Skip to main content
Log in

Three-Dimensional Multi-detector Computed Tomography (3D-MDCT) Gastric Volumetry in Patients with obesity and Normal-Weight Individuals

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a widely prevalent medical and socioeconomic problem. Bariatric surgery is indicated for patients with clinically severe obesity. Reduction of gastric volume is an important factor that contributes to weight loss after laparscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The impact of the gastric volume on weight after LSG has been studied.

Aim of the Study

This study was designed to assess the gastric volume in patients with obesity prior to LSG and in the normal-weight patients, using three-dimensional multi-detector computer tomography (3D-MDCT), and to evaluate the potential correlation of the gastric volume with body mass index (BMI).

Patients and Methods

A total of 100 patients were equally enrolled in two groups: one group for patients with obesity scheduled for LSG and another one for normal-weight patients scheduled for non-bariatric surgery. The study patients underwent 3D-MDCT gastric volumetry.

Results

The gastric volume ranged from 525 to 1170 mL in patients with obesity and from 312 to 676 mL in the normal-weight group. Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. Age, weight, and BMI were found to be predictors for the gastric volume in normal-weight patients only.

Conclusion

MDCT gastric volumetry is a feasible method to assess the stomach volume. Higher volumes were evident in patients with obesity. Age, weight, and BMI are predictors for the gastric volume in normal-weight patients with linear regression equations that could help during the preoperative planning of bariatric surgeries.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pantalone KM, Hobbs TM, Chagin KM, et al. Prevalence and recognition of obesity and its associated comorbidities: cross-sectional analysis of electronic health record data from a large US integrated health system. BMJ Open. 2017;7: e017583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Soong T-C, Lee M-H, Lee W-J, et al. Long-term efficacy of bariatric surgery for the treatment of super-obesity: comparison of SG, RYGB, and OAGB. Obes Surg. 2021;31:3391–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee M-H, Almalki OM, Lee W-J, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: long-term result and recurrence of diabetes. Obes Surg. 2020;30:3669–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paluszkiewicz R, Kalinowski P, Wróblewski T, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the management of patients with morbid obesity. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2012;7(4):225–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benaiges D, Más-Lorenzo A, Goday A, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: more than a restrictive bariatric surgery procedure? World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(41):11804–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Elbanna H, Emile S, El-Hawary GE-S, et al. Assessment of the correlation between preoperative and immediate postoperative gastric volume and weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy using computed tomography volumetry. World J Surg. 2019;43:199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salman MA, Elshazli M, Shaaban M, et al. Correlation between preoperative gastric volume and weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. IJGM Dove Press. 2021;14:8135–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. El Ansari W, Elhag W. Weight regain and insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery: definitions, prevalence, mechanisms, predictors, prevention and management strategies, and knowledge gaps—a scoping review. Obes Surg. 2021;31:1755–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Horton KM, Fishman EK. Current role of CT in imaging of the stomach. RadioGraphics Radiol Soc N Am. 2003;23:75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huh J, Lee I-S, Kim KW, et al. CT gastrography for volumetric measurement of remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy: a feasibility study. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41:1899–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmed OE, Refaat M, Shalaan A. The role of 3D-MSCT gastric pouch volumetric study in sleeve gastrectomy. Benha Med J. 2020;36:107–15 (Benha University, Faculty of Medicine).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SH, Keum B, Choi HS, et al. Stomach volume assessment using three-dimensional computed tomography gastrography for bariatric treatment. Obes Surg. 2020;30:401–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoad CL, Parker H, Hudders N, et al. Measurement of gastric meal and secretion volumes using magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(3):1367–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Deslandes A. Sonographic demonstration of stomach pathology: reviewing the cases. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2013;16(4):202–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blanchet MC, Mesmann C, Yanes M, et al. 3D gastric computed tomography as a new imaging in patients with failure or complication after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1727–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alva S, Eisenberg D, Duffy A, et al. Virtual three-dimensional computed tomography assessment of the gastric pouch following laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18(4):364–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deloose E, Janssen P, Depoortere I, et al. The migrating motor complex: control mechanisms and its role in health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9(5):271–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Geliebter A. Stomach capacity in obese individuals. Obes Res. 2001;9:727–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammad Khalil A, GaberRagab S, MakramBotros J, et al. Gastric residual volume assessment by gastric ultrasound in fasting obese patients: a comparative study. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11: e109732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Izquierdo AG, Crujeiras AB, Casanueva FF, et al. Leptin, obesity, and leptin resistance: where are we 25 years later? Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsani A, Widowati A, Dieny F, et al. Satiety profiles in obese and normal adults after high-carbohydrate diet ingestion. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2021;15:2051–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pegington M, French DP, Harvie MN. Why young women gain weight: a narrative review of influencing factors and possible solutions. Obes Rev. 2020;21: e13002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiao X, Wang W, Sa R, et al. The investigation of sex differences in the effect of body mass index. Int J Hypertens. 2019;2019:e1360328 (Hindawi).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Álvarez-Castro P, Pena L, Cordido F. Ghrelin in obesity, physiological and pharmacological considerations. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2013;13:541–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson B, Switzer NJ, Almamar A, et al. The impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on plasma ghrelin levels: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1476–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed AbdAlla Salman.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the Helsinki declaration.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key points

(1) Obesity is a widely prevalent medical and socioeconomic problem.

(2) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is presently one of the most popular bariatric techniques thanks to several reports on its promising outcomes.

(3) Three dimensional multi-detector computed tomography (3D-MDCT) gastric volumetry has been adopted as the most accurate method for assessment of the stomach volume after surgery.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salman, M.A., Othman, B., Elshehry, A. et al. Three-Dimensional Multi-detector Computed Tomography (3D-MDCT) Gastric Volumetry in Patients with obesity and Normal-Weight Individuals. OBES SURG 33, 418–425 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06402-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06402-4

Keywords

Navigation