Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adverse Neonatal and Obstetric Outcomes in a 20-year Brazilian Retrospective Cohort of Pregnancies after Bariatric Surgery

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluation of obstetric and neonatal outcomes in a Brazilian retrospective cohort of pregnancies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), regarding the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations about gestational weight gain (GWG) and RYGB-conception interval. Additionally, search for intrapopulation risk factors for small gestational age (SGA) offspring and mental health assessments.

Material and methods

Retrospective analysis of 132 singleton pregnancies after RYGB. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were analyzed with stratification in above, below, or meeting the target regarding GWG guidance, and 0–12, 12–47, and ≥48 months for RYGB-conception interval. SGA risk factors were identified through Poisson regression analysis.

Results

GWG below the recommendations was associated with prematurity (p 0.003). Late conceptions (≥48 months) were associated with iron deficiency (p 0.025). Parenteral iron prescription was a protective factor for SGA, with a relative risk of 0.41 (95% CI, 0.20–0.85; p 0.017), and GWG below target was a SGA risk factor, with a relative risk of 4.68 (95% CI, 1.48–14.8; p 0.008). In all, 15.2% of patients had psychopharmacological treatment during pregnancy, and 7.6% received a diagnosis of postpartum depression. Any alcohol and tobacco consumption were reported in 3.8 and 6.8% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion

The recommendations regarding GWG apply to the RYGB population, and surgery-conception intervals should be individualized. The parenteral iron prescription was a protective factor for SGA, and GWG below the recommendations of the IOM was a risk factor for SGA. Psychological and psychiatric care should be offered to every possible pregnancy after RYGB.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators, Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional em Saúde – 2019. Atenção Primária à Saúde e Informações Antropométricas. [Brazilian Health throughout the National Territory]. Available from: https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/media/com_mediaibge/arquivos/5811926443ab4e7d2005212af8a918e9.pdf. .

  3. GBD 2016 Brazil Collaborators. Burden of disease in Brazil, 1990–2016: a systematic subnational analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392(10149):760–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gambineri A, Laudisio D, Marocco C, et al. Female infertility: which role for obesity? Int J Obes Suppl. 2019;9(1):65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ovesen P, Rasmussen S, Kesmodel U. Effect of prepregnancy maternal overweight and obesity on pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 Pt 1):305–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brewer C, Balen A. The adverse effects of obesity on conception and implantation. Reproduction. 2010;140(3):347–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arterburn DE, Olsen MK, Smith VA, et al. Association between bariatric surgery and long-term survival. JAMA. 2015;313(1):62–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maggard MA, Yermilov I, Li Z, et al. Pregnancy and fertility following bariatric surgery: a systematic review. JAMA. 2008;300(19):2286–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Federal Council of Medicine, Brazil. Resolution 2131/2015. Available from: http://www.portalmedico.org.br/resolucoes/cfm/2015/2131_2015.pdf. .

  10. Ciangura C, Coupaye M, Deruelle P, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for childbearing female candidates for bariatric surgery, pregnancy, and post-partum management after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2019;29(11):3722–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shawe J, Ceulemans D, Akhter Z, et al. Pregnancy after bariatric surgery: consensus recommendations for periconception, antenatal and postnatal care. Obes Rev. 2019;20(11):1507–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mody SK, Hacker MR, Dodge LE, et al. Contraceptive counseling for women who undergo bariatric surgery. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2011;20(12):1785–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ginstman C, Frisk J, Ottosson J, et al. Contraceptive use before and after gastric bypass: a questionnaire study. Obes Surg. 2015;25(11):2066–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwong W, Tomlinson G, Feig DS. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after bariatric surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis: do the benefits outweigh the risks? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(6):573–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coupaye M, Legardeur H, Sami O, et al. Impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on fetal growth and relationship with maternal nutritional status. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(10):1488–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. In: Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Painter R, Osmond C, Gluckman P, et al. Transgenerational effects of prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine on neonatal adiposity and health in later life. BJOG. 2008;115(10):1243–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Padilha PC, Saunders C, Machado RCM, et al. Associação entre o estado nutricional pré-gestacional e a predição do risco de intercorrências gestacionais. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2007;29(10):511–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dawes AJ, Maggard-Gibbons M, Maher AR, et al. Mental health conditions among patients seeking and undergoing bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;315(2):150–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morgan DJR, Ho KM, Platell C. Incidence and determinants of mental health service use after bariatric surgery. JAMA Psychiat. 2020;77(1):60–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jans G, Matthys C, Bogaerts A, et al. Depression and anxiety: lack of associations with an inadequate diet in a sample of pregnant women with a history of bariatric surgery-a multicenter prospective controlled cohort study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(6):1629–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient-2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21 Suppl 1(0 1):S1–S27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Luca M, Angrisani L, Himpens J, et al. Indications for Surgery for Obesity and Weight-Related Diseases: Position Statements from the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO). Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1659–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pedreira CE, Pinto FA, Pereira SP, et al. Birth weight patterns by gestational age in Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2011;83(2):619–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldstein RF, Abell SK, Ranasinha S, et al. Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2017;317(21):2207–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Macdonald-Wallis C, Tilling K, Fraser A, et al. Gestational weight gain as a risk factor for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(4):327.e1–327.e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hedderson MM, Gunderson EP, Ferrara A. Gestational weight gain and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3):597–604. Erratum in: Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(5):1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Johansson K, Stephansson O, Neovius M. Outcomes of pregnancy after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(23):2267.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Grandfils S, Demondion D, Kyheng M, et al. Impact of gestational weight gain on perinatal outcomes after a bariatric surgery. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(6):401–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stentebjerg LL, Andersen LLT, Renault K, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes according to surgery to conception interval and gestational weight gain in women with previous gastric bypass. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(10):1182–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hartmann JM, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Cesar JA. Depressão entre puérperas: prevalência e fatores associados. Cad Saude Publica. 2017;33(9):e00094016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Domingues RMSM, Figueiredo VC, Leal MDC. Prevalence of pre-gestational and gestational smoking and factors associated with smoking cessation during pregnancy, Brazil, 2011-2012. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0217397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kataoka MC, Carvalheira APP, Ferrari AP, et al. Smoking during pregnancy and harm reduction in birth weight: a cross-sectional study. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2018;18:67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Guimarães VA, Fernandes KS, Lucchese R, et al. Prevalência e fatores associados ao uso de álcool durante a gestação em uma maternidade de Goiás, Brasil Central. Cien Saude Colet. 2018;23(10):3413–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pereira CM, Pacagnella RC, Parpinelli MA, et al. Drug use during pregnancy and its consequences: a nested case control study on severe maternal morbidity. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40(9):518–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Legro RS, Dodson WC, Gnatuk CL, et al. Effects of gastric bypass surgery on female reproductive function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(12):4540–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Steffen KJ, King WC, White GE, et al. Changes in sexual functioning in women and men in the 5 years after bariatric surgery. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(6):487–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ginstman C, Kopp Kallner H, Fagerberg-Silwer J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral levonorgestrel in women after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery and in BMI-matched controls. Obes Surg. 2020;30(6):2217–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Knobel R, Lopes TJP, Menezes MO, et al. Cesarean-section rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: cross-sectional analysis using the Robson Classification. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020;42(9):522–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Benjamin RH, Littlejohn S, Mitchell LE. Bariatric surgery and birth defects: a systematic literature review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018;32(6):533–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For showing relentless aid in the organization and search of medical records, encouraging and making this publication feasible, we sincerely thank Ms. Rejane von Muhlen from the Center for Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome, São Lucas Hospital, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. We are also thankful to Ms. Ceres Andreia Vieira de Oliveira for the statistical advice.

Funding

This work was funded in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001. The authors declared no other financial support for the research and publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo B. Walter.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the institutional and national research committee’s ethical standards and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walter, L.B., Dolzan, D., Areias, T. et al. Adverse Neonatal and Obstetric Outcomes in a 20-year Brazilian Retrospective Cohort of Pregnancies after Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 31, 2859–2868 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05369-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05369-y

Keywords

Navigation