Skip to main content
Log in

Vitamin D and the Metabolic Phenotype in Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: A Longitudinal Study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the influence of vitamin D (VD) concentrations coupled with metabolic phenotypes preoperatively and 6 months after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on body variables and weight loss.

Materials and Methods

A longitudinal, retrospective, analytical study comprising 30 adult individuals assessed preoperatively (T0) and 6 months (T1) after undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The participants were distributed preoperatively into metabolically healthy obese (MHO) and metabolically unhealthy obese individuals (MUHO) according to the HOMA-IR classification, as well as the adequacy and inadequacy of vitamin D concentrations in the form of 25(OH)D. All participants were assessed for weight, height, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), visceral adiposity index (VAI), body circularity index (BCI), body adiposity index (BAI), weight loss, and assessment of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D concentrations using high-performance liquid chromatography with an ultraviolet detector (HPLC–UV). The statistical program used was SPSS version 21.

Results

VD adequacy and a healthy phenotype in the preoperative period may play an important role concerning body fat distribution, as the body averages for WHtR (0.020*) and BCI (0.020*) were lower in MHO participants. In comparison, those with VD inadequacy and MUHOs had higher BAI averages (0.000*) in the postoperative period. Furthermore, it is possible that VD inadequacy before and after RYGB, even in the presence of an unhealthy phenotype, may contribute to the increase in VAI values (0.029*) after this surgery. Only those with inadequate VD and MUHOs had higher 25(OH)D concentrations. Besides, this unhealthy phenotype had a greater reduction in BMI in the early postoperative period (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study suggests that VD adequacy and the presence of a healthy phenotype appear to have a positive impact on the reduction of visceral fat in the context of pre- and postoperative obesity. In addition, there was a greater weight reduction in those with VD inadequacy and in MUHO, which suggests that the volumetric dilution effect of VD and catabolism after bariatric surgery is more pronounced in this specific metabolic phenotype.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ABESO. (2022). Posicionamento sobre o tratamento nutricional do sobrepeso e da obesidade. https://www.abeso.org.br/posicionamento-nutricional

  2. Bradley LE, Forman EM, Kerrigan SG, et al. Project HELP: a remotely delivered behavioral intervention for weight regain after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27(3):586–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2337-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley LE, Forman EM, Kerrigan SG, et al. A pilot study of an acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight regain after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2433–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2125-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crewe C, An YA, Scherer PE. The ominous triad of adipose tissue dysfunction: inflammation, fibrosis, and impaired angiogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(1):74–82. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI88883.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferreira FG, Juvanhol LL, da Silva DCG, et al. Visceral adiposity index is a better predictor of unhealthy metabolic phenotype than traditional adiposity measures: results from a population-based study. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(9):1545–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898001800335X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sato F, Maeda N, Yamada T, et al. Association of epicardial, visceral, and subcutaneous fat with cardiometabolic diseases. Circ J. 2018;82:502–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blüher M. Metabolically healthy obesity. Endocr Rev. 2020;41(3):bnaa004. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnaa004.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghaben AL, Scherer PE. Adipogenesis and metabolic health. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(4):242–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-018-0093-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eckel N, Li Y, Kuxhaus O, et al. Transition from metabolic healthy to unhealthy phenotypes and association with cardiovascular disease risk across BMI categories in 90 257 women (the Nurses’ Health Study): 30-year follow-up from a prospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(9):714–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30137-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuk JLM, Rotondi M, Sui X, et al. Individuals with obesity but no other metabolic risk factors are not at significantly elevated all-cause mortality risk in men and women. Clin Obes. 2018;8(5):305–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stefan N, Schick F, Häring HU. Causes, characteristics, and consequences of metabolically unhealthy normal weight in humans. Cell Metab. 2017;26(2):292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.07.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Karpe F, Pinnick KE. Biology of upper-body and lower-body adipose tissue–link to whole-body phenotypes. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(2):90–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. González-González JG, Violante-Cumpa JR, Zambrano-Lucio M, et al. HOMA-IR as a predictor of health outcomes in patients with metabolic risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2022;29(6):547–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-022-00542-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Duan L, Han L, Liu Q, et al. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on general and central obesity: results from 20 randomized controlled trials involving apparently healthy populations. Ann Nutr Metab. 2020;76(3):153–64. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alkhatatbeh MJ, Abdul-Razzak KK, Khasawneh LQ, et al. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and correlation of serum vitamin D with cardiovascular risk in patients with metabolic syndrome. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2017;15(5):213–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2017.0003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pereira-Santos M, Costa PR, Assis AM, et al. Obesity and vitamin D deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(4):341–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Guidelines for preventing and treating vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency revisited. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(4):1153–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Faludi AA, Izar MCO, Saraiva JFK, et al. Atualização da Diretriz Brasileira de Dislipidemias e Prevenção da Aterosclerose – 2017. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;109(2Supl.1):1–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. American Diabetes Association. Summary of new revision. Diabetes Care. 2022;45.

  20. World Health Organization (WHO). Facts sheet on obesity and overweight. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  21. WHO Consultation on Obesity (1999: Geneva, Switzerland) & World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organization. 2000. Available at: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/42330

  22. Ukoli FA, et al. Body fat distribution and other anthropometric blood pressure correlate in a Nigerian urban elderly population. Central Afr J Med (CAJM). 2000;41(5):154–161. UZ, Mt. Pleasant, Harare; Faculty of Medicine

  23. de Groot LC, Sette S, Zajkás G, et al. Nutritional status: anthropometry. Euronut SENECA investigators. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991;45(Suppl 3):31–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sousa TF. Atividadesfísicas praticadas no lazer por universitários de uma instituição pública do Nordeste do Brasil. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saúde. 2011.

  25. Zeng Q, He Y, Dong S, et al. Optimal cut-off values of BMI, waist circumference and waist:height ratio for defining obesity in Chinese adults. Br J Nutr. 2014;112(10):1735–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514002657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gofin J, Abramson JH, Kark JD, et al. The prevalence of obesity and its changes over time in middle-aged and elderly men and women in Jerusalem.Int J Obes. 1996.

  27. Bergman RN, Stefanovski D, Buchanan TA, et al. A better index of body adiposity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011;19:1083–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gonçalves R, Mascarenhas LPG, Liebl EC, et al. Grau de concordância do IMC e do IAC com percentual de gordura corporal. Rev Bras Qualidade Vida. 2014;6(1):8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Amato MC, Giordano C, Galia M, et al. Visceral Adiposity Index: a reliable indicator of visceral fat function associated with cardiometabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(4):920–2. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1825.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Koning L, Merchant AT, Pogue J. Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular events: meta-regression analysis of prospective studies. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(7):850–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Amato MC, Giordano C, Pitrone M, et al. Cut-off points of the visceral adiposity index (VAI) identifying a visceral adipose dysfunction associated with cardiometabolic risk in a Caucasian Sicilian population. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:183.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vongsuvanh R, George J, McLeod D, et al. Visceral adiposity index is not a predictor of liver histology in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2012;57(2):392–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thomas DM, Bredlau C, Bosy-Westphal A, et al. Relationships between body roundness with body fat and visceral adipose tissue emerging from a new geometrical model. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(11):2264–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gumbs AA, Gagner M, Dakin G, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2007;17(7):962–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9151-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cummings GG, MacGregor T, Davey M, et al. Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(3):363–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rocha Q, Mendonça S, Fortes R. Perda Ponderal após Gastroplastia em Y de Roux e Importância do acompanhamento nutricional – Uma revisão de literatura. Ciências Saúde. 2011;22(1):61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023 Abridged for primary care providers. Standards of care in diabetes - 2023. Abridged for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes. 2022 Winter;41(1):4–31. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-as01.

  38. Xavier HT, Izar MC, Faria Neto JR, et al. V Diretriz brasileira de dislipidemias e prevenção da aterosclerose. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;101:1–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dorsey JG, Cooper WT. Retention mechanisms of bonded-phase liquid chromatography. Anal Chem. 1994;17:857–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Karelis AD, Faraj M, Bastard JP, et al. The metabolically healthy but obese individual presents a favorable inflammation profile. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2005;90:4145–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Karelis AD, Rabasa-Lhoret R. Characterization of metabolically healthy but obese individuals: should we add vitamin D to the puzzle? Diabetes Metab. 2014;40:319–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. da Cruz SP, Cruz S, Pereira S, et al. Adequacy and vitamin D in the preoperative period of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, bariatric surgery, can protect metabolic health in metabolically healthy and unhealthy individuals. Nutrients. 2022;14:402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030402.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dominoni LADC, Gabiatti MP, Piazza FRG, et al. Vitamin D is associated with body composition and fat intake, but not with cardiometabolic parameters in adults with obesity. Nutr Res. 2022;105:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2022.06.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Farrell SW, Pavlovic A, Barlow CE, et al. Desempenho na triagem funcional do movimento e associação com os principais marcadores de saúde em idosos. J Força Cond Res. 2021;35(11):3021–7. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pantovic A, Zec M, Zekovic M, et al. Vitamin D is inversely related to obesity: cross-sectional study in a small cohort of Serbian adults. J Am Coll Nutr. 2019;38(5):405–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2018.1538828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jonas MI, Kuryłowicz A, Bartoszewicz Z, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene expression in adipose tissue of obese individuals is regulated by miRNA and correlates with the pro-inflammatory cytokine level. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:5272. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wamberg L, Kampmann U, Stødkilde-Jørgensen H, et al. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on body fat accumulation, inflammation, and metabolic risk factors in obese adults with low vitamin D levels - results from a randomized trial. Eur J Intern Med. 2013;24(7):644–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2013.03.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Clemente-Postigo M, Roca-Rodriguez M del M, Camargo A, et al. Lipopolysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein levels and their relationship to early metabolic improvement after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):933-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.11.030.

  49. Zoico E, Franceschetti G, Chirumbolo S, et al. Phenotypic shift of adipocytes by cholecalciferol and 1α,25 dihydroxycholecalciferol in relation to inflammatory status and calcium content. Endocrinology. 2014;155(11):4178–88. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2013-1969.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Elkhwanky MS, Kummu O, Piltonen TT, et al. Obesity represses CYP2R1, the vitamin D 25-hydroxylase, in the liver and extrahepatic tissues. JBMR Plus. 2020;4(11):e10397. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Carrelli A, Bucovsky M, Horst R, et al. Vitamin D storage in adipose tissue of obese and normal weight women. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(2):237–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Beckman LM, Earthman CP, Thomas W, et al. Serum 25(OH) Vitamin D concentration changes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obesity. 2013;21(12):E599–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ghashut RA, Talwar D, Kinsella J, et al. The effect of the systemic inflammatory response on plasma vitamin 25 (OH) D concentrations adjusted for albumin. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hajhashemy Z, Shahdadian F, Ziaei R, et al. Níveis séricos de vitamina D em relação à obesidade abdominal: Uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise dose-resposta de estudos epidemiológicos. Obes Rev. 2021;22(2):e13134. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Williams SE. Metabolic bone disease in the bariatric surgery patient. J Obes. 2011;2011:634614. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/634614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Xanthakos SA. Nutritional deficiencies in obesity and after bariatric surgery. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009;56(5):1105–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2009.07.002.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Farrell SW, Pavlovic A, Barlow CE, et al. Desempenho na triagem funcional do movimento e associação com os principais marcadores de saúde em idosos. J Força Cond Res. 2021;35(11):3021–7. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pantovic A, et al. Vitamin D is inversely related to obesity: cross-sectional study in a small cohort of Serbian adults. J Am Coll Nutr. 2019;38(5):405–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suelem Pereira da Cruz.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Cruz, S.P., da Cruz, S.P., Pereira, S. et al. Vitamin D and the Metabolic Phenotype in Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: A Longitudinal Study. OBES SURG 34, 1561–1568 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07148-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07148-x

Keywords

Navigation