathways. Existing pathways include the usage of CO2 in the manufacturing of fertilizers, urea, methanol, oil and gas recovery in addition to water desalination projects and electrochemical conversion to certain chemicals. While we observe that ILs and MMMs provide good alternatives, an extensive further research is, however, still required for implementation of these ideas on an industrial scale.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
All relevant data and material are presented in the main paper.
Abbreviations
- CCUS:
-
Carbon capture, utilization and sequestration
- RFG:
-
Recycled flue gases
- CFPP:
-
Coal-fired power plant
- PCC:
-
Pre-combustion capture
- WGS:
-
Water gas shift
- ALP:
-
Azo-linked polymer
- PEG:
-
Poly(ethylene glycol)
- MEA:
-
Mono-ethanolamine
- DEA:
-
Diethanolamine
- MDEA:
-
Methyl-diethanolamine
- MOF:
-
Metal/modified organic framework
- LDH:
-
Layered double hydroxides
- CLC:
-
Chemical looping combustions
- ZSM-5:
-
Zeolite Socony Mobil–5
- PAN:
-
Polyacrylonitrile
- PES:
-
Polyethersulphone
- FSC:
-
Fixed site carrier
- MMM:
-
Mixed matrix membranes
- SAPO-34:
-
Silicoaluminophosphate
- PAn:
-
Polyaniline
- GO:
-
Graphene oxide
- PVSH:
-
Polyvinyl sulphonic acid
- PVDF:
-
Polyvinylidene fluoride
- NATs:
-
Negative emissions techniques
- CUP:
-
Carbon utilization pathways
- IPCC:
-
Internal governmental panel on climate change
- BECCS:
-
Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage
- EOR:
-
Enhanced oil recovery
- EGR:
-
Enhanced gas recovery
- NG:
-
Natural gas
- FO:
-
Forward osmosis
- RO:
-
Reverse osmosis
- TDS:
-
Total dissolved solids
- WBG:
-
Wide bandgap (semiconductor)
- MMP:
-
Minimum miscible pressure
- DRM:
-
Dry reforming of methane
- COP:
-
Coefficient of performance
- CGI:
-
Continuous gas injection
- WAG:
-
Water alternating gas
References
Al-Mamoori A, Krishnamurthy A, Rownaghi AA, Rezaei F (2017) Carbon capture and utilization update. EnergTechnol 5(6):834–849. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201600747
Azzolina NA et al (2015) CO2 storage associated with CO2 enhanced oil recovery: a statistical analysis of historical operations. Int J Greenh Gas Control 37:384–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.03.037
Belaissaoui B, Favre E (2014) Membrane separation processes for post combustion carbon dioxide capture: state of the art and critical overview. Oil Gas SciTechnol Rev IFP Energiesnouvelles 69(6):1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2013163
Baena-Moreno FM, Rodríguez-Galán M, Vega F, Alonso-Fariñas B, Vilches Arenas LF, Navarrete B (2018) Carbon capture and utilization technologies: a literature review and recent advances. Energy Sour Part A RecovUtil Environ Effects. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1548518
Benemann JR (1993) Utilization of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel-burning power plants with biological systems. Energy Convers Manage 34(9–11):999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(93)90047-E
Boot-Handford ME, Abanades JC, Anthony EJ, Blunt MJ, Brandani S, Mac Dowell N, Fennell PS (2014) Carbon capture and storage update. Energy Environ Sci 7(1):130–189. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE42350F
Bounaceur R, Lape N, Roizard D, Vallieres C, Favre E (2006) Membrane processes for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: a parametric study. Energy 31:2556–2570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.10.038
Bryan N, Lasseuguette E, van Dalen M, Permogorov N, Amieiro A, Brandani S, Ferrari MC (2014) Development of mixed matrix membranes containing zeolites for post-combustion carbon capture. Energy Procedia 63:160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.016
Cho Y-K, Han K, Lee K-H (1995) Separation of CO2 by modified γ-Al2O3 membranes at high temperature. J Membrane Sci 104(3):219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(95)00033-9
Coates GW, Moore DR (2004) Discrete metal-based catalysts for the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides: discovery, reactivity, optimization, and mechanism. AngewandteChemInt Ed 43(48):6618–6639. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460442
Costs and Challenges of CCS, https://www.fossiltransition.org/pages/costs_and_challenges/136.php. Last active date 1/11/2020
Creamer AE, Gao B (2015) Carbon dioxide capture: an effective way to combat global warming. SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science
Dai Z, Deng L (2016) Membrane absorption using ionic liquid for pre-combustion CO 2 capture at elevated pressure and temperature. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 54:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.09.001
D’Alessandro DM, Smit B, Long JR (2010) Carbon dioxide capture: prospects for new materials. AngewandteChemieInt Edition 49(35):6058–6082. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201000431
Darensbourg DJ, Mackiewicz RM, Phelps AL, Billodeaux DR (2004) Copolymerization of CO2and epoxides catalyzed by metal salen complexes. AccChem Res 37(11):836–844. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar030240u
Duke MC, Ladewig B, Smart S, Rudolph V, Diniz da Costa JC (2009) Assessment of postcombustion carbon capture technologies for power generation. Front ChemEng China 4(2):184–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-009-0234-1
Favre E (2011) Membrane processes and postcombustion carbon dioxide capture: challenges and prospects. ChemEng J 171(3):782–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.01.010
Gibbins J, Chalmers H (2008) Carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 36(12):4317–4322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.058
Gozalpour F, Ren SR, Tohidi B (2005) CO2Eor and storage in oil reservoir. Oil Gas SciTechnol 60(3):537–546. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2005036
Grim RG, Huang Z, Guarnieri MT, Ferrell JR, Tao L, Schaidle JA (2019) Transforming the carbon economy: challenges and opportunities in the convergence of low-cost electricity and reductive CO2 utilization. Energy Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ee02410g
Gupta N et al (2014) 12th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, GHGT-12Testing for large-scale CO2-enhanced oil recovery and geologic storage in the Midwestern USA. Energy Procedia 63:6393–6403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.329
Hachisuka H, Ohara T, Ikeda K-I, Matsumoto K (1995) Gas permeation property of polyaniline films. J ApplPolymSci 56(11):1479–1485. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1995.070561109
Hepburn C, Adlen E, Beddington J, Carter EA, Fuss S, Mac Dowell N, Williams CK (2019) The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal. Nature 575(7781):87–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1681-6
Herzog H, Golomb D (2004) Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuel use. Encyclopaedia of Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00422-8
Huang C-H, Tan C-S (2014) A review: CO2 utilization. Aerosol Air Qual Res 14(2):480–499. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.10.0326
Hufton JR, Mayorga S, Sircar S (1999) Sorption-enhanced reaction process for hydrogen production. AIChE J 45(2):248–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690450205
Illing G, Hellgardt K, Wakeman RJ, Jungbauer A (2001) Preparation and characterisation of polyaniline based membranes for gas separation. J MembrSci 184(1):69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00606-2
J. Fletcher, V. Roan, D. Betts, An investigation of the feasibility of coal-based methanol for application in transportation fuel cell systems. In: 3rd international energy conversion engineering conference, (2005) California 2005. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-5606
Jhong H-R, Ma S, Kenis PJ (2013) Electrochemical conversion of CO2 to useful chemicals: current status, remaining challenges, and future opportunities. CurrOpinChemEng 2(2):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2013.03.005
Kentish SE, Scholes CA, Stevens GW (2008) Carbon dioxide separation through polymeric membrane systems for flue gas applications. Recent Patents ChemEng 1(1):52–66
Kim J-Y, Kim J, Yang S-T, Ahn W-S (2013) Mesoporous SAPO-34 with amine-grafting for CO2 capture. Fuel 108:515–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.020
Kusakabe K (1996) Morphology and gas permeance of ZSM-5-type zeolite membrane formed on a porous α-alumina support tube. J Membrane Sci 116(1):39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(96)00010-5
Kusakabe K, Ichiki K, Morooka S (1994) Separation of CO2 with BaTiO3 membrane prepared by the sol—gel method. J Membrane Sci 95(2):171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(94)00109-X
Kusakabe K, Yan Li Z, Maeda H, Morooka S (1995) Preparation of supported composite membrane by pyrolysis of polycarbosilane for gas separation at high temperature. J MembrSci 103(1–2):175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(94)00322-P
Kweon H, Lin C-W, Hasan MMF, Kaner RB, Sant GN (2019) Highly permeable polyaniline-graphene oxide nanocomposite membranes for CO2 separations. ACS ApplPolym Mater. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b00426
Lal R (2008) Carbon sequestration. Philos Trans R Soc B BiolSci 363(1492):815–830. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2185
Lei L, Bai L, Lindbråthen A, Pan F, Zhang X, He X (2020) Carbon membranes for CO2 removal: status and perspectives from materials to processes. ChemEng J 401:126084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126084
Liang C, Pan B, Ma Z, He Z, Duan Z (2019) Utilization of CO2 curing to enhance the properties of recycled aggregate and prepared concrete: a review. Cement Concr Compos. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103446
López R, JesúsDíaz M, José A-P (2018) Extra CO2 sequestration following reutilization of biomass ash. Sci Total Environ 625:1013–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.263
Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Connors S (2018). Global warming of 1.5 C. In: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of, 1.
Mathias SA, Hardisty PE, Trudell MR, Zimmerman RW (2009) Approximate solutions for pressure buildup during CO2 injection in brine aquifers. Transp Porous Med 79:265–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2008.2634.1
Matsuyama H, Matsui K, Kitamura Y, Maki T, Teramoto M (1999) Effects of membrane thickness and membrane preparation condition on facilitated transport of CO2 through ionomer membrane. Sep PurifTechnol 17(3):235–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(99)00047-7
McCool B, Xomeritakis G, Lin Y (1999) Composition control and hydrogen permeation characteristics of sputter deposited palladium–silver membranes. J MembrSci 161(1–2):67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00087-3
McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M (2006) Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J MembrSci 278(1–2):114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.048
McGinnis RL, Hancock NT, Nowosielski-Slepowron MS, McGurgan GD (2013) Pilot demonstration of the NH3/CO2 forward osmosis desalination process on high salinity brines. Desalination 312:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.032
Melzer LS (2012) Carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery (CO2 EOR): factors involved in adding carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) to enhanced oil recovery. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, 1–17.
Meylan FD, Moreau V, Erkman S (2015) CO2 utilization in the perspective of industrial ecology, an overview. J CO2 Utilization, 12: 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2015.05.003
Mikulčić H, Skov IR, Dominković DF, Alwi SRW, Manan ZA, Tan R, Wang X (2019) Flexible carbon capture and utilization technologies in future energy systems and the utilization pathways of captured CO2. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 114:109338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109338
Mohammad M, Isaifan RJ, Weldu YW, Rahman MA, Al-Ghamdi SG (2020) Progress on carbon dioxide capture, storage and utilisation. Int J Global Warming 20(2):124–144. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2020.105386
Murakami M, Ikenouchi M (1997) The biological CO2 fixation and utilization project by rite (2) — screening and breeding of microalgae with high capability in fixing CO2 —. Energy Convers Manage 38:S493–S497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(96)00316-0
Nurariffudin M, Hashim H, Lim JS, Ho CS (2017) Economic assessment of microalgae-based CO 2 utilization in power plant sector in Malaysia. ChemEng Trans 56:643–648. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1756108
Ogawa M, Nakano Y (2000) Separation of CO2/CH4 mixture through carbonized membrane prepared by gel modification. J MembrSci 173(1):123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00352-5
Olah GA, Goeppert A, Prakash GKS (2009) Chemical recycling of carbon dioxide to methanol and dimethyl ether: from greenhouse gas to renewable, environmentally carbon neutral fuels and synthetic hydrocarbons. J Org Chem 74(2):487–498. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo801260f
Olah GA (2005) Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy. AngewChemInt Ed 44(18):2636–2639. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200462121
GalindoCifre P, Badr O (2007) Renewable hydrogen utilisation for the production of methanol. Energy Convers. Manage. 48(2):519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.06.011
Pérez-Fortes M, Bocin-Dumitriu A, Tzimas E (2014) CO2 Utilization pathways: techno-economic assessment and market opportunities. Energy Procedia 63:7968–7975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.834
Poehlein A, Schmidt S, Kaster AK, Goenrich M, Vollmers J, Thürmer A, Daniel R (2012) An ancient pathway combining carbon dioxide fixation with the generation and utilization of a sodium ion gradient for ATP synthesis. PLoS ONE 7(3):e33439. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033439
Poshusta JC, Tuan VA, Falconer JL, Noble RD (1998) Synthesis and permeation properties of SAPO-34 tubular membranes. IndEngChem Res 37(10):3924–3929. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie980240b
Rafiee A, Khalilpour KR, Milani D (2019) CO2 Conversion and utilization pathways. PolygenPolystorageChem Energy Hubs. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813306-4.00008-2
Ramasubramanian K, Verweij H, Winston Ho WS (2012) Membrane processes for carbon capture from coal-fired power plant flue gas: a modeling and cost study. J MembrSci 421–422:299–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.029
Rao MB, Sircar S (1993) Nanoporous carbon membranes for separation of gas mixtures by selective surface flow. J MembrSci 85(3):253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(93)85279-6
Rosa L, Reimer JA, Went MS, D’Odorico P (2020) Hydrological limits to carbon capture and storage. Nature Sustainab. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0532-7
Safi R, Agarwal RK, Banerjee S (2016) Numerical simulation and optimization of CO2 utilization for enhanced oil recovery from depleted reservoirs. ChemEngSci 144:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.01.021
Scholes CA, Kentish SE, Stevens GW (2009) The effect of condensable minor components on the gas separation performance of polymeric membranes for carbon dioxide capture. Energy Procedia 1:311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.043
Shah S, Shah M, Shah A, Shah M (2020) Evolution in the membrane-based materials and comprehensive review on carbon capture and storage in industries. Emerg Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-020-00069-2
Shin DW, Hyun SH, Cho CH, Han MH (2005) Synthesis and CO2/N2 gas permeation characteristics of ZSM-5 zeolite membranes. MicroporousMesoporous Mater 85(3):313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.06.035
Smit B, Park AHA, Gadikota G (2014) The grand challenges in carbon capture, utilization, and storage. Frontiers in Energy Research 2:55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2014.00055
Sood A, Veyas S (2017) Carbon capture and sequestration-a review. Earth Environ Sci 83:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-020-02566-4
Spigarelli BP, Kawatra SK (2013) Opportunities and challenges in carbon dioxide capture. J CO2 Utiliz, 1: 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2013.03.002
Sridhar S, Veerapur RS, Patil MB, Gudasi KB, Aminabhavi TM (2007) Matrimid polyimide membranes for the separation of carbon dioxide from methane. J ApplPolymSci 106(3):1585–1594. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.26306
Stuardi FM, MacPherson F, Leclaire J (2019) Integrated CO2-capture and utilization: a priority research direction. CurrOpin Green Sustain Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.02.003
Su F, Lu C, Cnen W, Bai H, Hwang JF (2009) Capture of CO2 from flue gas via multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Sci Total Environ 407(8):3017–3023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.007
Sweatman RE, Crookshank S, Edman S (2011) Outlook and technologies for Offshore CO2 EOR/CCS projects. Offshore TechnolConf. https://doi.org/10.4043/21984-MS
TakhtRavanchi M, Sahebdelfar S (2014) Carbon dioxide capture and utilization in petrochemical industry: potentials and challenges. Appl Petrochem Res 4(1):63–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13203-014-0050-5
Theo WL, Lim JS, Hashim H, Mustaffa AA, Ho WS (2016) Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage. Appl Energy 183:1633–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.103
Varghese OK, Paulose M, LaTempa TJ, Grimes CA (2009) High-rate solar photocatalytic conversion of CO2 and water vapor to hydrocarbon fuels. NanoLett 9(2):731–737. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl803258p
Wang Q, Huang F, Cornelius CJ, Fan Y (2020) Carbon molecular sieve membranes derived from crosslinkable polyimides for CO2/CH4 and C2H4/C2H6 separations. J MembrSci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118785
Wang R, Peng B, Huang K (2015) The research progress of CO2 sequestration by algal bio-fertilizer in China. J CO2 Utiliz, 11, 67–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2015.01.007
Whipple DT, Kenis PJA (2010) Prospects of CO2 utilization via direct heterogeneous electrochemical reduction. J PhysChemLett 1(24):3451–3458. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz1012627
Wilberforce T, Baroutaji A, Soudan B, Al-Alami AH, Olabi AG (2019) Outlook of carbon capture technology and challenges. Sci Total Environ 657:56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.424
Wilcox J, Haghpanah R, Rupp EC, He J, Lee K (2014) Advancing adsorption and membrane separation processes for the gigaton carbon capture challenge. Annu Rev ChemBiomolEng 5(1):479–505. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040100
He X (2018) A review of material development in the field of carbon capture and the application of membrane-based processes in power plants and energy-intensive industries. Energy Sustain Soc 8:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0177-9
He X, Yu Q, Hägg MB (2013b) In: EMV H, Tarabara VV (ed) Encyclopedia of membrane science and technology, CO2 capture (Wiley, 2013b), pp. 1–2390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118522318.emst094
Xin M, Shuang L, Yue L, Qinzhu G (2015) Effectiveness of gaseous CO2 fertilizer application in China's greenhouses between 1982 and 2010. J CO2 Utiliz, 11: 63–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2015.01.005
Xomeritakis G, Tsai CY, Jiang YB, Brinker CJ (2009) Tubular ceramic-supported sol–gel silica-based membranes for flue gas carbon dioxide capture and sequestration. J MembrSci 341(1–2):30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.05.024
Xu Z, Jiang Y, Jia B, Zhou G (2016) Elevated-CO2 response of stomata and its dependence on environmental factors. Front Plant Sci 7:657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00657
Yang H, Xu Z, Fan M, Gupta R, Slimane RB, Bland AE, Wright I (2008) Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: a review. J Environ Sci 20(1):14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60002-9
Yave W, Car A, Peinemann KV (2010) Nanostructured membrane material designed for carbon dioxide separation. J MembrSci 350(1–2):124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.12.019
Yazaydın AO, Snurr RQ, Park T-H, Koh K, Liu J, LeVan MD, Willis RR (2009) Screening of metal−organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas using a combined experimental and modeling approach. J Am ChemSoc 131(51):18198–18199. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9057234
Yong HH, Park HC, Kang YS, Won J, Kim WN (2001) Zeolite-filled polyimide membrane containing 2,4,6-triaminopyrimidine. J MembrSci 188(2):151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00659-1
Yuan L, Xu Y-J (2015) Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 into value-added and renewable fuels. Appl Surf Sci 342:154–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.050
Zhu Q (2019) Developments on CO2-utilization technologies. Clean Energy 3(2):85–100
Zong J, Sun L, Bao W (2020) Research of present status and development suggestions regarding the carbon capture, utilization and storage. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, vol 510, p 042001. IOP Publishing
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University for the permission to publish this research.
Funding
Not Applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors make a substantial contribution to this manuscript. CS, SR, HK, HP and MS participated in drafting the manuscript. CS, SR, HK and HP wrote the main manuscript. All the authors discussed the results and implication on the manuscript at all stages.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shah, C., Raut, S., Kacha, H. et al. Carbon capture using membrane-based materials and its utilization pathways. Chem. Pap. 75, 4413–4429 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-021-01674-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-021-01674-z