Abstract
Purpose
Port-site trocar closure is a challenging procedure in laparoscopic surgeries, especially in morbidly obese patients, and complications (herniation, bleeding, pain, and nerve trapping) have potentially severe consequences. This paper provides an overview of existing techniques of suturing and closure in intra-abdominal laparoscopic surgery, outlines the complications associated with port-site closure, and presents a novel technique designed to address those problems by using a sterile absorbable gelatin sponge with strong hemostatic properties (Cutanplast® Plug).
Materials and Methods
In this prospective study, 83 successive obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery (sleeve gastrectomy, sleeve plication, gastric bypass), using a standardized skin incision for trocar insertion, had port-site closure using the Cutanplast plug procedure (n = 42) or conventional suturing techniques (n = 41).
Results
The incidence of early complications was lower in the Cutanplast group; no patients had infections compared with 9.8% of Controls (p = 0.055) and no bleeding, ecchymosis, erythema, or redness occurred. Late complications during 2 years of follow-up were significantly lower in the Cutanplast group (0 vs. 7 hernias, p = 0.005). Most patients in the Cutanplast group required only 1–2 procedures (78.6% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.049), whereas 41.5% of controls required 3 procedures. In total, 82 trocars were used in the Cutanplast group versus 99 in controls. The single-step Cutanplast plug technique reduced operating times compared with two-step suturing techniques.
Conclusion
Closure of port-site trocar incisions using Cutanplast plug is fast, efficient, with potential to reduce operating times and decrease bleeding and herniation from port-site trocars insertion, particularly in obese patients.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Laparoscopic surgery, as a widely practiced procedure that offers practical benefits over conventional surgical approaches, including minimizing blood loss, reducing wound-related complications, faster recovery, avoiding large incisions, reductions in post-operative pain, and shorter hospital stays [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], is accepted as the gold standard for the surgical management of many organ systems, including the reproductive and digestive systems [8,9,10].
Trocars are used in laparoscopic procedures to provide a portal for the placement of surgical instruments. Typically, three to four or more trocars of different sizes ranging from 5 to 15 mm in diameter are used in abdominal surgery [11, 12]. Although generally safe, laparoscopic surgery is not without complications. The greater the trocar diameter, the higher the reported incidence of port-site complications such as bleeding, herniation, pain, infection, epiploic entrapment, and neuroma [1, 4, 5, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
Port-site trocar incision closure is a challenging procedure in laparoscopic surgeries, particularly in patients with clinically severe (morbid) obesity [12]. Complications related to port-site trocars, even if uncommon, may have severe consequences that can lead to reoperation and permanent damage [13, 15, 16, 21]. Surgical methods of closing trocar sites, such as various suturing techniques, show a high rate of herniation, bleeding, pain, and nerve trapping among patients [13]. Various procedures have been investigated to minimize port-site complications during or after laparoscopic surgery, including specialized instruments and suturing techniques [5, 11,12,13,14, 22,23,24,25]. However, despite the availability of preexisting suturing methods and materials developed for port-site closures, the incidence of failure and complications (pain, infection, herniation, neuroma) following laparotomy incisions remains significant [25].
A novel technique for port closure with the potential to reduce operating times and decrease the incidence of bleeding and herniation from the insertion of port-site trocars has been developed using a sterile absorbable gelatin sponge with strong hemostatic properties (Cutanplast® Plug) [26, 27]. The technique has particular relevance to the obese population and is especially advantageous when access for the closure of port-site incisions by suturing is very difficult. The approach provides an alternative technique of trocar port-site closure in laparoscopic surgery, particularly laparoscopic bariatric procedures.
Therefore, a study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of the new technique as an alternative to conventional suturing procedures for the closure of port-site trocar incisions and the prevention of port-site trocar complications. In addition, an overview of existing instruments and techniques of suturing and closure in intra-abdominal laparoscopic surgery is presented, and the complications associated with port-site closure are discussed.
Laparoscopic Port-Site Complications
Although a relatively safe procedure, it is essential to recognize and understand the early and late complications that can occur after laparoscopic surgery. The incidence of port-site bleeding, which may not initially be apparent because of tamponade of muscular or subcutaneous bleeding, has variously been reported as between 0.7 and 1.9% [13, 28].
Trocar-site herniation, and related complications, including omentum entrapment, may occur after laparoscopic surgery, with a reported incidence of between 0.5 and 5% [4, 16]. Notably, Owens and colleagues systematically reviewed the incidence of port-site hernias, analyzing data from 11,699 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal procedures. They found an overall incidence of 0.74% over a mean follow-up of 23.9 months [4], with the lowest incidence observed for bariatric surgery (0.57%) and the highest incidence for laparoscopic colorectal surgery (1.47%). This is largely in agreement with the findings of Swank et al., who found a median pooled estimate of 0.50% for trocar-site hernias when they analyzed data from 22 studies (randomized trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies) that each enrolled ≥ 300 patients who had undergone abdominal surgery [16]. Pyramidal trocars, larger trocar diameter, and long duration of operative time were shown to be patient-related risk factors for port-site hernias [16], and the rate of trocar-site hernias is higher when bladed versus non-bladed trocars are used [5].
Post-surgery wound infection may contribute to late port-site hernia formation [4]. A port-site infection rate after laparoscopic surgery of 1.8% was reported by Karthik et al. [13], a rate of wound infection much lower than after open bariatric surgery [7, 13].
Conventionally, various techniques and interventions have been adopted to prevent or treat laparoscopic port-site complications [14, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Post-operative bleeding may require surgical reintervention using direct or laparoscopic surgery (cauterizing/applying a clip/suturing through the skin incision or laparoscopically under direct vision) in only approximately 10% of cases. Blood transfusions and other standard supportive treatments may successfully avoid the need for reoperation to control bleeding in the majority of patients [31, 32, 34,35,36]. Herniation and epiploic entrapment require direct suturing through the skin incision or under laparoscopic vision [4, 11, 13, 14, 21].
Current Laparoscopic Port Instruments, Suturing, and Wound Closure
The range of laparoscopic port instruments encompasses a myriad of devices manufactured by more than 20 manufacturers [11, 38]. It is beyond the scope of this article to describe or illustrate all available devices or compare and contrast their relative merits and disadvantages. However, a representative selection of laparoscopic instruments and closure techniques is shown in Fig. 1. These include the Standard Loop Closure, the Vector X™ neoClose™ Closure, the Weck EFx Endo Fascial Closure, the laparoscopic suture passer, the NeatStich laparoscopic port closure, the multifunctional laparoscopic trocar with built-in fascial closure and stabilization, the Karl Storz Laparoscopy Needle, the Neoclosure Anchor Guide, and the Carter-Thomason Port Closure System.
A variety of techniques may be employed to close port-site wounds. Although suturing is the conventional way to close trocar port sites and treat bleeding and herniation, trocar port-site suturing is very difficult to perform, time-consuming in people with obesity, and imprecise [11, 21, 39, 40]. Therefore, most surgeons do not perform port-site suturing because of the difficulties encountered. Recommendations for when laparoscopic fascial wound closure should be considered and conventional closure techniques have been well reported by La Chapelle and colleagues on behalf of a Dutch Minimally Invasive Surgery multidisciplinary guideline development group [11] and by Natalin et al. [38]. Techniques for closing port-site wounds include direct closure with retractors, laparoscopic closure with suture retrievers, subcuticular continuous suturing, and the use of tissue adhesives, skin tapes, or hemostats [1, 11, 12, 25, 38]. However, there are no definitive evidence-based recommendations for individual suturing methods for fascial closure resulting in the least complications.
Trocar Port-Site Closure Using Cutanplast Biodegradable Plugs
Mascia Brunelli S.p.A., located in Milan, Italy, manufactures class III implantable and absorbable hemostatic devices for surgery and distributes a range of other medical devices for surgery and use in intensive care units (ICU). The company’s products are manufactured and distributed according to ISO Classifications and European Union Directives. One of their products is Cutanplast®, a novel sterile resorbable gelatin with a powerful hemostatic effect [26, 27].
Cutanplast is a CE-certified class III implantable medical device registered according to European directive 93/42/CEE and available in film, powder, and sponge formats.
A range of Cutanplast products have been developed and have established roles as absorbable biomaterials with hemostatic and wound healing properties in applications such as nasal packing after endoscopic sinus procedures, dental surgery, anal surgery, and other gynecological, general, and orthopedic surgical procedures [27, 41, 42]. The gelatin sponge plug device used for port-site closure is biocompatible and non-toxic, hypoallergenic, has a neutral pH, and absorbs blood corresponding to approximately 50 times its own weight [27, 41,42,43]. It is rapidly hemostatic and completely absorbed over a period of 4–6 weeks [44] when left in situ, providing a safe and reliable method of port-site closure. Despite a theoretical potential for hypersensitivity responses with gelatin products, it does not appear to be associated with acute or delayed hypersensitivity reactions [43]. The porous surface of the gelatin induces the rapid rupture of blood platelets, facilitating activation of the enzymatic cascade leading to natural coagulation [26, 45].
The trocar port-site closure technique uses a standard conic plug of standard length and width made of biodegradable Cutanplast, of different densities according to the trocar diameter (Fig. 2). Low-, medium- and high-density plugs are used for trocars of 10-, 12-, and 15-mm diameters, respectively. Closure using the Cutanplast cone does not require the use of trocars specific to a particular manufacturer; the cones can be applied using any laparoscopic trocar.
The positioning of the plug inside the trocar and inside the abdominal wall is illustrated in Fig. 3, and the technique for applying port-site Cutanplast cones is as follows, before the end of the operation and before removing the laparoscopic trocar:
-
1)
Introduce the dropping system of the Cutanplast plug inside and position it to the end of the trocar
-
2)
Push the plug by the syringe-like system 2 cm out of the trocar inside the abdominal cavity and/or under direct vision
-
3)
The final position of the plug is then adjusted by the surgeon under direct vision or by feeling a stop if the camera was removed from the abdominal cavity
-
4)
The trocar and the dropping system are then completely removed
-
5)
Finally, after adjustment and positioning, the plug is fixed by suturing it to the subcutaneous fat tissue, 1–2 cm distant from the skin closure (fixation will prevent the migration of the plug into the intra-abdominal cavity)
-
6)
At the end of the procedure, the skin is closed
Clinical Study
Material and Methods
This was a single-center prospective study carried out on patients with obesity who underwent various laparoscopic bariatric procedures in the Department of Surgery at our institution, Abou Jaoude Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon, between May 2017 and April 2018. The study aimed to prevent port-site complications by using a new concept that replaces suturing procedures to close trocar incisions with the insertion of the absorbable hemostatic gelatin plug (Cutanplast). The procedures included sleeve gastrectomy, sleeve plication, and gastric bypass. These bariatric procedures are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 40 kg/m2 or ≥ 35 mg/kg2 with ≥ 1 more severe comorbid conditions, in whom conservative weight reduction alternatives have failed [46].
The protocol and design of the Cutanplast study were approved by the institutional review board at Abou Jaoude Hospital on 14 January 2017, granting the author exclusive permission to conduct the study. The study aimed to close the port-site trocar incisions using the Cutanplast plug and record the results and complications, particularly bleeding and herniation, in a total of 30 patients.
Consecutive patients attending the clinic were selected for the study according to their BMI and comorbidities, using the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of obesity as a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, in accord with the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS; https://asmbs.org) [47,48,49].
The inclusion criteria for bariatric surgery were guided by the ASMBS and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria for bariatric surgery; that is, class III obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2; clinically severe [previously known as morbid] obesity), class II obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m2) with at least one comorbidity, or class I obesity (BMI 30–35 kg/m2) and obesity-related comorbidities [9, 49, 50].
Exclusion criteria included obesity, related to endocrine disease; major psychiatric disorder; drug or alcohol dependency; genetic disorder, hepatic cirrhosis; chronic renal failure in dialysis; hiatal hernia greater than 4 cm; chronic inflammatory bowel disease; history of organ transplantation; previous abdominal surgery; refusal to cooperate; unavailability for prolonged post-operative follow-up.
After a thorough discussion of the benefits and risks and procedural options prior to the operation, informed consent was obtained from all patients for the bariatric surgical procedures, including the insertion of Cutanplast cones to close trocar port sites. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments, the internal regulations of Abou Jaoude Hospital, and following all other requirements of Lebanese law and the Lebanese Ministry of Health.
Pre-surgery clinical examination and laboratory tests included complete blood count, blood type, urinalysis, serum creatinine, fasting blood sugar, glycated hemoglobin, electrolytes, total, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid, albumin, vitamin D, vitamin B12, calcium, phosphorus, iron, ferritin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, Helicobacter pylori serology, pregnancy screening, electrocardiogram, chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasound, and gastroscopy if needed.
Post-operative consultation and assessment were performed at 1 week, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months by the surgeon and by a second senior surgeon. Clinical examination for infection, hematoma, seroma, pain, and herniation was noted in every patient at each consultation. In case of disagreement between the two surgeons, an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan was performed to eliminate the doubt.
Close follow-up was undertaken by clinical and radiological evaluation to monitor for adverse events and early and mid-term complications (bleeding, herniation, chronic pain) over a period of at least 2 years.
Surgical Procedures
Bariatric surgery in both the Cutanplast and Control groups was carried out by a single surgeon (YA) under general anesthesia with first-generation cephalosporin antibiotic prophylaxis with the same type of skin incision for trocar insertion in both methods. The first trocar entry was made using the Optiview visualizing trocar (Optiview, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA); the other trocars needed for this surgery were inserted under direct vision.
Trocar closure using Cutanplast is a single-step procedure that saves operative time to close trocar ports compared with conventional methods of closure. Perfect hemostasis is achieved by direct compression and biological action along the whole trocar site through the abdominal wall. The procedure is installed under direct vision and secures any blind zone where suturing is inaccessible and difficult to perform by conventional suturing technique (Supplementary Video). The plug mechanism prevents the migration of any intra-abdominal organ through the trocar site in the immediate and initial post-operative phase. In the second phase, the plug will be filled or replaced by a big clot. Finally, in the last phase, the clot is replaced by solid fibrosis which will prevent hernia formation. To further enhance this purpose, the plug can be enriched with a chemical or biological product that can increase fibroblast formation through the plug to induce greater fibrosis.
Efficacy Outcome Measures
Procedures were video recorded in all the patients, enabling comparison of operating times between groups. The efficacy of the bariatric procedure was analyzed using the weight loss index (weight loss index as a percent = (weight loss/excess weight) × 100) [51]. Total weight loss was defined as operative weight minus follow-up weight, divided by the operative weight and expressed as a percent (%TWL) [52].
Statistical Methods
A general linear model (GLM) analysis with percent weight loss index as the dependent variable was used for between-group comparisons. Age, baseline weight, number of procedures, number of plugs used, and study group were additional variables considered in the model. A two-sided probability level of ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant when comparing treatments.
Results
Demographics
A total of 83 patients with obesity who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery successively at our institution were included in the study and comprised the full analysis set (FAS). Forty-two patients (26 females and 16 males) with a mean age of 39.0 years had port-site closure using the Cutanplast biological plug. Forty-one patients (24 females and 17 males, mean age 39.7 years) who had port-site closure by different suturing techniques were included as a control group. Patient demographic data are summarized in Table 1. The patient groups were similar overall, although patients in the control group tended to be slightly shorter than those in the Cutanplast group, and the mean weight at baseline in the control group (101.7 ± 20.48 kg) was significantly lower than in the Cutanplast group (114.3 ± 24.1 kg; p = 0.12), as was excess weight (35.9 ± 18.10 vs. 45.5 ± 19.50; p = 0.023). Total excess weight at baseline for the overall patient population was 40.8 ± 19.32 kg (median 37.5; range 6–90 kg).
The number of procedures by study group is shown in Table 2. The total number of procedures was 42 in the Cutanplast group and 41 in controls. The majority of patients in the Cutanplast group required only 1 or 2 procedures (78.6% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.049), whereas 41.5% of controls required 3 procedures. In total, 82 trocars were used in the Cutanplast group; 57, 12, and 13 trocars were used to close 10-, 12-, and 15-mm diameter port sites, respectively. In the control group, 99 trocars were used; 78, 13, and 8 were used to close 10-, 12-, and 15-mm diameter port sites, respectively.
A review of the video recordings of the procedures confirmed that trocar port-site closure by the single-step plug technique reduced operating times compared with the two-step suturing technique used in control group patients (data not shown).
Weight loss, measured by the weight loss index, was more successful in the Cutanplast group compared with Controls (p = 0.001) (Table 3 and Fig. 4). Multivariable regression analysis by the number of plugs using a general linear model (GLM) with weight loss index as a dependent variable showed that baseline weight and the number of procedures were independently associated with weight loss after surgery (p = 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively; R-squared = 0.362; adjusted R-squared = 0.308). The study group was a non-significant factor under GLM analysis (p = 0.171).
The estimated marginal mean was 64.330 (standard error 4.499, 95% CI 55.327–73.333) for the Cutanplast group and 73.296 (4.970, 63.340–83.241) for controls.
Complications
Except for infection and seroma, the incidence of early complications was significantly lower in the Cutanplast group (Table 4). Of note, although the between-group difference did not reach statistical significance, no patients in the Cutanplast group had an infection as an early complication, compared with nearly 10% of controls. Specifically, in the Cutanplast group, 5 patients had minimal parietal pain, 1 patient had a parietal seroma 1 week after the surgery, which resolved with spontaneous evacuation, 1 a hematoma, and no bleeding, ecchymosis, erythema, redness, or infection was observed. Figure 5 shows a trocar port-site complication (seroma) closed by a Cutanplast plug.
Similarly, except for neuralgia, which was experienced by 1 patient in the control group and no patients in the Cutanplast group, the incidence of late complications (chronic pain and port-site hernia) was significantly lower in the Cutanplast group (Table 4). Of note, no port-site hernias occurred in the Cutanplast group during two years of follow-up, compared with 7 in the control group.
Discussion
Our study shows that the closure of trocar port sites using Cutanplast plug has the potential to reduce the operating time and decrease the bleeding and herniation rate from port-site trocar insertion, particularly in the obese population. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare conventional suturing techniques to the Cutanplast plug technique for trocar port-site closure. The technique is advantageous when access for port closure by suturing is very difficult and, in our opinion, addresses issues relating to preexisting suturing methods and current materials for port-site closures, which are associated with a high rate of failure and complications. With the plug closure technique, we are using a new concept that exerts the appropriate pressure and biological effect inside the trocar site created by the trocar defect insertion that accelerates hemostasis to control bleeding and prevent herniation in a single step.
The length of operative time arises from a combination of factors, including the technical skill of the surgeon and the supporting medical team, the complexity of the case, the type of procedure and the utilization of open or laparoscopic access, patient factors, and the infrastructure, equipment, and caseload of the institution [10]. From our experience, and as reported in the literature, the obese population is a high-risk patient group, and prolonged operative time and rate of complications are directly correlated with mortality after bariatric surgery [10, 53, 54]. In addition, a significant association between operative times and the rate of complications for laparoscopic bariatric surgery procedures has been demonstrated [55, 56].
Therefore, the use of this innovative technique for port closure using the Cutanplast® plug, which we have shown reduces operating time and decreases the bleeding and herniation rate from the insertion of port-site trocars, has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce surgery-related mortality following laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
Limitations
The small sample size of this study limits the generalization of our data. However, we believe that the significant differences in important early and late complication rates between this novel technique for port-site closure are of interest and warrant further consideration of using the Cutanplast gelatin plug as an alternative to conventional suturing approaches.
Conclusions
Our experience suggests that the Cutanplast biodegradable plug technique provides a convenient and efficient one-step approach to trocar port-site closure with a low incidence of early and late complications.
References
Coblijn UK, de Raaff CA, van Wagensveld BA, et al. Trocar port hernias after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):546–51.
Zapf M, Denham W, Barrera E, et al. Patient-centered outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4491–8.
Nguyen NT, Varela JE. Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic disorders: state of the art. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(3):160–9.
Owens M, Barry M, Janjua AZ, et al. A systematic review of laparoscopic port site hernias in gastrointestinal surgery. Surgeon. 2011;9(4):218–24.
Gutierrez M, Stuparich M, Behbehani S, et al. Does closure of fascia, type, and location of trocar influence occurrence of port site hernias? A literature review. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(12):5250–8.
Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):427–36.
Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith IT, Wolfe BM, et al. Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):181–8.
Buia A, Stockhausen F, Hanisch E. Laparoscopic surgery: a qualified systematic review. World J Methodol. 2015;5(4):238–54.
Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures–2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(2):175–247.
Morino M, Toppino M, Forestieri P, et al. Mortality after bariatric surgery: analysis of 13,871 morbidly obese patients from a national registry. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):1002–7.
La Chapelle CF, Bemelman WA, Bongers MY, et al. A multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for minimally invasive surgery: part 2—laparoscopic port instruments, trocar site closure, and electrosurgical techniques. Gynecol Surg. 2013;10(1):11–23.
Arifuzaman M, Samreen A. Laparoscopic port closure techniques and incidence of port-site hernias: a review and recommendations. WJOLS. 2018;11(2):90–101.
Karthik S, Augustine AJ, Shibumon MM, et al. Analysis of laparoscopic port site complications: a descriptive study. J Minim Access Surg. 2013;9(2):59–64.
Pilone V, Di Micco R, Hasani A, et al. Trocar site hernia after bariatric surgery: our experience without fascial closure. Int J Surg. 2014;12(Suppl 1):S83–6.
Karampinis I, Lion E, Grilli M, et al. Trocar site hernias in bariatric surgery-an underestimated issue: a qualitative systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29(3):1049–57.
Swank HA, Mulder IM, la Chapelle CF, et al. Systematic review of trocar-site hernia. Br J Surg. 2012;99(3):315–23.
Azurin DJ, Go LS, Arroyo LR, et al. Trocar site herniation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the significance of an incidental preexisting umbilical hernia. Am Surg. 1995;61(8):718–20.
Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E, et al. Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg. 1997;21(5):529–33.
Montz FJ, Holschneider CH, Munro MG. Incisional hernia following laparoscopy: a survey of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84(5):881–4.
Colizza S, Rossi S, Picardi B, et al. Surgical infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: ceftriaxone vs ceftazidime antibiotic prophylaxis A prospective study. Chir Ital. 2004;56(3):397–402.
Lambertz A, Stuben BO, Bock B, et al. Port-site incisional hernia - a case series of 54 patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017;14:8–11.
Masci E, Faillace G, Longoni M. Use of oxidized regenerated cellulose to achieve hemostasis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):239.
Singal R, Zaman M, Mittal A, et al. No need of fascia closure to reduce trocar site hernia rate in laparoscopic surgery: a prospective study of 200 non-obese patients. Gastroenterol Res. 2016;9(4–5):70–3.
Wells A, Germanos GJ, Salemi JL, et al. Laparoscopic surgeons'’ perspectives on risk factors for and prophylaxis of trocar site hernias: a multispecialty national survey. JSLS. 2019;23(2).
Patel SV, Paskar DD, Nelson RL, et al. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11:CD005661.
Cenni E, Ciapetti G, Stea S, et al. Biocompatibility and performance in vitro of a hemostatic gelatin sponge. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2000;11(7):685–99.
Paterno VA, Bisin A, Addis A. Comparison of the efficacy of five standard topical hemostats: a study in porcine liver and spleen models of surgical bleeding. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):215.
De Angelis F, Abdelgawad M, Rizzello M, et al. Perioperative hemorrhagic complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: four-year experience of a bariatric center of excellence. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(9):3547–51.
Zengin A. Is jejunoduodenostomy anastomosis better than jejunogastrostomy anastomosis in laparoscopic gastrectomy and jejunal interposition? Laparosc Endosc Surg Sci. 2020;27(3):169–73.
Geraci G, Sciume C, Pisello F, et al. Trocar-related abdominal wall bleeding in 200 patients after laparoscopic cholecistectomy: personal experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(44):7165–7.
Gemici K, Okuş A, Tanrıkulu Y. The control of the port site bleedings with Foley catheter in obese patients. EJGM. 2016;13(4):101–2.
Vázquez-Frias JA, Huete-Echandi F, Cueto-Garcia J, et al. Prevention and treatment of abdominal wall bleeding complications at trocar sites: review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(3):195–7.
Crocetti D, Sapienza P, Pedullà G, et al. Reducing the risk of trocar site hernias. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96(7):558.
Lim R, Beekley A, Johnson DC, et al. Early and late complications of bariatric operation. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018;3(1):e000219.
Jamil LH, Krause KR, Chengelis DL, et al. Endoscopic management of early upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(1):86–91.
Mehran A, Szomstein S, Zundel N, et al. Management of acute bleeding after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2003;13(6):842–7.
den Hoed PT, Boelhouwer RU, Veen HF, et al. Infections and bacteriological data after laparoscopic and open gallbladder surgery. J Hosp Infect. 1998;39(1):27–37.
Natalin RA, Lima FS, Pinheiro T, et al. The final stage of the laparoscopic procedure: exploring final steps. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38:04–16.
Jeon Y, Song S, Han KW, et al. Evaluation of a novel trocar-site closure device in laparoscopic surgery. JSLS. 2020;24(3).
Di Lorenzo N, Coscarella G, Lirosi F, et al. Port-site closure: a new problem, an old device. JSLS. 2002;6(2):181–3.
Cho KS, Park CH, Hong SL, et al. Comparative analysis of Cutanplast and Spongostan nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(7):1699–705.
Cho KS, Shin SK, Lee JH, et al. The efficacy of Cutanplast nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(3):564–8.
Charlesworth TM, Agthe P, Moores A, et al. The use of haemostatic gelatin sponges in veterinary surgery. J Small Anim Pract. 2012;53(1):51–6.
Giammalva RG, Brunasso L, Costanzo R, et al. The role of hemostatic devices in neurosurgery A systematic review. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;89:151–7.
Hajosch R, Suckfuell M, Oesser S, et al. A novel gelatin sponge for accelerated hemostasis. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;94(2):372–9.
Schwetz BA. New Weight-reduction system: food and drug administration approvals. JAMA. 2001;286(5):527.
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO discussion paper (version dated 19 August 2021): draft recommendations for the prevention and management of obesity over the life course, including potential targets. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/2021. Accessed 22 February, 2022.
Seidell JC, Flegal KM. Assessing obesity: classification and epidemiology. Br Med Bull. 1997;53(2):238–52.
Aminian A, Chang J, Brethauer SA, et al. ASMBS updated position statement on bariatric surgery in class I obesity (BMI 30–35 kg/m2). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(8):1071–87.
National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Conference Panel. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956–61.
Miller WC, Henricson HL, Moreland MM. Use of a weight loss index for evaluating weight management in adults. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39(1):13–7.
Corcelles R, Boules M, Froylich D, et al. Total weight loss as the outcome measure of choice after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1794–8.
Ri M, Aikou S, Seto Y. Obesity as a surgical risk factor. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018;2(1):13–21.
Inaba CS, Koh CY, Sujatha-Bhaskar S, et al. Operative time as a marker of quality in bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(7):1113–20.
Jackson TD, Wannares JJ, Lancaster RT, et al. Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(7):2288–95.
Reames BN, Bacal D, Krell RW, et al. Influence of median surgeon operative duration on adverse outcomes in bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(1):207–13.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ray Hill, an independent medical writer, who provided medical writing support on behalf of Springer Healthcare. This assistance was funded by Mascia Brunelli S.p.A., Italy.
Funding
This study was funded by Mascia Brunelli S.p.A., Milan, Italy. The funding sources had no role in the design of this study, and no role in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or the writing of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Ethics Approval
The protocol and design of the study were approved by the local institutional review board. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All operations were performed after obtaining informed consent from each patient.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Key Points
• The Cutanplast plug is a novel technique for port closure after laparoscopic surgery.
• One-step closure of port-site trocar incisions by biodegradable plug is fast and efficient.
• Operating times and the incidence of bleeding and herniation are reduced.
• The technique needs only one step to perform and results in few complications.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 Port-site trocar closure by biodegradable plug (MP4 183220 KB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Andraos, Y. Safety and Efficacy of Trocar Port-Site Closure Using a Biological Plug Closure in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Prospective Study. OBES SURG 32, 3796–3806 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06238-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06238-y