Abstract
Simulation of a single char particle for the synthesis gas production is challenging task due to its complex chemical reactions coupled with the varying physicochemical properties during the gasification process. Steam gasification of a single char particle require the favourable conditions for the CO and H2 enriched gas with minimum CO2 formation. Here, non-linear partial differential equation for the unsteady state diffusion-controlled reaction of a gasification agent (steam) inside the non-catalytic porous spherical char particle is numerically solved by staggered grid finite volume method with suitable boundary conditions. The steam gasification is numerically solved for the variable size char particle of two different diameters, i.e. 5 and 10 mm between the temperature range of 1000–1300 K. Gasification process at high-steam partial pressure suggests high H2 and CO concentration in the synthesis gases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chandra A, Chandra H (2004) Impact of Indian and imported coal on Indian thermal power plants. J Sci Ind Res India 63:156–162
Chavan P, Datta S, Saha S, Sahu G, Sharma T (2012) Influence of high ash Indian coals in fluidized bed gasification under different operating conditions. Solid Fuel Chem 46:108–113
Chen J, Chen W, Ji R, Jiao Y, Wang X (2019) Kinetic studies on bituminous coal char gasification using CO2 and H2O mixtures. Int J Green Energy 16:1144–1151
Choudhary D, Shankar R (2012) An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: a case study from India. Energy 42(1):510–521
Corella J, Sanz A (2005) Modeling circulating fluidized bed biomass gasifier. A pseudo-rigorous model for stationary state. Fuel Process Technol 86:1021–1053
Everson RC, Neomagus HWJP, Kasaini H, Njapha D (2006) Reaction kinetics of pulverized coal-chars derived from inertinite-rich coal discards: characterisation and combustion. Fuel 85:1067–1075
Gil S, Mocek P, Bialik W (2011) Changes in total active centres on particle surfaces during coal pyrolysis, gasification and combustion. Chem Eng Process 32:155–169
Gomez A, Mahinpey N (2015) Kinetic study of coal steam and CO2 gasification: a new method to reduce interparticle diffusion. Fuel 148:160–167
Gomez-Barea A, Ollero P (2006) An approximate method for solving gas–solid non-catalytic reactions. Chem Eng Sci 61:3725–3735
Groeneveld MJ, Swaaij WPMV (1980) Gasification of char particles with CO2 and H2O. Chem Eng Sci 35:307–313
Hecht ES, Shaddix CR, Geier M, Molina A, Haynes BS (2012) Effect of CO2 and steam gasification reactions on the oxy-combustion of pulverized coal char. Combust Flame 159(11):3437–3447
Holikova K, Zajdlik R, Markos J, Jelemensky L (2005) Comparison of single coal char particle combustion at different conditions. Chem Pap 59:413–420
Inayat A, Ahmad MM, Yusup S, Mutalib MIA (2010) Biomass steam gasification with in-situ CO2 capture for enriched hydrogen gas production: a reaction kinetics modelling approach. Energies 3:1472–1484
Jayaraman K, Gökalp I, Jeyakumar S (2017) Estimation of synergetic effects of CO2 in high ash coal-char steam gasification. Appl Therm Eng 110:991–998
Kajitani S, Suzuki N, Ashizawa M, Hara S (2006) CO2 gasification rate analysis of coal char in entrained flow coal gasifier. Fuel 85:163–169
Kwon TW, Kim SD, Fung DPC (1988) Reaction kinetics of char–CO2 gasification. Fuel 67:530–535
Lahijani P, Zainal ZA, Mohammadi M, Mohamed AR (2015) Conversion of the greenhouse gas CO2 to the fuel gas CO via the Boudouard reaction: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:615–632
Li Z, Yang T, Yuan S, Yin Y, Devid EJ, Huang Q, Auerbach D, Kleyn AW (2020) Boudouard reaction driven by thermal plasma for efficient CO2 conversion and energy storage. J Energy Chem 45:128–134
Luo C, Watanabe T, Nakamura M, Uemiya S, Kojima T (2001) Development of FBR measurement of char reactivity to carbon dioxide at elevated temperatures. Fuel 80:233–243
Mendes A, Dollet A, Ablitzer C, Perrais C, Flamant G (2008) Numerical simulation of reactive transfer in spouted beds at high temperature: application to coal gasification. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 82:117–128
Mermoud F, Golfier F, Salvador S, de Steene LV, Dirion JL (2006) Experimental and numerical study of steam gasification of a single charcoal particle. Combust Flame 145:59–79
Mishra A, Gautam S, Sharma A (2018) Effect of operating parameters on coal gasification. Int J Coal Sci Technol 5:113125
Mohamad AA (2005) Combustion in porous media: fundamentals and applications. Transport phenomena in porous media III. Elsevier, Pergamon, pp 287–304
Prabhakar A, Sadhukhan AK, Bhunia S, Gupta P (2019) Modelling and experimental investigations on gasification of coarse sized coal char particle with steam. J Energy Inst 92:1502–1518
Prestipino M, Galvagno A, Karlström O, Brink A (2018) Energy conversion of agricultural biomass char: steam gasification kinetics. Energy 161:1055–1063
Seshadri K, Bai XS (2017) Rate-ratio asymptotic analysis of the influence of addition of carbon monoxide on the structure and mechanisms of extinction of nonpremixed methane flames with comparison to experiments. Combust Flame 175:107–117
Shufen L, Ruizheng S (1994) Kinetic studies of a lignite char pressurized gasification with CO2, H2 and steam. Fuel 73:413–416
Tremel A, Spliethoff H (2013) Gasification kinetics during entrained flow gasification—Part II: intrinsic char reaction rate and surface area development. Fuel 107:653–661
Umeki K, Yamamoto K, Namioka T, Yoshikawa K (2010) High temperature steam-only gasification of woody biomass. Appl Energy 87:791–798
Varma AK, Thakur LS, Shankar R, Mondal P (2019) Pyrolysis of wood sawdust: effects of process parameters on products yield and characterization of products. Waste Manag 89:224–235
Wang X, Jiang M, Yao Y, Zhang Y, Cao J (2009) Steam gasification of coal char catalyzed by K2CO3 for enhanced production of hydrogen without formation of methane. Fuel 88:1572–1579
Wang ZH, Zhang K, Li Y, He Y, Kuang M, Li Q, Cen KF (2016) Gasification characteristics of different rank coals at H2O and CO2 atmospheres. J Anal Appl Pyrol 122:76–83
Xu Q, Pang S, Levi T (2011) Reaction kinetics and producer gas compositions of steam gasification of coal and biomass blend chars, part 2: mathematical modelling and model validation. Chem Eng Sci 66:2232–2240
Yadav VK, Kumar V (2014) Modelling gasification of single coal particle. In: 5th International and 41th National conference on fluid mechanics and fluid power (FMFP-2014), 12th–14th December 2014, IIT Kanpur
Yadav VK, Kumar V (2016) Staggered grid finite volume approach for modeling single particle char gasification. Int J Chem React Eng 14(3):749–756
Ye DP, Agnew JB, Zhang DK (1998) Gasification of a South Australian low-rank coal with carbon dioxide and steam: kinetics and reactivity studies. Fuel 77:1209–1219
Zajdlik R, Jelemensky L, Markos J, Remiarova B (2001) Modelling of gasification of a single coal char particle. Chem Pap 55:364–368
Zeng DW, Xiao R, Zhang S, Zhang HY (2015) Bio-oil heavy fraction for hydrogen production by iron-based oxygen carrier redox cycle. Fuel Process Technol 139:1–7
Zeng J, Xiao R, Zeng D, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Shen D (2016) High H2/CO ratio syngas production from chemical looping gasification of sawdust in a dual fluidized bed gasifier. Energy Fuel 30(3):1764–1770
Zhu L, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Li J, Yu G (2020) Effects of H2 and CO on char–gasification reactivity at high temperatures. Energy Fuel 34:720–727
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial and other related support from Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yadav, V.K., Shankar, R. & Kumar, V. Numerical simulation for the steam gasification of single char particle. Chem. Pap. 75, 863–872 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01348-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01348-2