Skip to main content
Log in

A View from a Different Standing Point: Reply to the Letter to the Editor Titled “Is It Acceptable to Call a Position Statement Questionable to Raise More Doubt About an Already Debatable Procedure?”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Haddad A, Cohen RV. Reply to the letter to the editor titled “The Questionable IFSO Position Statement”. Is it acceptable to call a position statement questionable to raise more doubt about an already debatable procedure? Obes Surg 2002, Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06408-y

  2. Haddad A, Kow L, Herrera MF, et al. Innovative bariatric procedures and ethics in bariatric surgery: the IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2022;32(10):3217–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azevedo FR, Santoro S, Correa-Giannella ML, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the metabolic effects of sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition. Obes Surg. 2018;28(10):3012–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Viegas.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viegas, F. A View from a Different Standing Point: Reply to the Letter to the Editor Titled “Is It Acceptable to Call a Position Statement Questionable to Raise More Doubt About an Already Debatable Procedure?”. OBES SURG 33, 1270–1271 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06459-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06459-9

Navigation