Abstract
Introduction
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded Medicaid (ME) and instituted Essential Health Benefits (EHB) that included bariatric surgery coverage on a state-by-state opt-in basis, increasing insurance coverage of bariatric surgery.
Materials and Methods
Using a difference-in-differences framework, changes in bariatric surgery rates, defined as utilization in the population of people with obesity, before and after the ACA were evaluated in four states. Bariatric surgery procedure data were taken from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s State In-patient Database 2012–2015. Adjusted multivariable regressions were run in the Medicaid and commercially insured populations.
Results
We identified 36,456 bariatric surgeries across the 286 Health Service Areas and time periods, with 31,732 covered by commercial insurers and 4724 covered by Medicaid. An unadjusted increase in utilization rates was seen in the Medicaid and Commercial populations in both ME- and EHB-covered states as well as non-expansion and EHB opt-out states over time. In the Medicaid population, after adjusting for confounders, there was a significant increase of 24.77 cases per 100,000 people with obesity (95% confidence interval: 12.41, 37.13) in the expansion states relative to the control and pre-period. The commercial population experienced a nonsignificant change in the rates of bariatric surgery, decreasing by 2.89 cases per 100,000 people with obesity (95% confidence interval: − 21.59, 15.81).
Conclusions
There was a significant increase in bariatric surgery rates among Medicaid beneficiaries associated with Medicaid expansion, but there was no change among the commercially insured.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, et al. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(8):806–14.
Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults: United States, 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief, no 360. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2020.
Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, et al. Years of life lost due to obesity. JAMA. 2003;289:187–93.
Obesity and Cancer Risk. National Cancer Institute. Web. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
Wang YC, Pamplin J, Long MW, et al. Severe obesity in adults cost state Medicaid programs nearly $8 billion in 2013. Health Aff. 2015;34(11):1923–31.
Cawley J, Rizzo JA, Haas K. Occupation-specific absenteeism costs associated with obesity and morbid obesity. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49(12):1317–24.
Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f5934.
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systemic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–8.
Fouse T, Schauer P. The socioeconomic impact of morbid obesity and factors affecting access to obesity surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2016;96(4):669–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2016.03.002.
Cremieux PY, Buchwald H, Shikora SA, et al. A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(9):589–96.
Gulliford MC, Charlton J, Prevost T, Booth H, Fildes A, Ashworth M, Littlejohns P, Reddy M, Khan O, Rudisill C. Costs and outcomes of increasing access to bariatric surgery: cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis using electronic health records. Value Health. 2017;20(1):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.734.
Martin M, Beekley A, Kjorstad R, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: a national population-based analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:8–15.
Alexander JW, Goodman HR, Hawver LRM, et al. The impact of Medicaid status on outcome after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1241–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9615-7.
Status of state action on the Medicaid expansion decision. Kaiser Family Foundation. 14 March 2016. Web. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
Eligibility. medicaid.gov. Web. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
Yang YT, Pomeranz JL. States variations in the provision of bariatric surgery under affordable care act exchanges. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:715–20.
HCUP State Inpatient Databases (SID). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2005–2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/sidoverview.jsp. Accessed 20 Mar 2021.
U.S. Census Bureau. State Population Estimates. 2014.
RWJF. The State of Obesity 2014. Princeton, NJ. Available at: https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2014/09/the-state-of-obesity.html. Accessed 8 Aug 2020.
The Dartmouth Atlas Project. Variation in the Care of Surgical Conditions 2014. Lebanon, NJ. Available at: https://www.dartmouthatlas.org/downloads/atlases/Surgical_Atlas_2014.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2020.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station: StataCorp LLC; 2017.
Gould KM, Zeymo A, Chan KS, DeLeire T, Shara N, Shope TR, Al-Refaie WB. Bariatric surgery among vulnerable populations: the effect of the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion. Surgery. 2019;166(5):820–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.005.
Cazzo E, Ramos AC, Pareja JC, Chaim EA. Nationwide macroeconomic variables and the growth rate of bariatric surgeries in Brazil. Obes Surg. 2018;28(10):3193–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3318-5.
Cazzo E, Ramos AC, Chaim EA. Bariatric surgery offer in Brazil: a macroeconomic analysis of the health system’s inequalities. Obes Surg. 2019;29(6):1874–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03761-3.
Chhabra KR, Fan Z, Chao GF, Dimick JB, Telem DA. Impact of statewide essential health benefits on utilization of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2019;30(1):374–7.
Ellimoottil C, Miller S, Ayanian JZ, Miller DC. Effect of insurance expansion on utilization of inpatient surgery. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(8):829–36. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.857.
Crocker AB, Zeymo A, Chan K, et al. The Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion and utilization of discretionary vs. non-discretionary inpatient surgery. Surgery. 2018;164(6):1156–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.007.
Afonso BB, Rosenthal R, Li KM, Zapatier J, Szomstein S. Perceived barriers to bariatric surgery among morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.07.006.
Wharton S, Serodio KJ, Kuk JL, Sivapalan N, Craik A, Aarts MA. Interest, views and perceived barriers to bariatric surgery in patients with morbid obesity. Clin Obes. 2016;6(2):154–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12131.
Imbus JR, Voils CI, Funk LM. Bariatric surgery barriers: a review using Andersen’s Model of Health Services Use. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):404–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.11.012.
Doumouras AG, Lee Y, Babe G, Gmora S, Tarride JE, Hong D, Anvari M. The hidden cost of an extensive preoperative work-up: predictors of attrition after referral for bariatric surgery in a universal healthcare system. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(2):988–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06894-9.
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Ramos A, Shikora S, Kow L. Bariatric Surgery Survey 2018: similarities and disparities among the 5 IFSO chapters. Obes Surg. 2021;31(5):1937–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05207-7.
Dixon JB. Regional differences in the coverage and uptake of bariatric-metabolic surgery: a focus on type 2 diabetes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(6):1171–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.11.027.
Global Health Observatory [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization. c2017- [cited 2021 July 19] Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho. Accessed 15 Jul 2021.
Funding
This project was funded by a Leonard Davis Institute Pilot Project Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent does not apply.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Key Points
• Bariatric surgery rates have been increasing over time in all populations, but the procedure remains underutilized.
• ME resulted in more bariatric operations in expansion states relative to non-expansion states.
• Coverage of bariatric surgery by EHB had no significant effect on a state’s surgery rates.
• Poor insurance coverage of this surgery is only one of many factors resulting in its underutilization.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brooks, E.S., Bailey, E.A., Mavroudis, C.L. et al. The Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Utilization of Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 31, 4919–4925 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05669-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05669-3